• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All Purpose Dragon Ball Thread

I thought we did just put the dimension granted by the lower tier but "infinitely beyond baseline" or something? I remember Eternity from Marvel used to have something like 6.5D
After the changes with the tiering system, that may not apply. But on that topic I'm not sure.
 
It was to me like... the limit the moment right before things just became stuff piling on stuff. (With what was at the time 1-A being the only thing after that felt super different and maybe a little from high 1-B)
 
Ok, Daima contradicts half of DBS yet it's still canon to both DBS manga and Anime. I'm glad this ends once and for all the absurd attempts of some to canonize Toei for the DBS anime
 
Ok, Daima contradicts half of DBS yet it's still canon to both DBS manga and Anime. I'm glad this ends once and for all the absurd attempts of some to canonize Toei for the DBS anime
I don't feel like it's that bad only real retcon is kabito kia everything else could he worked with in the setting.

(The manga always thought SS3 was stronger then super buu and buuhan I'm sorry it's true the anime was just wrong)
 
I don't feel like it's that bad only real retcon is kabito kia everything else could he worked with in the setting.

(The manga always thought SS3 was stronger then super buu and buuhan I'm sorry it's true the anime was just wrong)
Still enough retcons like the metamoru one to invalidate any possible way of merging Toei with the DBS anime tho
 
Ok, Daima contradicts half of DBS yet it's still canon to both DBS manga and Anime. I'm glad this ends once and for all the absurd attempts of some to canonize Toei for the DBS anime
DBS Anime is continuation of DBZ Kai here tho, so as far as this site is concerned, Toei is......semi canon to DBS Anime, as in, the bits that Kai kept from the og anime
 
DBS Anime is continuation of DBZ Kai here tho, so as far as this site is concerned, Toei is......semi canon to DBS Anime, as in, the bits that Kai kept from the og anime
Indeed that blunder will forever be a mark against this sight until the day it is undone
 
We arent doing ourselves any favors with how we present our arguments, and letting people who disagree misrepresent our points.

I never thought this would go thru tbh
Not really sure how much more simple it could be, as far as tier 1 CRTs go it’s pretty easy to follow.

It’s one step removed from a literal “afterlife is 5D” statement, it’s pretty blatant.
 
We arent doing ourselves any favors with how we present our arguments, and letting people who disagree misrepresent our points.

I never thought this would go thru tbh
Honestly, if people want to disagree, you could bring the Word of God and they'd still find a way to disagree.

Just look at the counterarguments in the thread — all they said was "This isn't enough" without explaining why, until Qaw showed up and suddenly everyone agreed with him.
 
Honestly, if people want to disagree, you could bring the Word of God and they'd still find a way to disagree.

Just look at the counterarguments in the thread — all they said was "This isn't enough" without explaining why, until Qaw showed up and suddenly everyone agreed with him.
'I don't think we should take a statement three translators have said means the afterlife is a higher dimension and upgrade that to an illogical degree by treating it like a higher dimension, btw here's me quoting some unnamed translator no one on this site knows'

Its a bit reductive, but that's more or less the quality of their arguements

'Words can mean a whole bunch of things, I'm gonna ignore where you clarified exactly what this meant and treat your supporting evidence like it's your main arguements'
 
Not to mention the 'I don't feel like it's been portrayed that way' as if thats any sort of actual arguement.

Oh, and creating new requirements out of thin air.
 
'I don't think we should take a statement three translators have said means the afterlife is a higher dimension and upgrade that to an illogical degree by treating it like a higher dimension, btw here's me quoting some unnamed translator no one on this site knows'

Its a bit reductive, but that's more or less the quality of their arguements

'Words can mean a whole bunch of things, I'm gonna ignore where you clarified exactly what this meant and treat your supporting evidence like it's your main arguements'
Well that seems more than a bit reductive. What he said was that transcend is a logical translation, but that it doesn’t have to mean transcend in a way that leads to low 1-c.
 
Back
Top