• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

What's new Featured content New posts New media New media comments New profile posts Latest activity
HI , i just read your post in delete wukong profile. You still use the bad translation. I recommend to use the better translation.
For example, the 72 spell and 32 , 18 spell are base on taoist world: low world are earth, middle world are cloud world, and high world are sky.
Also the transation of Ganges’ sands. What does it even mean. That is a scene when all the deity leave, it just show you how beatifull it is. . And it is normal. Do i need to upload the full page
Next time upload the full page.
That translation also suck.
This is why i told you to upload full page, this is why feat this this exist ( fly to the end heaven , have 72 live, erase his name , ...etc..) .
IF this continue, wukong still have the same problem before
View previous comments…
Udlmaster
Udlmaster
It's not a feat. No one was using it as a feat. That's what I'm getting at.
Kamenrider0001000
So with that one word , you think the author know a lot about buddhism. I will wait for your post then. Also please research Taoist too, i may contradict to buddhism. You can call me for help . Bye
Udlmaster
Udlmaster
No. I don't know what you don't understand. "Sands as the Ganges"/"Ganges sands" is just a common Buddhist phrase.

Like "God be with you." or "God's speed" for Christian Countries.

I am not making any other claims.

And I have researched Daoism, a lot actually. In my explanation section I explained common Daoist and Chinese phrases too, I even mention outright the Myriad/Ten Thousand Things, a Daoist concept. I also have in my collection and have read Daoism, a Guide for the Perplexed by Louis Komjathy, The Encyclopedia of Taoism by Fabrizio Pregadio and have 2 translations of The Complete Works of Zhuangzi, one translated by Burton Watson and the other by Brook Ziporyn.

Furthermore, the surface level contradictions between Buddhism and Daoism are completely removed from the fact that the book goes out of its way to say there is "One truth" and that both religions are true, not to mention the countless centuries of Buddhism and Daoism intermingling and Chan Buddhism, Mahayana Buddhism and Flower Garland Buddhism all incorporating the Daoist cosmology, Gods and features into itself.

I don't think it's wise for you to continue the conversation if you don't understand what I'm saying.
Shmooply
Holy fhug Bambu in peak fiction (Deadlock)????????
b4K5sEQ.png
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Never again, MOBAs. Never again.
SuperSonicTL

Hello Lephyr Sir,​

I hope this message finds you well and in good spirits. I kindly request if you could spare a moment to reply here. Your response would truly mean a lot to me, and I would greatly appreciate your kindness. Thank you!
Dark_Soul20189
How do you do references that say something and have a link on it?

For example, the reference itself says Chapter 34, and then it's linked to a manga where you can read it.
Dereck03
Dereck03
Explaining would be hard but just take a look at Anos' old profile and if you want just copy the references and add the links you want to be added instead.
Dark_Soul20189
Dark_Soul20189
Thank you.
Lloydblitzed
Can you comment here?
View previous comments…
Lloydblitzed
Lloydblitzed
Since when was that a rule? Cuz the Discussion Rules states 2 are required at minimum
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
It's common sense. If a staff can accept threads then they can reject threads as well. Disagreements that arises betweens staffs requires more staff approvals, which is established and said on our discussion rules.
Lloydblitzed
Lloydblitzed
Ah okay, I'll keep that in mind for the future then
Back
Top