• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Marvel Magic limitation

Messages
2,174
Reaction score
861
Intro/Summary

A year ago, a page for Marvel Comics' was made. This gave magic users, including Hulk, abilities like Plot Manipulation, Information Type 2, Concept and Law Manipulation. Many VS Threads involving magic users in Marvel are considered stomps because people are saying that literally every magic attack has 1-A hax and without a resistance to it, the other character gets one shot.

The purpose of this thread isn’t to downgrade the potency of magic to below 1-A levels, it also isn’t gonna be removing much hax. Instead, its proposing that the Durability Negation hax of magic (Plot Manipulation, Soul Manipulation, Information Type 2, Concept and Law Manipulation) can still be affected by conventional durability and that its possible to endure, tank or withstand magic without even having hax or magic resistance, depending on the spell of course. This is pretty similar to this Undertale SOUL manipulation CRT, where its proposed that despite Undertale monsters having soul manipulation, you can still defend against their attacks through conventional means.

I am not saying that magic spells do not bypass conventional durability at all. In fact, some of the scans I will be using showcase characters getting their durability or resistance bypassed by magic to a certain degree, such as Iron Man being affected by magical flames due to the fact that it is magic based rather than science based. What I’m proposing will be summarized here:

Marvel characters who have no resistance to magic, and by extension no resistance to its plot/concept/info/law/soul manipulation, are still able to endure and sometimes tank magic without getting instantly stomped by “1-A smurf hax”. This is because Magic is still affected by conventional durability to some degree. Additionally, some hax based spells like Blackheart's magic mind manipulation can be resisted by those without magic resistance, an example is Daredevil snapping out of Blackheart's mind control through willpower and Spidey's help alone, and not some kind of resistance to narrative/law manipulation or whatever.


Possible Counterarguments

As mentioned above, the main reasoning why I’m proposing this is because its very common for people in Marvel to withstand magic attacks despite the fact that they have no magic resistance (examples listed below). I know someone is gonna say “That just means all of these characters have resistance to 1-A tier magic and conceptual/plot/law/info hax!”. Firstly, I have included examples of characters who are explicitly stated to have no magic defence, like Gladiator’s race. In general, characters, powers and technologies that are science based like Iron Man armors or Vision don't have magic resistance, although there may be some exceptions. Additionally, what I’m saying is literally supported by the Magic page: “Also, it is hinted at by Doctor Doom that those without magic are unable to resist any magic attacks something which he also states here.” It also wouldn’t make sense for all of these characters to simply have magic resistance- magic attacks are so common in Marvel that you’d basically be saying the entire verse would have resistance to conceptual and 1-A bullshit, which is contradicted by the very existence of magic vulnerable super powered humans, and the stuff I mentioned above about science based powers/technologies in general having no magic resistance. Hell, even non powered humans have withstood magic attacks without instantly getting taken out of the fight.

Examples

One of the more blatant examples is Gladiator, who is vulnerable to magic. Despite that, in the same scan, he is able to tank a magic blast without getting instantly one shot by conceptual or narrative smurf hax. This isn’t the only example of Gladiator taking magic attacks of course, he is able to take attacks from Cyclops with a portion of the Phoenix Force's power. The Phoenix Force is accepted as magic here. Gladiator has also fought Thor before, and he is fine after being hit by Mjolnir, and is able to continue fighting (Thor's basic attacks are accepted as magic here, check the innate powers section). In a modern comic, Gladiator can take hits from Mjolnir, and although Thor was weakened, he still had a magical aura around his hammer.

Iron Man is also a character who has withstood magic on multiple occasions (examples shown in the next paragraph). Iron Man’s suits, with the exception of his Mysterium Armor, explicitly don’t have magic resistance. Additionally, multiple of his modern armors classify magic as an unknown energy.

