• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

LOW 1-A/ 1-A BEN 10

Status
Not open for further replies.
Disagree FRA (mostly for GoofyToddler and Ultima's reasons)
Crazy that people are still appealing to Ultima's debunk even after I pointed out that he didn't even debunk this point and his debunk was for other points, and Rosa explained why this reasoning is as same and as accurate as DC'S low 1-A Crisis Cosmology.
 
Crazy that people are still appealing to Ultima's debunk even after I pointed out that he didn't even debunk this point and his debunk was for other points, and Rosa explained why this reasoning is as same and as accurate as DC'S low 1-A Crisis Cosmology.
No need to be sarcastic
I'm already aware that his point is for another thread, I just disagree with Low 1-A partly due to points he made for that thread.
 
I think this should be Staff Only at this point, in just a day 5 pages filled of people being jumped on for simply not agreeing with that one forced interpretation.
Respectfully, making it staff only is a terrible idea
 
None of the above votes matter (both for agreement as well as disagreement) so better wait for staffs to respond.
 
The term "defies the limits of space and time" suggests that it exists beyond all conventional dimensions of space and time, making it fundamentally incalculable. If a structure is beyond all spatiotemporal dimensions, it cannot be measured or quantified using conventional mathematical or physical frameworks.
This is further reinforced by the second quote: if the "breadth of functionality" of its inhabitants is incomprehensible to lower-dimensional beings, it means their existence operates outside the realm of conventional space, time, and physics making it low 1-A.
There is none of the definition you mentioned in the sentence, or any definitive words that indicate what you mean. It's just an ordinary sentence stating that the place in question is a place outside of space-time that is not dependent on it. You just interpreted it according to your own opinion. What I mean in short is that the sentence in the panel is very simple, it describes a space outside of space-time. As you say, there is no "it exists beyond all conventional dimensions of space and time, making it fundamentally incalculable" situation. This is entirely your interpretation.
it means their existence operates outside the realm of conventional space, time, and physics
Yes, this can mean many things. It may have a different physics than the lower realm (just physics). It could just be different space. Maybe it is 1D and it really cannot be understood from the world below it. It could be any of these, but you're just choosing the one you want without evidence.
If the Ghost Ship universe is beyond all spatiotemporality
Are you serious about "spatiotemporality"? There are no sentences in any of the panels that are close to this or suggest this. Again, you just make things up and see what you want to see. From simple words, you are looking for something very big. You don't even have evidence that the dimensions mentioned are spatial.
 
Your worth is below cereal in that case
This is rude.
no counter argument? thought so...
Been answered below and I still haven't seen a change:
Yeah, I'm honed in for disagreeing but you can interpret it how you like. Stop using “this verse got this, so that means this verse can as well.” If you can formulate something without making a nonsensical comparison then I’ll see to it. If not then I, rather, not be dragged into never-ending segments of disagreements.
 
Try to remain civil and don't be unnecessarily rude or throw insults at one another
Just trying to be sure, this message is not just posted because of verygoofytoddler2's report right? If in that case i want to mention ben 10 fans being called as d*** riders for voting this post and as you can see in almost every high tier ben 10 crt, ben 10 fans are being flamed too, just wanted to mention that 🙂
 
Just trying to be sure, this message is not just posted because of verygoofytoddler2's report right? If in that case i want to mention ben 10 fans being called as d*** riders for voting this post and as you can see in almost every high tier ben 10 crt, ben 10 fans are being flamed too, just wanted to mention that 🙂
ben 10 d riders vs others 💥💥💥💥
And people shamelessly agree with such toxicity but no one points that out @AbaddonTheDisappointment
 
Just trying to be sure, this message is not just posted because of verygoofytoddler2's report right? If in that case i want to mention ben 10 fans being called as d*** riders for voting this post and as you can see in almost every high tier ben 10 crt, ben 10 fans are being flamed too, just wanted to mention that 🙂
It's not just because of the RVR post. I've been watching the thread for a while and it's mostly just been getting progressively more heated. The RVR post was just the last straw since the thread was just slowly devolving into insults
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top