Vs battles wiki pet peeves

[Mr. Bambu]

Makes stuff easier to find as well. Just better to read overall.
I'm not reading a novel, I'm looking at a profile.

I think, if I may want to have improvements, it would be regarding how the abilities are arranged. A P&A section could be arranged chronologically, alphabetically, sorted by similarity or relativity with each abilities, or some others that would be easier to parse when understanding the profiles. Sometimes the abilities are just put together without care as long as its listed there and that makes for a bad profile.

For example, a character may have multiple abilities that can be categorized into three brackets: Observation (say, Analytical Prediction, Precognition, and the like), Combat (Fire Manipulation, Projectile Manipulation, etc.), and Support (Healing, Ability Enhancement, etc). Arranging the abilities in that order would probably make the profile much more readable, but if it's arranged like "Analytical Prediction, Fire Manipulation, Precongition, Ability Enhancement, Projectile Manipulation, and so on) it just looks like a mess.

This goes for both bullet point format and the wall of text format.

I'd rather watch anime than do that.

 

[Metalballrun]

I'd rather watch anime than do that.

Based and redpilled, G.

 

[First_Witch]

I'd rather watch anime than do that.

I can send you a list of animes to watch in a bulletpoint list G

 

[SuperStar]

I'd rather watch anime than do that.

Win Win

 

[SlendVeny]

I insist that you read your favorite book written entirely in bullet point format.

Read your favorite book as one block of text with commas in between, with the chapters separated by one of | these bad boys.

 

[Dragonite007]

I would like I way to see all my commets in a specific thread, mainly in the calc evaluation thread

 

[Deagonx]

I would like I way to see all my commets in a specific thread, mainly in the calc evaluation thread

On a computer, while you are inside the thread, if you click on the search bar, next to the field where you enter text it says "everywhere" and you can click it and change it to "this thread" and then below where it says By: Member you can enter your own username.

 

[Shmooply]

Because it looks better.

I cannot physically COMPREHEND how people see paragraph P&As and Bullet Point P&As and think “yeah, I like blocks of text”.

Me, personally? I blame RPs for making me able to endure reading paragraphs upon paragraphs of nonsense.

 

[Metalballrun]

Having to deal with braindead cosmology wank offsite, now everytime I see cosmology scaling onsite it's mildly annoying. More saddening actually.

These people would read "It's all water under the bridge" in a passage and actually think there is a water under a bridge.

 

[Deagonx]

These people would read "It's all water under the bridge" in a passage and actually think there is a water under a bridge.

You're so right.

 

[SlendVeny]

Having to deal with braindead cosmology wank offsite, now everytime I see cosmology scaling onsite it's mildly annoying. More saddening actually.

These people would read "It's all water under the bridge" in a passage and actually think there is a water under a bridge.

I need to make a thing where a dude punches a guy and goes "it's all water under the bridge" and it's later revealed that he liquefied him.

 

[ZoroNotZolo]

Read your favorite book as one block of text with commas in between, with the chapters separated by one of | these bad boys.

Challenge accepted. Send me a pdf.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Read your favorite book as one block of text with commas in between, with the chapters separated by one of | these bad boys.

I feel reasonably certain I could indeed read my favorite book in this format.

 

[DivineAura44]

I feel reasonably certain I could indeed read my favorite book in this format.

I feel reasonably certain that you are a masochi$t. (Damn this filter is wild )

 

[Mr. Bambu]

I feel reasonably certain that you are a masochi$t. (Damn this filter is wild )

My favorite book is good enough to warrant such pains.

 

[Maizesoup]

Not sure if anyone's mentioned this before, but Universe level+ is a sillier and more confusing name for Low 2-C than just simply calling it Timeline level.

 

[CloverDragon03]

Ngl I hate "Timeline level" for reasons I can't even comprehend myself

Just an inexplicable hatred

 

[Maizesoup]

Fair.

 

[SunDaGamer]

High 3-A should be called "Infinite Universal" and 2-A should be "Infinite Multiversal"

 

[SlendVeny]

Super Universal

 

[DivineAura44]

Not sure if anyone's mentioned this before, but Universe level+ is a sillier and more confusing name for Low 2-C than just simply calling it Timeline level.

