DDLC: fixing and updating everything

[DarkDragonMedeus]

And there are literally 3 votes in favor, what?

IIRC, it's usually preferred if there is a 3 vote gap.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

If votes in favor remain unanimous, I'll concede just to get this wrapped up. My contention is steeped in a lack of certainty in the argument, if it is unanimous aside, I'd just rather not hold this up.

 

[StrymULTRA]

I sincerely, genuinely, from the bottom of my heart, ******* hate discussions like this

I still don't know if I can get behind the idea of void manip, here. The idea is, that the game still contains the world after all has been deleted (or the universes have been destroyed, per the wording of those in-game emails). With the evidence provided, though, I'm not sure I agree that the universes are literally destroyed (as in, rendered nonexistent); I think much of what is in them is destroyed, obviously- I think time no longer exists and I think the vast majority of existence was erased. But I don't know if it's enough for me to agree that it meets the requirements of a full void. This has obvious implications to the rest of the assertions in that bit of the CRT.


...I had been typing a reply, only to get dragged to another discussion, only to then get dragged to a third, even worse discussion, etc. I only dedicate so much time to the site a day, man, and a lot of that is consumed by high priority stuff.

I don't really care if the CRT leaves me outvoted, but if I came to the thread and viewed it, it can generally be assumed I at least started to reply. Scout's honor, promise.

That's alright, it's just that a lot of my CRTs had staff leaving a disagreement then just never coming back when I ask further.

I just assumed that you did the same and misinterpreted your intentions. So my apologies for that.

If votes in favor remain unanimous, I'll concede just to get this wrapped up. My contention is steeped in a pack of certainty in the argument, if it is unanimous aside, I'd just rather not hold this up.

IIRC, it's usually preferred if there is a 3 vote gap.

As for what Lephyr said before, if DDM is ok then I'll try to apply the revisions today.

Otherwise, if still not enough, more staff can be called here.

 

[StrymULTRA]

that I don't think we have ever seen Monika actually erase anything without using the file stuff, and that I don't think there are more feats for this, I'm iffy about it. Of course, Styrm is more than welcome to clear this up, especially if there are more feats, but this is my stance rn.

Back on this, what you're saying is basically denying lore like those Kratos downplayers.

Monika uses the deletion of files in the game because that's the most convenient method for her goal, that being creating her happy ending with the player, and she doesn't even use file deletion until when it's necessary (she makes Yuri and Sayori commit suicide 1st and jumps to just deleting Natsuki after realizing to have accidentally exposed her own powers to us), while the stuff before happens prior to when the Player gets in the game and DDLC was still "in development" with Monika still testing said powers.

You're saying that the only way that she can delete a universe is by deleting the files, but I proved above how that's impossible (aka the reset.sh thing).

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

If votes in favor remain unanimous, I'll concede just to get this wrapped up. My contention is steeped in a pack of certainty in the argument, if it is unanimous aside, I'd just rather not hold this up.

I see

In this case, might as well go ahead.

 

[StrymULTRA]

I see

In this case, might as well go ahead.

I did so, and created the blog too.

Removed Monika's Note 2 as I think it's redundant at this point and none ever tried to argue her being 2-C here.

This thread can be closed and the fight with WN Rimuru has to be removed from the latter's profile as the matchup is outdated now.