BlastX
He/Him- 5,136
- 2,679
Buutenks is just Super Buu x2.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
DB Toei - About Buuhan's Tier 2 rating
- Thread starter Ultima_Reality
- Start date
- Status
- 957
- 1,296
- 5,976
- 5,829
Tbf the same thing happens in the manga and so that specific instance isn't ridiculous
- 624
- 1,146
I think he's referring to Super Buu and SSJ3 Gotenks being relative in strength, so when he absorbs Gotenks it's a 1+1 = 2 thing
BlastX
He/Him- 5,136
- 2,679
Yeh, pretty much.
- 957
- 1,296
If we say thats the case I'm guessing the characters who downscale like that get the "at most low multi" rating some of the Super cast used to have? Sounds fine
- 11,464
- 1,808
No because the at most is for 2 Universes rather than 3
- 957
- 1,296
I see. So every Super Buu tier and higher character gets 2-C?
- 9,061
- 9,339
- 6,393
- 6,455
Scaling derail gang back at it again.
- 32,811
- 38,013
- 10,004
- 3,424
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,366
- 3,313
What’s the point of accepting the feat if the scaling implies it’s an outlier? Scaling and feat quantification are linked, I don’t think making a site wide policy banning those discussions happening in the same thread is productive, it’ll just create thread spam and fatigue.
but we really should wait for scaling until after the feat has been accepted at least
but we really should wait for scaling until after the feat has been accepted at least
- 3,342
- 4,387
i highly doubt it’s an outlier
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,366
- 3,313
No I’m talking in general, I’m responding to people wanting to make a “site wide rule” not a DB rule.
- 5,976
- 5,829
One more staff acceptance
- 10,004
- 3,424
@Damage3245 seems to disagree, so even with 3 agrees we would need more discussion don't even start, i also do not like this anymore than any of you, i actually agree with this now
- 3,342
- 4,387
Asking questions isn’t disagreeing unless Damage tells us he disagrees
- 10,004
- 3,424
posts like these: https://vsbattles.com/threads/db-toei-about-buuhans-tier-2-rating.152322/post-5663432 https://vsbattles.com/threads/db-toei-about-buuhans-tier-2-rating.152322/post-5663447
does imply that he disagrees
does imply that he disagrees
- 3,342
- 4,387
So asking a question means you disagree? Ultima answered his question and Damage hasn’t given a response since then I don’t see anything saying he disagrees
- 9,863
- 10,614
We cannot go with assumptions, he has to tell us directly if he disagrees, it doesn't have to be debated. We can move on. Interpretation can be done on both end so no.
DivineAura44
He/Him- 4,673
- 3,006
Still not how it works.
- 10,004
- 3,424
- 10,004
- 3,424
do you agree or disagree yet?
DivineAura44
He/Him- 4,673
- 3,006
Bro what is gonna happen if we just wait a day? Y'all mfs need some patience.
- 32,811
- 38,013
I will tag some more staff to take a look.
@Elizhaa @DemonGodMitchAubin @Planck69 @LordTracer @Emirp sumitpo
@Elizhaa @DemonGodMitchAubin @Planck69 @LordTracer @Emirp sumitpo
- 9,863
- 10,614
- 9,061
- 9,339
I cannot leave this thread even for a few hours or the derails pile on, huh.
@DivineAura44 You literally came here making unnecessary and derailing comments. Stop it.
@omegabronic This is your second official warning on a DB thread for derailing. Come on, man. You know better than this.
@DivineAura44 You literally came here making unnecessary and derailing comments. Stop it.
@omegabronic This is your second official warning on a DB thread for derailing. Come on, man. You know better than this.
- 9,061
- 9,339
As I also said in the thread even downgrading the environmental destruction, I am overall neutral on Buuhan stuff.
- 9,061
- 9,339
If you know a certain topic is already derailing, don't respond to it. If you still want to discuss it, bring it to their walls/PM/discussion thread.
Edit:
- 2,992
- 1,979
Has there been any explanation for why Buu had to tear down the barriers of reality to destroy the universe instead of just outright destroying it like SSG Goku could? Or is that just being chalked up to SSG Goku being far more powerful? I'm just not really understanding why a 2-C being would actively need to destroy the macrocosm via a flooding rather than just blowing it all up.
- 29,924
- 25,081
At the moment I'd describe myself as being more neutral but leaning against a solid 2-C rating.
- 14,769
- 20,643
(*She)
But yeah I’m no longer interested in participating in big AP revisions for this verse.
- 10,400
- 5,239
I'm sorry for confusing you, little sister! But thanks for clarifying for us :3
- 3,566
- 877
This should upgrade also upgrade Buutenks and Gohan and every other character who scales to them
- Status
