• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Ben 10 - infinite 5D Timestream proposal

Status
Not open for further replies.
the unknown distance is the reason why we can't quantify the multiplier to destroy 2 universes instead of 1
Sure, it is considered "unknown" for our standards unless the fiction show that it is known and considerable.

Having infinite distance between universes doesn't actually matter for tier 1,
Distance btw timelines if Infinite then 5d because then it would be something "known".
 
Lemme clear it, distances between timelines aren't 4d or anything. It's a 5d axis. So any significant amount of gap will qualify it for low 1c.
 
Wait, that's the reasoning here? Yeah, that won't work at all. Just existing in a presumed higher dimensional axis isn't enough for Low 1-C at all. All actions that significantly affect more than one space-time continuum breach this axis yet you don't see a mass upgrade of every 2-C to 2-A to Tier 1.

If the fundamental basis of the upgrade is just "it exists in a 5-dimensional axis because our non-canon tiering system says so, therefore it is Low 1-C" then I see little reason to continue with this thread.
 
Wait, that's the reasoning here? Yeah, that won't work at all. Just existing in a presumed higher dimensional axis isn't enough for Low 1-C at all. All actions that significantly affect more than one space-time continuum breach this axis yet you don't see a mass upgrade of every 2-C to 2-A to Tier 1.
That's because it is unknown and considered insignificant by default as per our tiering system in case of 2a.

If the fundamental basis of the upgrade is just "it exists in a 5-dimensional axis because our non-canon tiering system says so, therefore it is Low 1-C" then I see little reason to continue with this thread
Consider it non canon, fan made, wrong or whatever doesn't really matter, it's our standards and we have to go with it.
 
it exists in a 5-dimensional axis because our non-canon tiering system says so, therefore it is Low 1-C" then I see little reason to continue with this thread.
the distance between two timelines is defined as the 5th dimension (Or a 4th spatial dimension) that separates two or more universes. Said distance is often unknown as it could be anywhere between much smaller than the Universal radius and infinite. But such details are only known to those who can travel through additional spatial dimensions. For that reason, crossing Universes is unquantifiable for speed unless details are specifically stated.
This is quoted from the Speed Page of VSBW.
 
the distance between two timelines is defined as the 5th dimension (Or a 4th spatial dimension) that separates two or more universes. Said distance is often unknown as it could be anywhere between much smaller than the Universal radius and infinite. But such details are only known to those who can travel through additional spatial dimensions. For that reason, crossing Universes is unquantifiable for speed unless details are specifically stated.
This is quoted from the Speed Page of VSBW.
Very based 💀
 
That's because it is unknown and considered insignificant by default as per our tiering system in case of 2a.
Thats only the case of tier 2

If you prove the distance is infinite, that simply means a 2C is infinitely superior to a low 2C

And as said by planck, this logic would upgrade every single 2C, 2B and 2A to low 1C
 
the distance between two timelines is defined as the 5th dimension (Or a 4th spatial dimension) that separates two or more universes. Said distance is often unknown as it could be anywhere between much smaller than the Universal radius and infinite. But such details are only known to those who can travel through additional spatial dimensions. For that reason, crossing Universes is unquantifiable for speed unless details are specifically stated.
This is quoted from the Speed Page of VSBW.
Doesn't apply to tier 1 as explained before, unless you think destroying 2 universes is low 1C
 
Thats only the case of tier 2

If you prove the distance is infinite, that simply means a 2C is infinitely superior to a low 2C

And as said by planck, this logic would upgrade every single 2C, 2B and 2A to low 1C
Sus, there is something wrong in the reasoning. The size of the 4d timelines is just amount 0 in the 5d axis that said any amount of distance significant enough to infinite or even any finite that is significant would amount uncountably many universes or aleph2, that's low 1c.

And it wouldn't upgrade any verse, not unless the distances between said universes are shown to be calculable or known to be of significant size.
 
You see, even infinite timelines are just 0 on 5d axis but as they must be seprated, they are thought to be seprated in a insignificant 5d axis.
 
So what's youre point exactly?
Visuals, which has been supported by what paradox explained, can be used, proceeding to show that alternate timelines that are branching off perpendicular to the main timeline and non parallel as well in all directions of 5d space, proves that 5d space is infinite.
 
