• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hello!

Would you mind evaluating this thread? Since you helped with the last major Murder Drones CRT. (Needs one more vote to pass)

Every major point that has been contested:
Hello, would you be able to look at this lookism AP revision/downgrade

While I'm not caring about most of the other calculations, one of the brought up points was the usage of depth-to-diameter ratios typically from meteor impacts on the moon. I wanted to see what a CGM's opinion on this would be.
Hello, would you be able to look at this lookism AP revision/downgrade

While I'm not caring about most of the other calculations, one of the brought up points was the usage of depth-to-diameter ratios typically from meteor impacts on the moon. I wanted to see what a CGM's opinion on this would be.
Hello, would you be able to look at this lookism AP revision/downgrade

While I'm not caring about most of the other calculations, one of the brought up points was the usage of depth-to-diameter ratios typically from meteor impacts on the moon. I wanted to see what a CGM's opinion on this would be.
Vietthai i have a question


IMG-8472.jpg


In my thread you said this but the OP actually goes against this as applicable and it wasnt agreed upon yet it was still applied to the profile. Is it still applicable even though the OP goes against this and other staff didnt agree to this?
Mbpoops
Mbpoops
Vietthai96
Vietthai96
So anyway, you can ask on All-purpose request about this situation for the ability removal, write the reason why it should be removed, or make a thread to address the ability
Mbpoops
Mbpoops
alright thank you
Can we bring back cm1?
We know that gods are eternal and never die, and that their effects on the body will not affect any concepts.

They were only possessing temporary vessels anyway, so no matter what happened to the vessel itself, it wouldn't affect their existence as gods in the slightest

The complete slaying of a god is the destruction of the very concept of existence.
“Oh? I see you have changed your approach. You are now attempting to kill the very concept of my being. Of course, killing this vessel means little,so that is the correct path to take, but is it something you are capable of?
Underhanded tactics like killing the concept of a person only works if you
alone are capable of doing it
Even eliminating their existence is not enough to completely kill the god.
“I told you from the beginning I intended to kill you. All that remained
was to see how much of a fight you put up. If you had fought until the end, I
would have at least asked your name. Die.”
Having lost interest, she killed the man, erasing his existence. At the same
The UEG had never considered that. She had believed gods were
indestructible, eternal beings. She had killed any number of gods, but death
was just another state of being for them, one from which they would
eventually recover.
UEG killed many gods, but those gods didn't die completely. Because of this, a powerful attack like erasing their existence wasn't enough to kill a god completely, and it didn't affect their concepts; it only affected the object of their concepts.

The gods can kill the concept of a person's existence, and the yogurt that destroyed that concept should be returned. Concept mani type1 ?

What do you think?
Hello. Sorry to bother but I have a thread going on and obviously staff is needed.


This thread (fortunately not too long to read for verifying) is going back and forth in just one argument going deep about Enhanced Senses, could i please ask for an input of yours in it?
SomebodyData
SomebodyData
Looks like First Witch handled it, but feel free to let me know if something else arises!
Nonynho
Nonynho
Tell me if i can have a tad bit more of your time, please!

This thread (fortunately not too long to read for verifying) is going back and forth in just one argument going deep about Enhanced Senses, could i please ask for an input of yours in it?
Nonynho
Nonynho
Not to be a bother, but the question is basically if certain character's description of Enhanced Senses say "his senses are tens of times better than a regular human and his vision acuity dozens of times better" = he's most likely able to passively view someone from SBA's top starting distance
Hello, mind check this CRT? He's already 1 month old
Hey, Bambu. I'd appreciate your input here. It's not really a CRT, so there's nothing to approve.

Can you please give your opinion on my thread I need one more staff member.


This thread (fortunately not too long to read for verifying) is going back and forth in just one argument going deep about Enhanced Senses, could i please ask for an input of yours in it?
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
My gut instinct would be "no" because the Earth just curves to the point of you not being able to see them, visibility itself isn't really the problem.
Nonynho
Nonynho
Well, this always was clearly a mismatch

I can't know who would be the most "countable" as winner as either shortening the distance makes this one-sided towards side A and leaving as is makes this one-sided towards side B
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
high hax battles often be like that

This thread (fortunately not too long to read for verifying) is going back and forth in just one argument going deep about Enhanced Senses, could i please ask for an input of yours in it?
Twilight can you check out this short crt please. It has 2 staff votes and only needs 1 more 🙏
Could you see this?
I'd appreciate if you take a look at my thread.

