MountainWine
He/Him- 198
- 126
Your only argument I’ve heard so far is “it didn’t say this and that, all assumptions, therefore it isn’t this and that”. You aren’t actually tackling the reasonings for why it’s considered 5D.lack of arguments?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your only argument I’ve heard so far is “it didn’t say this and that, all assumptions, therefore it isn’t this and that”. You aren’t actually tackling the reasonings for why it’s considered 5D.lack of arguments?
i am not new to be honest, i have been here from like...the pandemic.Of course it’s assumptions and theory crafting if you say so.
Maybe it’s new to you but Battle boarders recognize similar statements and terms. Those terms anre often used regarding dimensional tiering. A better example wouldn’t require the words infinite, layered, or reality.
i gave my reasons alreadyThat's what everyone says when they have no arguments to refute, just to say I don't care about 5D either and I have no interest in it, but it gets boring that you come here to complain about these things it all the time.
You can try to upgrade to low 1-C and stop touching on the same subject here, here's a tip, man.not really, is just that someone does not want it to be that level (i know who)
that goes on Maitreya for thatYou can try to upgrade to low 1-C and stop touching on the same subject here, here's a tip, man.
ok.Your only argument I’ve heard so far is “it didn’t say this and that, all assumptions, therefore it isn’t this and that”. You aren’t actually tackling the reasonings for why it’s considered 5D.
Seems like you didn’t read the cosmology blog or any of the other supporting blogs. Or you did and didn’t understand them. If you did, you wouldn’t be making these claims.ok.
1. the multiverse having one bigger timeline is non sense, you can't have a multiverse (composed of 12 universe, or 13, or whatever the number), and then have a bigger timeline, and no explanation for this bigger timeline that we are assuming it exists.
you either have a multiverse, which each universe having a individual timeline, or you have a multiverse, with all of its space and time being affected by the timeline, but you can't have a multiverse and then have a bigger timeline, without having any statements for the later.
2. the neutral space is just, a neutral space, is not a bigger dimensional structure, it is just a way to connect the universes, that does not make it a higher dimensional structure, is like having a big solar system with 12 planets, and then the solar system is covered by a asteroid belt.
3. the time chamber is just a place with a different time flow, it is not explained to be another time axis, the explanation for it is that it is a place where time flows different from earth (or the normal universe)not like a different time axis or something like that.
it is the wording that is the problem, which is that it is not that specific, it is a different dimension of time, which could just mean that it is a space-time with a different flow of time in the context of how it works, not a higher dimension axis (this is never stated or implied by the way)which is my problem, because we are assuming that things are higher dimensions, without statements for their higher dimensionality or something like that, is not even a visual representation, when you know what the place is, and how it works.Seems like you didn’t read the cosmology blog or any of the other supporting blogs. Or you did and didn’t understand them. If you did, you wouldn’t be making these claims.
Never cared for this and didn’t speak about this but may as well comment on it. It isn’t the main reason for the 5D timeline. It is only considered good for support. The actual reasons are different. This seems to be a problem you have with the standards. Change the standards if you dislike this. The example doesn’t actually debunk anything.
RoSaT is stated to be a different temporal dimension. Not just a place where time flows differently.
5D Dragonball isn't as outlandish as people think.Mr. Alexander not accepting that other verses can be 5D
yeah, because the comparison is that God of war has its "trascending space and trascending time"statements type thing...dragon ball has none.5D Dragonball isn't as outlandish as people think.
We have God of War at 5D for vague chain scaling.
I see5D Dragonball isn't as outlandish as people think.
We have God of War at 5D for vague chain scaling.
show meCome on, man… Dragon Ball has had "trascending space and time" scans for years.
Dragon ball does not have none.yeah, because the comparison is that God of war has its "trascending space and trascending time"statements type thing...dragon ball has none.
A battle surpassing space-time ( DBS Broly dimension, where Gogeta and Broly distort space-time and fight in another dimension, being cited as being beyond time and space )yeah, because the comparison is that God of war has its "trascending space and trascending time"statements type thing...dragon ball has none.
man, separated by space and time...separated time flow?
then the other dimension is another space and time, not the main oneA battle surpassing space-time ( DBS Broly dimension, where Gogeta and Broly distort space-time and fight in another dimension, being cited as being beyond time and space )
funny that i mentioned all the contradictions to itTranscends dimensions ( afterlife mentioned transcending all dimensions and this includes space-time )
still has no time abilities or time travel with his own speeds, or similar.Transcend space-time ( Beerus mentioned transcending space-time)
yes i knowThere are several mentions of this thing in Dragon Ball, but none of it updates to 5D without a lot of evidence.
exactly, it is in the context of what it is reffering to, because Jiren clearly is not traveling on time with his own powerIirc Jiren was even stated to possess power that transcend time. Of course context points to it meaning he’s highly resistant to time manipulation abilities.
Cry morethen the other dimension is another space and time, not the main one
funny that i mentioned all the contradictions to it
still has no time abilities or time travel with his own speeds, or similar.
yes i know
exactly, it is in the context of what it is reffering to, because Jiren clearly is not traveling on time with his own power
Goku is already Tier 2, can’t have him at Immeasurable speed too. We can only have oneWell if we accepted Goku and Timeskip as not a outliner in one interpretation then technically
Goku is already Tier 2, can’t have him at Immeasurable speed too. We can only have one![]()
there is to much to cry, to much to be angry, to much to hate, and to much to love.Cry more
Goku solos fiction, there's no point in getting nervous.there is to much to cry, to much to be angry, to much to hate, and to much to love.
it is pretty much "i have a better time resistant hax"Well if we accepted Goku and Timeskip as not a outliner in one interpretation then technically
and it will last one hundred years.Goku solos fiction, there's no point in getting nervous.
I'm just responding to the "because Jiren clearly is not traveling on time with his own power" since we actually do count the Goku and timeskip as immeasurable speed, but a outliner and if we didn't count it as a outliner than Jiren would scaleit is pretty much "i have a better time resistant hax"
is note even that it will be a outlier, in my opinion, is not a outlier, the problem is, that the context for that ability is what prevents the immeasurable speed.I'm just responding to the "because Jiren clearly is not traveling on time with his own power" since we actually do count the Goku and timeskip as immeasurable speed, but a outliner and if we didn't count it as a outliner than Jiren would scale
it is pretty much "i have a better time resistant hax"
It was actually agreed upon that Goku overwhelmed Hit’s time travel abilities through raw speed. This would grant Goku immeasurable speed. Though it would obviously be an outlier.is note even that it will be a outlier, in my opinion, is not a outlier, the problem is, that the context for that ability is what prevents the immeasurable speed.
because it is in refference to a time ability, that can be overcome, with a better time resistance, not with speed.
first of all, where?second of all, why?It was actually agreed upon that Goku overwhelmed Hit’s time travel abilities through raw speed. This would grant Goku immeasurable speed. Though it would obviously be an outlier.
first of all, where?second of all, why?
Why is it considered an Outlier? Because of too many inconsistencies and questions come up.
this one sounds like he just used the ability he was supposed to have, not like, Shinra kusakabe style of by passing time stop.Why is it considered Immeasurable Speed? Because Goku who was initially frozen in “Time Travel/Skip/whatever” began moving and keeping up with Hit.
the one comment about infinite speed, except worse because, again many more questions than what is worthWhy is it considered an Outlier? DBS Anime Goku’s profile notes that Goku would have Immeasurable speed because of his encounter with Hit’s abilities. However that leads to too many inconsistencies and questions.
hahaha, i know what you did thereShould’ve been given a “possibly infinite/immeasurable”
It’s ok, soon enough Goku will become Boundless.