Pretty sure people tried to get cosmo (Matter contained inside the universe) and universal (the universe including space and time) but it never panned out. I do agree though, easy to miss a plus somewhere in a statement and suddenly it causes confusion. Also the fact that I put Universe+ Level instead of Universe Level+.

 

[Shmooply]

Having to deal with braindead cosmology wank offsite, now everytime I see cosmology scaling onsite it's mildly annoying. More saddening actually.

These people would read "It's all water under the bridge" in a passage and actually think there is a water under a bridge.

Arguably worse on this site. At least on other battleboards most users believe 2-A is the peak of strength, and will laugh at or ignore whoever starts bringing up dimensions into the mix.

 

[GarrixianXD]

Imagine malding over fictional characters.

 

[Giannysmag]

Imagine malding over fictional characters.

Have you even heard of anime twitter

 

[CloverDragon03]

Have you even heard of anime twitter

Anime Twitter, where randos online treat manga like a contest and the health of the mangakas is used as a point in said contest

 

[GarrixianXD]

Have you even heard of anime twitter

 

[Giannysmag]

Appropriate reaction

 

[ImmortalDread]

I am starting to think creating new rules on staff discussion threads creation, because I am start getting annoyed that random people can create whatever they want in that most important category out of the community.

 

[Giannysmag]

I am starting to think creating new rules on staff discussion threads creation, because I am start getting annoyed that random people can create whatever they want in that most important category out of the community.

Don't you need mod approval to make a thread on staff discussion?

 

[ImmortalDread]

Traditionally-wise, yes, not officially written as far as I am aware, but now I see it as a trend that people can create it whenever they want.

 

[SuperStar]

You should only get permission if it’s a wiki policy thing tbh

 

[ImmortalDread]

You should only get permission if it’s a wiki policy thing tbh

Naw, in general.

I don't want to see any random verse thread in staff category, it's seriously getting annoyed. Staff category ain't a babysitting. Only because you can't behave without involvement of strict moderation of staff members, does not give you a right to convert a thread to a staff thread to silence others from freely expressing their opinion.

 

[GarrixianXD]

I am starting to think creating new rules on staff discussion threads creation, because I am start getting annoyed that random people can create whatever they want in that most important category out of the community.

There already is a rule that you need staff approval before creating threads, as a normal member.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Mind citing it?

 

[GarrixianXD]

Naw, in general.

I don't want to see any random verse thread in staff category, it's seriously getting annoyed. Staff category ain't a babysitting. Only because you can't behave without involvement of strict moderation of staff members, does not give you a right to convert a thread to a staff thread to silence others from freely expressing their opinion.

Threads regarding mass changes to controversial verses should be in Staff Discussions such as tier upgrades to God of War and Dragon Ball.

Mind citing it?

It already displays that only staff members are allowed to participate in their discussion, which includes creating threads.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Garrixian, it was a simple request. I asked you to cite any rule from discussion rules that matches of what we are discussing, you did not. Simply say, there are no rules.

It already displays that only staff members are allowed to participate in their discussion, which includes creating threads.

Cite it?

 

[KingNanaya]

Garrixian, it was a simple request. I asked you to cite any rule from discussion rules that matches of what we are discussing, you did not. Simply say, there are no rules.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Nothing here talks about thread creations and its permission. Yall are just trying to disagree to disagree or argue to argue.

 

[KingNanaya]

Nothing here talks about thread creations and its permission. Yall are just trying to disagree to disagree or argue to argue.

Board activity is allowed for VS Battles wiki staff and highly trusted members

it says it right there that only staff and trusted members. if you mean that it should specify what "trusted" and "activity" means, then that's one thing. but I find it pretty clear on it's own

 

[GarrixianXD]

Nothing here talks about thread creations and its permission. Yall are just trying to disagree to disagree or argue to argue.

You're free to clarify with an admin if you like but "board activity" generally means all activity, including thread creations.