Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, the site nuked the conceptual thing being special long ago, at best you get Low 1-C from thisIs transcending the concepts of time and space still enough to get too the Outerversal tier?
Its actually beyond Tier 0 but won't get acceptedIs transcending the concepts of time and space still enough to get too the Outerversal tier?
It would be 1a if you transcend the concept of space time to any kind of degree.Is transcending the concepts of time and space still enough to get too the Outerversal tier?
No, it will be 1-A if the context prove transcened the concept of space-time at all degree and level, you can't be Low 1-A with that kind of contextDepends on the context but you can probably atleast reach L1-A if you transcend it to any kind of degree.
(Like what the guy said above)
Why not Tier 0? Tier 0 is still bound by the concept of spaceNo, it will be 1-A if the context prove transcened the concept of space-time at all degree and level, you can't be Low 1-A with that kind of context
I said atleast L1-A anyways how so?you can't be Low 1-A with that kind of context
Tier 0 in a sense is not bound by space because of it being bigger than real coordinate space.Why not Tier 0? Tier 0 is still bound by the concept of space
Its still bound by the concept of spaceTier 0 in a sense is not bound by space because of it being bigger than real coordinate space.
It is not bound by the concept of space because of space being only Aleph 1 at mathematics at best, you could consider Aleph 2 to bigger cardinals dimensionallity a extended space i guess, but still not bound by it in a way.Its still bound by the concept of space
Why are you omnipresent in all Questions and AnswersDepends on the context but you can probably atleast reach L1-A if you transcend it to any kind of degree.
(Like what the guy said above)
Tier 0 here is kinda weak lol, they are still bound by spaceTier 0 in a sense is not bound by space because of it being bigger than real coordinate space.
WdymWhy are you omnipresent in all Questions and Answers
Unbound by real coordinate space though.Tier 0 here is kinda weak lol, they are still bound by space
Aleph 2 dimensions is still part of space because thats aleph 2 number of spatial dimensionsIt is not bound by the concept of space because of space being only Aleph 1 at mathematics at best, you could consider Aleph 2 to bigger cardinals dimensionallity a extended space i guess, but still not bound by it in a way.
Yes but still unbound by it in a way since the main concept of Aleph 2 is being bigger than any lower alephs real coordinate space is at best Aleph 1 so Aleph 2 is completely unreachable to the main limits of space.Aleph 2 dimensions is still part of space because thats aleph 2 number of spatial dimensions
Why is being bigger than "any lower alephs" mean you're unreachable by "main limits of space"? Where is this main limit from?Yes but still unbound by it in a way since the main concept of Aleph 2 is being bigger than any lower alephs real coordinate space is at best Aleph 1 so Aleph 2 is completely unreachable to the main limits of space.
The aleph 2 spaces yatta yatta are just extended versions(technically) that is completely unbound by real coordinate space which mainly where space revolves at and bassically the biggest space can get by themselves.
It is because of real coordinate space this space is the biggest space can get without invoking higher alephs and extending it.Why is being bigger than "any lower alephs" mean you're unreachable by "main limits of space"? Where is this main limit from?
How can that be the biggest space can get by itself?
it is still bound by spaceIt is because of real coordinate space this space is the biggest space can get without invoking higher alephs and extending it.
Aleph 2 is mainly unreachable to space because of it being completely bigger than any space corresspondance real coordinate space can have.
Space reaching 1a and so is clearly just it being extended so 1a is a space beyond space type of thing.
Also unbound by any limitation space has so unbound by it in a way.it is still bound by space
it's not unbound, it is still boundAlso unbound by any limitation space has so unbound by it in a way.
It is unbound limitations of real coordinate space so we can assume it being unbound in a way.it's not unbound, it is still bound
no we can'tIt is unbound limitations of real coordinate space so we can assume it being unbound in a way.
I'll stop arguing for now, this is going nowhere.no we can't
It is because of real coordinate space this space is the biggest space can get without invoking higher alephs and extending it.
Aleph 2 is mainly unreachable to space because of it being completely bigger than any space corresspondance real coordinate space can have.
Space reaching 1a and so is clearly just it being extended so 1a is a space beyond space type of thing.
It is because of real coordinate space this space is the biggest space can get without invoking higher alephs and extending it.
