1.Is transcending infinite amounts of Regular space-time continuum still 5D?
Yes, though just transcending one is 5D too under certain context.
2.is fate manipulation bound by dimensionality? Do you have to prove that the character's fate manipulation is at a certain dimension tier Immortality in order to use it on Higher dimensional beings?
Yes. "Fate" is treated as "Future", whereas "Future" is an aspect of Time, whereas Time has levels. Though it depends on how it's depicted in-verse, since what the verse calls "Fate" could be something else in our terms.
3.Do outerversal Characters have a ontology and are they still a Concept?
I'm not sure what the question is supposed to be, but if you meant whether they have a different ontology or not, then yes, they do. Not sure what you mean by concept part.
4.is transcending a infinite spatial dimension H1-B? or transcending Infinite amounts of spatial dimensions H1-B?
First is just +1D. Like how a 2D structure transcends the spatial dimensio of a 1D construct as far as size and extensions go.
Latter is what is High 1-B+. High 1-B is an infinite amount of higher dimensions (spatial, temporal, or both depending on context) while high 1-B+ is transcending that as a whole structure.
5.What are outerversal "Frameworks" Are they used to define a qualification for outerversal?
Outerversal frameworks are basically ontologically/qualitatively higher frameworks. For example, "more real" is a quality commonly associated with higher ontology.
And yes, although each layer of outerversal has its own qualitatively higher frameworks of dimensionality, all the outer layers still apply to a specific framework as a whole, such as the framework of "real-ness" which dictates the difference in 1-A layers.
6.Does outerversal Have different types of qualifications? Aka different ways to achieve it
Yes. Being more real, being completely transcendent of non 1-A not due to size but due to ontology, being a certain type of Monad, etc. There are many ways.
7.why is transcending dimensionality low 1-a but transcending the concepts of it Is 1-A?
Transcending dimensionality can be both low 1-A and 1-A depending on context. It is indexed as low 1-A when transcending dimensionality is by extension of size, which is the default assumption, while it's 1-A if it both transcends and lacks dimensionality (like a background canvas that lacks space and time but is also bigger than space-time).
The concept of Dimensionality, by nature, would hold all possible extensions of dimensionality unless proven otherwise, whether as potential objects or actual objects participating in its idea of dimensionality. That itself is already Low 1-A, so transcending that would naturally be 1-A (unless anti feats are present, which could lead to it only being tiered at layers into low 1-A or aby lower tier)
8.Why is "Transcending" considered to be a Vague statement? (According to the FAQ page)
Because the word "transcend" can mean many things. It can mean "to move from one point to another", "to cross a boundary", "to go beyond a structure", or "to be beyond it's size". Concluding it's the latter without any context would be considered high balling.
9.does transcending ALL concepts that exist scale you to high outerversal or boundless or below?
That can either depend on cosmology or on the statement itself.
For example, transcending all "logically possible concepts" by extension of size is high 1-A+ (since the set of all logical possibilities is ultimately bigger than any arbitrarily large logical possibility). On the other hand, transcending all logically possible concepts by extension of ontology is tier 0 unless anti feats are present.
On the other hand, if the "all concepts" are limited to a specific type, such as all concepts within space and time, all type 2 concepts, all type 1 concepts, etc. can be put at varying tiers depending on cosmology.
10.Does destorying a concept make you 1-A?
No. It doesn't give you any tier unless you're destroying a concept that is 1-A itself, which is not always the case.
A concept can be limited to any area, even as small as a room, or be as large as a universe and beyond in its area of encompassment. Plus it depends on the type of concept you're destroying. Destroying the concept of space and time would theoretical put you at minimum tier 2, but destroying the concept of apples won't.