Not unless its literally uncountably infinite
Yes that's what I described, any amount of 5d space containing timelines if significant will be uncountably infinite number of times higher than our 4d timeline as they will always amount zero.
Look above even other ppl have described the same thing.
Universes on 5d axis will always be 0 even if number is infinite. Unless they are placed at considerable distance or number of universes is uncountably higher.
I'm no mathematician or physicist but...
If so that's Infinite^Infinite therefore 5D low 1-C to my understanding...
 
Only thing was that if I can use the visuals, considering supported by what paradox said. Yes it can be used.
 
This still isn't tier 1 though? Like how is it uncountably infinite exactly? All i see is at best above baseline 2A
 
This still isn't tier 1 though? Like how is it uncountably infinite exactly? All i see is at best above baseline 2A
I'll do few questions, answer that and your judgement will be clear.

Is distroying infinite^infinite or aleph1 or uncountably infinite number of universes is low 1c?
 
I'll do few questions, answer that and your judgement will be clear.

Is distroying infinite^infinite or aleph1 or uncountably infinite number of universes is low 1c?
Misleading question, i said i don't see how the evidence presented is any of those

Yes those are all tier 1 but how is the evidence presented is any of them
 
Misleading question, i said i don't see how the evidence presented is any of those

Yes those are all tier 1 but how is the evidence presented is any of them
Have patience.
Second question, will timelines have any amount greater than 0 on 5d axis regardless if you take infinite number of them? Like if you take infinite number of 2d papers and align them on 3d axis will they have any amount?
 
Have patience.
Second question, will timelines have any amount greater than 0 on 5d axis regardless if you take infinite number of them? Like if you take infinite number of 2d papers and align them on 3d axis will they have any amount?
Well, yes, but the amount they occupy is infinitely close to 0
 
Well, yes, but the amount they occupy is infinitely close to 0
Yes, that means they will all can be arranged in a 5d space where they will have almost no gap, you see it's insignificant.

Now 3rd question, if they are arranged in a 5d axis in which each universes are seprated by infinite distance on that 5d axis, doesn't it means that if you can destroy those 2 universes then you are actually capable of destroying uncountably infinite number of universes? I mean even insignificant 5d axis can contain infinite number of universes and here we are talking about universes that are separated by infinite distance on 5d axis.
 
Just like destroying two galaxies with the default distance they have between each other is far greater feat than destroying 2 galaxiess that close to no gap.
 
Yes, that means they will all can be arranged in a 5d space where they will have almost no gap, you see it's insignificant.

Now 3rd question, if they are arranged in a 5d axis in which each universes are seprated by infinite distance on that 5d axis, doesn't it means that if you can destroy those 2 universes then you are actually capable of destroying uncountably infinite number of universes? I mean even insignificant 5d axis can contain infinite number of universes and here we are talking about universes that are separated by infinite distance on 5d axis.
This goes back to the "then every 2C is low 1C" issue, every tier 2 character is effecting 5d space, infinite or not
 
This goes back to the "then every 2C is low 1C" issue, every tier 2 character is effecting 5d space, infinite or not
It wouldn't, low 2c or 2a is a insignificant 5d structure as has been explained by donttalkdt in the eternal timeline thread and Planck in the above posts, while low 1c is a significant 5d.
So there is a significant difference.
 
Donttalkdt quote
Infinite multiverse would still be 5D on an insignificant scale (you can cram infinite 3+1D timelines into an arbitrarily, but not infinitely, small 5D volume). Meanwhile Low 1-C starts at 5D power of significant magnitude.

So there is a significant difference.
.

And planks quote is above saying same thing.
 
It wouldn't, low 2c or 2a is a insignificant 5d structure as has been explained by donttalkdt in the eternal timeline thread and Planck in the above posts, while low 1c is a significant 5d.
So there is a significant difference.
Infinite universes with infinite distance between them don't seem as low 1C to me

But thats just me, contact knowledgeable people and see their opinion
 
Infinite universes with infinite distance between them don't seem as low 1C to me

But thats just me, contact knowledgeable people and see their opinion
I did, straight to ultima. No comment yet. And as per my reasoning and what donttalkdt have said and even going with tiering system, it qualifies.
 
I did, straight to ultima. No comment yet. And as per my reasoning and what donttalkdt have said and even going with tiering system, it qualifies.
I don't think it qualifies, but sure

If the staff agree, then be it
 
I am closing this thread anyway, I don't think any staff will stand as opposition here anymore, just straight disagreement with not defending their reasoning, at best I'll have to wait for days for their 2 to 3 counter replies which will yet have no substance but air words. It also has got enough meme'd since very start. Will just create a fresh thread better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top