Profile Deletion Requests Thread - 13

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

This is a thread to report profiles and pages, that users come across, that are sorely lacking in justifications, have poor formatting, are almost empty of content, or are otherwise unacceptable by our wiki's standards.

Please report any such profiles to this thread to see if the profiles are liable for deletion, or if they can be revised with help from the staff or regular members.

It should be noted that while regular users can report poorly made profiles, or make a quick note that they are able to help out with fixing a faulty page, only staff members are allowed to discuss whether or not they should be deleted, as othervise this thread would quickly turn unmanageable from the sheer number of responses.

However, if you would like to contribute to the conversation, please leave a message on a staff member's wall.

Note: It is highly recommended that all staff members subscribe to this thread, by clicking the "follow" button in the upper right corner of this post.

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

Continued from here: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3438529

Jackythejack · Nov 3, 2019

So this Huniepop discussion is still happening?

GojiBoyForever · Nov 3, 2019

I suppose it can becomd relevant once more since the rules have been revised.

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

We already revised the rules, but we should probably delete those profiles, yes.

Moritzva · Nov 3, 2019

Antvasima said:
We already revised the rules, but we should probably delete those profiles, yes.

Would a short discussion regarding it's validity be fair? I know some people do firmly believe it's a far lesser evil than, say, CoC.

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

The issue is that our rules are what they are, and we have had a massive amount of discussion leading to them.

Cropfist · Nov 3, 2019

Yeah Huniepop is too sexual to be here.

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

Can somebody list all of the Hunniepop pages that we need to remove?

The_Impress · Nov 3, 2019

Legitimately, the only difference I see between Champions of Corruption and Huniepop is that Huniepop features far more explicit images and the entire plot being solely about sex, while Corruption of Champions is more fetish oriented.

I can make a thread regarding the topic if there were concerns of massive discussions, but honestly it is a pretty clear cut case.

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

Yes, if you or somebody else links to all of the Hunniepop prpfiles, we can delete them.

The other profiles that link to versus threads with the Hunniepop characters also need to be updated though.

The_Impress · Nov 3, 2019

@Antvasima, here's the list of pages to my knowledge

Huniepop

Kyu Sugardust

Celeste Luvendass

Venus

I may take a minute or two to remove matches from the profiles

Jackythejack · Nov 3, 2019

Can i like.

Save the damn source code before you do this

Mindovin · Nov 3, 2019

I deleted all pages and the category about Huniepop.

Jackythejack · Nov 3, 2019

Evidently not

The_Impress · Nov 3, 2019

I wanted to remove the matches from Celeste and Kyu's record so me having access to their profiles would've been preferable before they were deleted...

Mindovin · Nov 3, 2019

I'm deleting them.

Jackythejack · Nov 3, 2019

Yes. I waned the source code before you did that.

Jackythejack · Nov 3, 2019

At the very least can you recommend a place where I ca put them? Because apparently they're not wanted here unlike MGQ

Jackythejack · Nov 3, 2019

Also I don't really see how CoC is any better.

Mindovin · Nov 3, 2019

All matches removed.

The_Impress · Nov 3, 2019

Jackythejack said:
Also I don't really see how CoC is any better.

Exactly, that's why CoC was invalidated from the wiki

Genericstickman · Nov 3, 2019

You can at least give CoC some credit for having a sfw mode

Jackythejack · Nov 3, 2019

And huniepop has a censored mode.

The_Impress · Nov 3, 2019

It has already been discussed, FANDOM is on a high alert against these days on wikis associated with primarily sex oriented content, so we've decided against them, unless the main focus isn't on sex

Jackythejack · Nov 3, 2019

So is MGQ getting the axe as well

The_Impress · Nov 3, 2019

Idk, many staff members argued that MGQ wasn't focused entirely on sex, I'm suspicious, but eh, it'll probably get ax'd on its own later down the line if if had it coming

Anyhow this is getting derailing so I suggest to avoid discussing further

I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die · Nov 3, 2019

A fella made an exact carbon copy of SCP-001 's page. Only difference is that he made him tier 0

Unoriginal_Memes · Nov 3, 2019

SCP-001 (S. Andrew Swann's Proposal)

It's just a copy of an already existing profile, except the tiers have been changed.

Tony_di_bugalu · Nov 3, 2019

Ehhhh, I think this is something

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/SCP-001_(S._Andrew_Swann's_Proposal)

A new profile created to put that thing into tier 0 when there is one already with it being 1-B

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

I deleted the page.

Here is the member who created it:

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:AConfusedPerso

Jackythejack · Nov 3, 2019

Zark2099 said:
Idk, many staff members argued that MGQ wasn't focused entirely on sex, I'm suspicious, but eh, it'll probably get ax'd on its own later down the line if if had it coming

Anyhow this is getting derailing so I suggest to avoid discussing further

I mean I don't see how discussing profiles that could be deleted is derailing the profile deletion but you do you bud.

The_Impress · Nov 3, 2019

@Jacky

Probably because it would fill the entire thread if we're gonna be discussing the possibility of deleting MGQ. Then this won't be profile deletion, it'll be MGQ deletion thread. That topic is so heated it'll require a staff only thread lol

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

Yes. Feel free to start such a staff thread yourself, but make sure to mention both our current rules and that Fandom has started to weed out hentai wikis.

The_Impress · Nov 3, 2019

I'm not knowledgeable in the slightest of the verse, so it's preferable if someone else were to make it

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

Well, neither am I, but you do not need to be in order to just make a brief mention about both our rules and those of Fandom as a whole.

Moritzva · Nov 3, 2019

There honestly could at least of been more than 4 damn posts of discussion before deleting an entire verse.

A verse that has it's own wiki, mind you, that FANDOM is very aware of.

I find this very unprofessional as a whole. Especially if we're not even deleting MGQ because "Oh, that would take too long as a discussion."

These are some ******* tremendous double standards.

Cropfist · Nov 3, 2019

Keeping it here any longer would be the real double standards.

Antvasima · Nov 3, 2019

Cropfist is correct. Anyway, let's drop this topic here please.

Jasonsith · Nov 4, 2019

Antvasima said:
Yes. Feel free to start such a staff thread yourself, but make sure to mention both our current rules and that Fandom has started to weed out hentai wikis.

Thank you for pointing out the final boss behind the drama.

So where we are discussing the retention/deletion of potentially "hentai" and "inapprorpiate" stuffs should this thread be not? Please provide a link. I mean, we actually have a lot of the verses which have blood, gore and sex. The true question is whether they will be deleted as well.

Profile Deletion Requests Thread - 13

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

The Blood Goddess

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

Maintenance worker

The Blood Goddess

Maintenance worker

Similar threads