No, what I mean is: is Udlmaster joining High 1-A+? Qawsedf234 already clearly stated that they are not joining High 1-A+, so I’m not referring to them.Well, Qawsedf234 seems to disagree with it, and I trust his sense of judgement regarding high tiers.
Yeah, I think it's a safe estimation.Do you currently agree with Qawsedf234 and VeryGoofyToddler2 here?
Yeah, Qa's suggestion is an acceptable one@DarkDragonMedeus @Firestorm808 @Udlmaster @VeryGoofyToddler2
Do you also find Qawsedf234's conclusions acceptable to apply here?
Sure@DarkDragonMedeus @Firestorm808 @Udlmaster @VeryGoofyToddler2
Do you also find Qawsedf234's conclusions acceptable to apply here?
Yes. Qaws conclusions are good to use.@DarkDragonMedeus @Firestorm808 @Udlmaster @VeryGoofyToddler2
Do you also find Qawsedf234's conclusions acceptable to apply here?
Ultima has a backlog of stuff and splits their time. If you want to wait for them, you can, otherwise, to my understanding the proposal I give here:
Has been accepted by two other Admins, which would be enough for a revision to go through.
Would you be open to a brief discussion regarding the "+" addition? I added some extra details to the cosmology page to help avoid any confusion. That said, if you don't think further input from me on this revision is necessary, I completely respect that. To be honest, I'm making a deliberate effort to avoid any kind of exaggeration when it comes to the layers. Perhaps the matter of High 1-A+ is something that can only be properly clarified through a thoughtful discussion.
I'm pretty sure that this was already discussed so I doubt you could gaslight the mods at this point. You’ll just have to wait for Ultima.
The word deceive sounds kind of funny. I’ll take your suggestion into consideration.
There's nothing funny about it. Its called knowing how to read and convey the room about what was said. Qaws stated his position very clearly, you've seem to miss the pages of talk you had with him about his position on High 1-A+.
I guess I'll just wait for Ultima.
Tbh my opinion is Ultima opinion will be same as Qaws, so you can get this one as High 1-A this is already accepted...Which one you guys tried to do before
In what sense?
Aren't hunk and you opened High 1-A order for DT?
Yes, this is what you mean:
So should we apply this now then?
If the OP wants to wait we can wait, he's just going to be waiting for awhile.So should we apply this now then?
I third this.
Well, I suppose that we can wait for a while longer.
I think @SweetDao suggestion is better.Well, I suppose that we can wait for a while longer.
I agree. In that case, it would be best to consider this content revision as High 1-A for now. I can open another CRT regarding the High 1-A+ topic soon, but for now, it seems better for High 1-A to be accepted. (At least, instead of explaining everything from the beginning again, we could just discuss the High 1-A+ topic.) In conclusion:
Is High 1-B+ indicative of a quantative hierarchy? I remember the section about the universes but I think that max cap out at High 1-B since I don't think there's an uncountable(or higher) statement.
The qualitative and quantitative status between hierarchies is a topic of debate. If you consider the mirage analogy suitable for 1-A, it would be qualitative, but if you treat this analogy as a weak context, it would be quantitative without additional context, including inaccessible terms and the transcendental states mentioned by Jack. The High 1-B+ situation was proposed by Qawsedf234. This is due to the fact that there are many macrocosmic hierarchies of High 1-B.
Before I forget, the amount of macrocosms is described as "an infinite number of infinities."
What I said during the very beginning was 2-A for the baseline level of existence so if it climbs up in a quantitative manner then structurally it's only High 1-B, there's a need to be a High 1-B place within that hierarchy for what you said to be true but I don't see that nor do I recollect any memories of it during our conversation.
Is there a scan?
The entire universe is compared to a single blade of grass. It is then implied that burning this blade is equivalent to burning an infinite number of infinities.
We've discussed this already as I recall saying it was 2-A. Though, I guess rereading it may be Low 1-C since it is an uncountable infinity above a Low 2-C structure. Unless the Universe in question is more than a 4-dimensional space.
