• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All Purpose Dragon Ball Thread

I thought it was rejected?
No. There was a thread months ago that got moved to Staff Discussion and was rejected but this one is one with new arguments, had permission to be made and hasn't been rejected. It was only temporarily locked because the thread was getting heated and staff needed time to provide their input.

A Low 1-C revision was passed in Staff Discussion after it got locked, which clarifies things and seems to reinforce the arguments made for Low 1-C DB. So I believe Profectus and co. are just observing the Ben 10 Low 1-C revision to see how that plays out before the DB revision is resumed (either reopened or a part 2 thread.)
 
No. There was a thread months ago that got moved to Staff Discussion and was rejected but this one is one with new arguments, had permission to be made and hasn't been rejected. It was only temporarily locked because the thread was getting heated and staff needed time to provide their input.

A Low 1-C revision was passed in Staff Discussion after it got locked, which clarifies things and seems to reinforce the arguments made for Low 1-C DB. So I believe Profectus and co. are just observing the Ben 10 Low 1-C revision to see how that plays out before the DB revision is resumed (either reopened or a part 2 thread.)
the thread fell apart because of an over reliance on DT and Ultima statements, though i've fixed that in my drafted revison of that.
 
Arceus is 6D in his true form and his avatar scales to Low 1-C 5D. Apparently he has some 5D hax after some upgrades but I quit scaling pokemon so Idk
Wow, this is really good, I remember following a thread updating it for this, I really like how pokemon is organized here at vsbttles.
 
Pokémon is like Mario, staff were real quick on ganging up on the verse at the first chance (aka the Canon split).
Hehe, I see Mario topics straight away, but I haven't played much and don't have much knowledge, but where crt happens on is very detailed and without clutter.
 
Pokémon is like Mario, staff were real quick on ganging up on the verse at the first chance (aka the Canon split).
Staff rallying up to downgrade a verse they dont like:
screen-shot-2023-06-04-at-9.29.58-pm.png
 
Does anyone know why Wei Huo is above the DBH characters in the strongest non smurf tip in 2-A?

I'm almost certain that DBH characters can interact with it, and it appears to have no resistance to things like concept type 1, information type 2 and power null.

And I also don't see a sinister cultivation page with 1 trillion things.
 
Does anyone know why Wei Huo is above the DBH characters in the strongest non smurf tip in 2-A?

I'm almost certain that DBH characters can interact with it, and it appears to have no resistance to things like concept type 1, information type 2 and power null.

And I also don't see a sinister cultivation page with 1 trillion things.
Then do a match up with a time power user to prove it is a stomp then ask them to change the list
 
im going to press the button in 10 minutes
Dude, at least try to get opinions from staff members before posting this controversial crt.

Like, send it to someone who has already dealt with hypertimelines, like planck, and ask them for their opinion from the beginning.

Like, send the text to him before sending it to a crt.

We have to have support from the staff right from the start
 
Dude, at least try to get opinions from staff members before posting this controversial crt.

Like, send it to someone who has already dealt with hypertimelines, like planck, and ask them for their opinion from the beginning.

Like, send the text to him before sending it to a crt.

We have to have support from the staff right from the start
that was already done, like a while ago,ive gotten no response though
 
Back
Top