Aleph 2 is mainly unreachable to space because of it being completely bigger than any space corresspondance real coordinate space can have.
Space reaching 1a and so is clearly just it being extended so 1a is a space beyond space type of thing.
HereSource?
Source?
It means it is unbound by it in a way.What does this have to do with anything
If you're gonna give whole ass wikipedia articles that don't even mention what you say, then I can tooHere
![]()
Real coordinate space - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
And here
![]()
Aleph number - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
If you're gonna give whole ass wikipedia articles that don't even mention what you say, then I can too
I said in a way though, and i am technically not wrong.Here's proof you're wrong
what does that mean? Because you said before that, that wouldn't work. "No, the site nuked the conceptual thing being special long ago, at best you get Low 1-C from this.'No, it will be 1-A if the context prove transcened the concept of space-time at all degree and level, you can't be Low 1-A with that kind of contextwhat
normally, if there is just a transcending concept of space-time alone, no futher explaination, context, etc.................. you hardly get any tier due to the site nuke the conceptual thing being special long ago, back then transcending concept was treated pretty high, which could get you tier 1-A to 0 like KING said. However nowaday it is not, while you still can get soemthing from transcending concept, you need extremely good evidences, in-deep explaination, contexts, etc... to get tier like 1-A to 0what does that mean? Because you said before that, that wouldn't work. "No, the site nuked the conceptual thing being special long ago, at best you get Low 1-C from this.'
May I know why they got nuked? I am still wondering how boundless beings are still bound by space if they fully transcend the concept of time and space? It just makes no sense to me. One is who is beyond the concept of spacetime aka but still bound by it...normally, if there is just a transcending concept of space-time alone, no futher explaination, context, etc.................. you hardly get any tier due to the site nuke the conceptual thing being special long ago, back then transcending concept was treated pretty high, which could get you tier 1-A to 0 like KING said. However nowaday it is not, while you still can get soemthing from transcending concept, you need extremely good evidences, in-deep explaination, contexts, etc... to get tier like 1-A to 0
They don'tI am still wondering how boundless beings are still bound by space if they fully transcend the concept of time and space?
@Bernkastelll still says they are bound by space (which I feel he is saying it ironically but unsure)They don't
They are. Im saying they dont transcend the concepts of space and time completely.@Bernkastelll still says they are bound by space (which I feel he is saying it ironically but unsure)
Clarify? When someone explicitly shows that he transcends the concept of time and space completely and is beyond it, how boundless character is still bound by that?They are. Im saying they dont transcend the concepts of space and time completely.
Read the tiering system. Nowhere does it say that they transcend the concept of space and time.Clarify. When someone explicitly shows that he transcends the concept of time and space completely and is beyond it, how boundless character is still bound by that?
Ofc nowhere it says... my question still stands, how boundless character is still bound by space if he transcends the concept of space?Read the tiering system. Nowhere does it say that they transcend the concept of space and time.
They are just a very high number of dimensions (Inaccessible Cardinals and stuff)
They don't (not completely)if he transcends the concept of space?
As specified above, a "dimension" is nothing more than a set of values representing a given direction within a system, and a multi-dimensional space can itself be thought of as a multiplication of several "copies" of these sets. For instance, the 3-dimensional space in which we live is often visualized as the set of all 3-tuples of real numbers (Thus, taking its values from the real number line, R), and is thus the result of the iterated multiplication: R x R x R = R³, likewise, 4-dimensional space is the set of all 4-tuples of real numbers, and is thus equal to R x R x R x R = R⁴, and so on and so forth.
Practically speaking, this means that there is no limit for the number of dimensions which a space can have whatsoever, and one can construct spaces whose dimension corresponds to any cardinal number, including the infinite ones mentioned above. It is not even necessary for us to restrict ourselves to values taken from the real numbers, either: It is also possible to define the space of all n-tuples of cardinal numbers (Which takes its values from V, the class of all sets)
As a result, it is not at all feasible to take any statements involving a character existing "beyond dimensions" at face value, as this would lead to extremely inflated ratings largely dependent on No-Limits Fallacies. Therefore, such descriptors are to be evaluated while taking into account the number of dimensions which the verse has been shown to entertain; for example, a character stated to exist above physical dimensions in relation to a 4-dimensional cosmology would be Low 1-C with no further context.