Professionally, I would expect a topic to be explained on how it is that it's wrong on its lastest arguments against it (unless it became circular) and that there is a consensus on the discussion being over when that happens, preferably with the word of the users making the arguments against the topic (that way we know they have nothing more to say). Not just a stance being outvoted and that's it. More importantly, I would expect the people in the thread voting to understand the things said about the topic in the thread. And around 10 people showed to not be aware of this when given the chance:
Which new comments talk about as well:
Yet you added this to Thor's profile.
You literally had no idea what you were doing in that instance, it's taking down because you made a mistake, not something you should react to by having no interest in engaging with me when considering what I said. That's petty. I would have not taken that into consideration, Sir Ovens talked down to me in this thread more than that because of how wrong he sees me but I didn't consider a reason to engage with him, I'm fine with his comments.
If you're not engaging with me, then logically you would not know if I view you as "people that don’t share [my] viewpoints." You're throwing that out there because it's a narrative thrown around, not because you have a reason to apply it here. If anything it's unbecoming to fall into biases like that that easily.
And that wasn't a "passive aggressive tone," you're projecting based on said narrative. Telling someone who did something very wrong that they have no idea what they're doing is pretty common, it's not something poetic that oversells what they did or praises them in sarcasm, it doesn't express negative feelings, it just talks about their work or actions.
Ok so what what do we define as "demeaning" in this context? I can tell users that they did something wrong if they did something wrong, I can tell them that they did something very wrong if they did something very wrong, and you can technically call that "demeaning," but it's unreasonable to ask others to not do that. If you mean like an insult to them, oversell what they did wrong or sarcasm then I agree that's that's bad.
{Accusation towards another staff member not related to the topic of the thread edited out by Agnaa, for more info read
this post}
----
And I have other issues with what was added, but it's not as clear to see as that and I don't have the energy to go over it. I already talk about it in the thread itself. I kinda don't want to participate in the thread anymore after seeing this, respectfully, it gives me bad faith about what will be agreed on in interpretable things when this happens with objective, and it removes my motivation & makes me tired.