The most blatant example I could think of for Iron Man enduring magic is the Silver Centurion withstanding Master Pandemonium's flames. In that scan, Iron Man states that the flames are burning him due to being supernatural, implying that it is something he doesn’t have a defense to. And yet Iron Man is able to power through it, stating that it would take minutes before the flames reach his flesh. In a later comic, Master Pandemonium implies that he melted Iron Man's armor due to its mystical nature (being demonic), and he proceeds to hurt Human Torch, but Johnny is fine afterwards. Johnny Storm is also not resistant to magic, in fact its accepted that magic fire can bypass his conventional fire/heat resistance. For context, Master Pandemonium has magic comparable or stronger than Agatha Harkness, who is considered to be a high-tier sorceress

In Iron Man #600, he takes the Hood's electricity and isn’t significantly hurt. At the time, the Hood’s source of power was the demon possessing him, so its a form of magic. When Madame Masque gained magic powers that the Model 51 is unable to recognize, the armor is able to withstand prolonged exposure to her magical blasts, and is even able to fight back despite Friday ejecting Tony. Even though magic is distanced from the laws of reality, it is still affected by conventional or science based abilities- Iron Man's Silver Centurion armor is able to withstand Mephisto's fire by utilizing cooling systems. He can't really go through the wall of fire, but he isn't even significantly damaged by it.

Luke Cage, a character with no magic resistance, is able to tank the Hood's bullets which have been infused with the Norn Stones' magic. He also withstood the Hood's magical flames. Hawkeye, who doesn’t have superpowers, takes a magic attack from the Hood, and can still get back up and continue firing arrows.

Conclusion

The Magic (Marvel Comics) page should include a new weakness: that despite all of its hax and higher dimensional potency, it can still be affected by conventional durability/resistances to a certain extent. Something like

Despite Magic's 1-A potency and durability negating traits, it is still affected by conventional durability. Depending on the potency, some spells may be resisted through conventional means by characters without a resistance to magic or its effects
 
Last edited:
I think that everybody in marvel should have 1-A resistance to conceptual/plot manipulation since:
1) every character concept/archetype is come from ideaverse which is archetype universe from which is made multiverse
2) Every being from starting from fourth cosmos is conceptual being
3) Characters stories able to create different narratives and universes
Also I'm not sure that you can use example with superman since it's from crossover event
 
I agree that the Superman stuff isn't viable given that we'd have to equalize DC and Marvel magic, among other things.
 
Btw, the mind stuff like with Daredevils isn't really an antifeat since all astral forms (which among other things are the mind) are 1-A in nature.
I know, I'm saying that you can resist mindhax without resisting magic specific narrative/info hax

I think that everybody in marvel should have 1-A resistance to conceptual/plot manipulation since:
1) every character concept/archetype is come from ideaverse which is archetype universe from which is made multiverse
2) Every being from starting from fourth cosmos is conceptual being
3) Characters stories able to create different narratives and universes
The examples I gave showcase characters using conventional durability rather than plothax/concept hax resistance to endure magic however. Like Tony Stark putting on his armor would protect him from hellfire not because his armor gives him conceptual resistance, but because its more durable than his flesh. So even if every Marvel character has a 1-A concept and story, that wouldn't be relevant here because nobody in Marvel withstands magic because their concept/story is 1-A, but because of their durability (or for magical characters, because of their resistance to magic)



I agree that the Superman stuff isn't viable given that we'd have to equalize DC and Marvel magic, among other things.
Even if that were the case, I have more examples being used
 
Last edited:
I agree but yeah I think the Superman one is unnecessarily making the thread slightly more convoluted since that and the arguments related to it's canonicity are being focused on rather than the other examples
 
Like Tony Stark putting on his armor would protect him from hellfire not because his armor gives him conceptual resistance, but because its more durable than his flesh. So even if every Marvel character has a 1-A concept and story, that wouldn't be relevant here because nobody in Marvel withstands magic because their concept/story is 1-A, but because of their durability (or for magical characters, because of their resistance to magic)
Magic damages narratively/conceptualy/physically/soul characters have enough durability to tank physical damage and also because of marvel metaphysics they able to tank others types of damage. But if it was character from other verse he may tank spell physically but he still be damaged narratively/conceptually.
 
because people are saying that literally every magic attack has 1-A hax and without a resistance to it, the other character gets one shot.
I mean, no offense man, but people nowadays act like any character with one upscale or more than five abilities oneshot everyone in sight. I won't go by that anyways.

