• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

What's new Featured content New posts New media New media comments New profile posts Latest activity
HI , i just read your post in delete wukong profile. You still use the bad translation. I recommend to use the better translation.
For example, the 72 spell and 32 , 18 spell are base on taoist world: low world are earth, middle world are cloud world, and high world are sky.
Also the transation of Ganges’ sands. What does it even mean. That is a scene when all the deity leave, it just show you how beatifull it is. . And it is normal. Do i need to upload the full page
Next time upload the full page.
That translation also suck.
This is why i told you to upload full page, this is why feat this this exist ( fly to the end heaven , have 72 live, erase his name , ...etc..) .
IF this continue, wukong still have the same problem before
Udlmaster
Udlmaster
I'm not sure which translation you're talking about, if you mean the Wu Cheng translation of JTTW, I don't see why it's a bad translation.

The "Sands of the Ganges" isn't translating the whole page. That wasn't what I was addressing in that paragraph. I was talking about just the one part. The whole page is irrelevant because it's not leading to a larger point about the page, just the brief phrase.

So, I'm baffled by the demand for the whole page, I don't think you properly read it at all, otherwise you'd have know I was talking about how "Sands of the Gages"/"Ganges' sand"/etc. are all referring to a phrase used by Buddhists as a reference for something beyond counting, something infinite or a number so large only the Buddha can truly know.

My response to the thread itself wasn't addressing the points directly. It was laying the whole thing to rest, because I'm going to be dealing with it, the thread is not needed.
Kamenrider0001000
What are you talking about ? Do you read the part understand it.
It talk about all the deity , dragon, phoenix leave the banquet and come to back to the home , each of them have their own home (World) .
It is a poem, i not good at english so i cant think the right word for it but the author use the "Sands of the Gages" to make the poem look big, beautifull.
Shmooply
Holy fhug Bambu in peak fiction (Deadlock)????????
b4K5sEQ.png
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Never again, MOBAs. Never again.
SuperSonicTL

Hello Lephyr Sir,​

I hope this message finds you well and in good spirits. I kindly request if you could spare a moment to reply here. Your response would truly mean a lot to me, and I would greatly appreciate your kindness. Thank you!
Dark_Soul20189
How do you do references that say something and have a link on it?

For example, the reference itself says Chapter 34, and then it's linked to a manga where you can read it.
Dereck03
Dereck03
Explaining would be hard but just take a look at Anos' old profile and if you want just copy the references and add the links you want to be added instead.
Dark_Soul20189
Dark_Soul20189
Thank you.
Renitr
View previous comments…
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
No, the stone cross. Using that method for the destruction of the stone cross snapping yields very high-end 9-C+. However, I'm trying to reach out to Ugarik about whether there's an even better method of approaching it, since this one is imperfect in one aspect.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Then again, who knows. Maybe it does make sense and maybe this is where it fits, even though I earnestly thought it was a 9-B feat. Martial artists and shit cleave rock in half sometimes. Maybe because of the specific method of destruction, this tracks. Either way. The calc is here.
Renitr
Renitr
Considering the hard sh*t that's going on with TWD and it feats right now, I'll be happy to even have a legal high end of 9-C. Anyway, thank you for your work and for the fact that you decided to spend your time on this. I'll try to find this fight scene or backstage photo in behind the scenes, maybe I'll be lucky to find better pictures of cross. But most likely I won't succeed because twd has always had less behind the scenes, and even more so now it's difficult to find behind the scenes for a recent and new project. Still, I think we'll see 9-B twd soon. As the action gets more absurd with each new season, and characters look more and more like superheroes in action movies (Unless, of course, there are not anti-feats)
Astral_Trinity439
Hi, Ultima
Some questions:
Premise: If let's say in a verse, there is a system governing all reality level, non 1-A and 1-A ones included.

Q1: If a being from a lower reality is able to ascend to a higher reality via reincarnation or via transmigration because the system itself intervenes each time to reconstruct the form of said being from non 1-A to the same nature as the 1-A composite in question, is such an ascension valid and not anti feat as a higher power is involved directly?

Q2: If a 1-A being can "enter" a lower reality via manifesting in a body (created by the system or by themselves) that is of the same qualitative nature/composite as the lower reality, such a feat is valid because the characters are not entering the non 1A reality in their true form/1A form, right?
Back
Top