Can you truly be a harem king if you're a part of mine?
  • Like
Reactions: Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
Yes, I can still be one, because the lover part in romance goes both ways, i.e., he is hers and she is his, so they belong to each other. So, I can still be part of a harem and truly be a harem king.
Grabbing_dragon
Grabbing_dragon
Man, it sucks that there aren’t many harems where the girls are not only in a romantic relationship with the MC but also with each other, because that’s what I see as a complete harem.
Can help evaluate this CRT?
SomebodyData
SomebodyData
Sorry, looks like I wasn't able to comment in time!
can help evaluate this CRT
Asking opinion of CGM.

Susie is stated by narrator to be able to block sound waves before they reach Lancer. She could react only after Ralsei starts talking.

Can this statement be used to grant Susie (and her equals) low end subsonic perception (0.0291s), and use it in calcs?
Qurbonboev
Qurbonboev
Made it into CGM thread:
Asking opinion of CGM.

Susie is stated by narrator to be able to block sound waves before they reach Lancer. She could react only after Ralsei starts talking.

Can this statement be used to grant Susie (and her equals) low end subsonic perception (0.0291s), and use it in calcs?
TheRustyOne
TheRustyOne
Personally, I wouldn't do that.

I wouldn't be surprised if there are counterpoints. Standards aren't the most stable lately, so I cannot say for certain.

You can ask someone if you want.
Qurbonboev
Qurbonboev
Made it into CGM thread:
Asking opinion of CGM.

Susie is stated by narrator to be able to block sound waves before they reach Lancer. She could react only after Ralsei starts talking.

Can this statement be used to grant Susie (and her equals) low end subsonic perception (0.0291s), and use it in calcs?
Qurbonboev
Qurbonboev
Made it into CGM thread:
Dataa
Goodmorning (since it'll be prolly morning when u wake up and see this)

So while Alex made his thread that you recently commented on, mine is also pending with 1 approval so far

Some of the stuff we discussed on discord is there, plus some more arguments suggested by other participants. Imo the arguments related to spirits are particularly strong.

Would appreciate your input :d
Thanks as always!
Yo, if I make a sub tier 2 verse and add a physiology from the get go, do I have to make a CRT first?
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
You can make a verse page without input, but a physiology page requires approval since it's a non-profile page that would need to be added.
Arceus0x
Arceus0x
Thank you
Hey qawsedf234, can i answer your comment in this Staff discussion thread

or else i can ask here, but it was if someone else wanted to contribute (thread is kinda abandoned tho, i think with unapplied changes)

in your comment, you talk about a KE rule for lifting strength feats, for example a Class G lifting strength Feat of a character jumping, it should have decent kind of destruction to make it valid, like how KE feats needs to show at least some degree of destruction like breaking the ground, or destroying buildings

but what about other feats about not about enviromental impacts, but that the speed seems to be why its strong?

for example, in this Feat, Yoru from chainsaw Man spins a spear at speeds so high that no parts of the Devil get throught it, if assuming the Devil has superhuman speed, then the spear spinning is around supersonic

the fact that the limbs of the devil get destroyed, may be because of the sheer KE of the spear spinning, in this case the Devils durability getting overwhelmed by the spear is due to a showing of KE in the spear

its enviromental impact still needed?
Didn't your CRT only try to remove 3500C? Not the entire heat hax which made Niffty who is resistant steam.

Btw I couldn't even reply to that. Pretty good.
StrymULTRA
StrymULTRA
The thing is that the entire heat hax is based on Pentious' stuff, and it has no basics.

BUT looking back I think it could have veen fixed with just a justification change, yes.

Btw I couldn't even reply to that. Pretty good.

I mean you can always try to make a counter CRT given it did not have opposition so...
ShionAH
ShionAH
Fix it.
StrymULTRA
StrymULTRA
Bro I just did that chill 😭
Could you pls check out and evaluate this crt
Since that CRT passed should the feat in the current AP blog be updated now, and by extension have all the tiers/stats on the profiles updated, or should that be put off for a future revision you got incase?
I know you may be bombarded by other calcs around as well, but could you please check out this calc as soon as you can and see if the math checks out

The height initially was wrong by the calcer, tried to fix it myself with the correct one, but dont know if it succeeded

And I need it for a CRT in regards to speed
Back
Top