But yeah basically, not every spell is 1-A. Simple as. There are 1-A spells and there are 10-C spells in the verse. I don't see what the thread objective is. There are FAR WORSE things about the Marvel Magic page that are worth downgrading, I don't think this is one of them.
 
I know, I'm saying that you can resist mindhax without resisting magic specific narrative/info hax
The Astral Plane is a magical realm.

I think that everybody in marvel should have 1-A resistance to conceptual/plot manipulation since:
1) every character concept/archetype is come from ideaverse which is archetype universe from which is made multiverse
2) Every being from starting from fourth cosmos is conceptual being
3) Characters stories able to create different narratives and universes
Also I'm not sure that you can use example with superman since it's from crossover event
Good Arg.

Magic damages narratively/conceptualy/physically/soul characters have enough durability to tank physical damage and also because of marvel metaphysics they able to tank others types of damage. But if it was character from other verse he may tank spell physically but he still be damaged narratively/conceptually.
So you're saying the hax range/potency should garner the 1-A rating but the actual attack potency of the magic itself would be something else?
I thought that was how it was regardless before?
 
We should delete the page or reduce it to just the nature of magic, since it's pretty clear to even casual readers that just because Strange did a spell doesn't mean literally everyone can
There are many magics and spells that are shown or stated to be done by any sorcerer, such as the Rings of Ragaddor or the Crimson Bands of Cytorrak.
 
There are many magics and spells that are shown or stated to be done by any sorcerer, such as the Rings of Ragaddor or the Crimson Bands of Cytorrak.
Yah and the page doesn't include just those even if I'm not arguing against those (Which I think realistically you can, or at least it's a "It exists but the character probably never uses it at a regular capacity at all")
 
There are many magics and spells that are shown or stated to be done by any sorcerer, such as the Rings of Ragaddor or the Crimson Bands of Cytorrak.
Most of the problems that people have with marvel magic is the basic marvel level which is the one given to anything that has magic, but it's clearly stated that anything in basic level is part of what magic is and not a list of spells.
 
since it's pretty clear to even casual readers that just because Strange did a spell doesn't mean literally everyone can
If a spell is stated to be "basic" or of a lesser level, it shouldn't be contentious to assume anybody capable of magic could do such things or perform such spells.
Especially if the magic user in question comes from the academy.

I agree with this when we get into the tier spells higher than basic.
 
So you're saying the hax range/potency should garner the 1-A rating but the actual attack potency of the magic itself would be something else?
I thought that was how it was regardless before?
Yes. Simply I wanted to say that technically even random fireball is 1-A in nature because is changing reality with a inner microcosm or connection to eternity but it just do some physical damage because everyone have inner microcosm and connection to eternity.
Also since thread about magic should magic be updated due to cosmology split? As I remember Adam kadmon, Kleito and Scrier are magic users.
 
Yah and the page doesn't include just those even if I'm not arguing against those (Which I think realistically you can, or at least it's a "It exists but the character probably never uses it at a regular capacity at all")
I agree with the Magic Page getting downgraded/trimmed, following the OP for now.
I know, but that's not the point of this CRT. This is for Basic Magic, not the list of spells magic users can use
 
And that's not going to change in any capacity, the Smurf hax like conceptual manipulation, law manipulation, plot manipulation ect are all how magic works so nothing of that is gonna disappear.
The point of the thread isn't to remove those hax, if you read the summary you would understand
 
Everything, your CRT literally starts by saying that magic makes marvel characters stomp most fights.
This doesn't even address the arguments I've made. I could also say you're ignoring the points being brought up in this CRT

I read, you are attempting to ignore the nature of magic
I addressed this in the CRT, where I explain that despite its nature, people with conventional durability without a resistance to it can survive it.

What you're saying is also backtracking. "Magic has plot/concept/info hax" -> magic can be affected by conventional durability -> "Ok but magic has plot and concept hax and you're ignoring that". You're not actually refuting what I said but just repeating the points
 
Everything, your CRT literally starts by saying that magic makes marvel characters stomp most fights.
Funny how they put characters with no resistance to the said Plot and Concept hax against Marvel characters who have them.

Why wouldn't it be a stomp, if the character you are up against has no defense against those hax? It's like putting a 3-C against a High 3-A and expect the 3-C to win.


@Hypertornado099
Your upcoming thread about Gamma Magic, don't bother since the entirety of Immortal Hulk and this current run is dedicated to Gamma Magic. I don't know how you are going to debunk that.

Familiarize yourself with Marvel Magic and Astral System before making a CRT.
 
Funny how they put characters with no resistance to the said Plot and Concept hax against Marvel characters who have them.

Why wouldn't it be a stomp, if the character you are up against has no defense against those hax? It's like putting a 3-C against a High 3-A and expect the 3-C to win.
... this is also literally not addressing any point made in the CRT

@Hypertornado099
Your upcoming thread about Gamma Magic, don't bother since the entirety of Immortal Hulk and this current run is dedicated to Gamma Magic. I don't know how you are going to debunk that.

Familiarize yourself with Marvel Magic and Astral System before making a CRT.
Comments like these don't contribute to the discussion at all
 
This doesn't even address the arguments I've made. I could also say you're ignoring the points being brought up in this CRT


I addressed this in the CRT, where I explain that despite its nature, people with conventional durability without a resistance to it can survive it.

What you're saying is also backtracking. "Magic has plot/concept/info hax" -> magic can be affected by conventional durability -> "Ok but magic has plot and concept hax and you're ignoring that". You're not actually refuting what I said but just repeating the points
You went to pick some small examples in comics that have little connection to the actual world of magic, while you do that you have actual comics that are entirely made for magic that explain how it works, those have priority, not just that but if you read the marvel magic page you get huge walls of text with many scans and detailed explainations for why that works how it works.
 
Funny how they put characters with no resistance to the said Plot and Concept hax against Marvel characters who have them.

Why wouldn't it be a stomp, if the character you are up against has no defense against those hax? It's like putting a 3-C against a High 3-A and expect the 3-C to win.
It seems more like going to dowgrade the H3-A because he would stomp the 3-C in a fight
 
You went to pick some small examples in comics that have little connection to the actual world of magic, while you do that you have actual comics that are entirely made for magic that explain how it works,
What about those comics contradicts the points I made in the thread? And what do you mean by "comics that have little connection to the actual world of magic" Are you saying that comics that aren't entirely focused on magic don't treat magic the same way these comics do?

ot just that but if you read the marvel magic page you get huge walls of text with many scans and detailed explainations for why that works how it works.
Yes, and none of that necessarily contradicts what I brought up in the thread. This is also circular, as I've mentioned here
"Magic has plot/concept/info hax" -> magic can be affected by conventional durability -> "Ok but magic has plot and concept hax and you're ignoring that"

So everyone in Marvel comics has resistance to plot and conceptual hax?
He's probably gonna say yes because of these reasonings, but that's not a proper reasoning because those 3 things (outerversal archetypes, concepts and stories) are not the reason why characters endure magic. If Doctor Strange resists a spell that should turn you into a frog, its because he has magic resistance, not because everyone in Marvel including him has a 1-A concept and story. If a non-powered human or inanimate object with no magic resistance endures a blast of magic, its not because "their concept/archetype comes from ideaverse", its because they are durable
 
What about those comics contradicts the points I made in the thread? And what do you mean by "comics that have little connection to the actual world of magic" Are you saying that comics that aren't entirely focused on magic don't treat magic the same way these comics do?
Do you wanna talk about outliers/PIS in comics? Are you also looking to have Thor dowgraded to street tier because he fought Daredevil? Authors don't always make it consistentsimple as that
Yes, and none of that necessarily contradicts what I brought up in the thread. This is also circular, as I've mentioned here
Thor destroys a galaxy->Also Thor fights daredevil->Daredevil=galaxy, same logic
 
Back
Top