- 345
- 11
something that has been bothering me for a while now regarding Ishtar's NP and its implied speed. someone took a part out
you guys have this
"Based on that anecdote, she replicates her feat which the Gods feared. First she actives Maanna's warp function to transport herself to the Venus in the outer space during the Age of Gods, where she takes possession of its concept through the management rights, and creates a copy of the conceptual planet which she loads and fires from Maanna's magazine as a bullet with extremely high firepower. After firing the bullet towards Earth's surface, Ishtar utilizes displacement magecraft to warp it into the modern era's airspace. Upon impact, it's able to destroy the mountain range that was a nuisance to the Earth and Venus."
is it supposed to be this:
"While in the middle of her Noble Phantasm, she warps to Venus; however, this is not the Venus in the outer space of the modern era's, but rather, the Venus in the outer space during the time of the age of mythology. Afterwards, grabbing (the concept of) Venus and loading it onto her bow as a bullet, the Venus Blaster shoots this Venus that had been turned into a bullet towards the Earth (surface), and from another person's perspective, it casually warps into the modern era's airspace through the utilization of displacement magic. The mountain range that was a nuisance to others, even to the Earth and to Venus, is accordingly destroyed by this Venus."
the animation itself doesnt show the shot going through a portal or anything of the sort like Ishtar does, so it doesnt showcase spatial shifting, just temporal shifting.
and "from another person's perspective" isnt the same as "it does this". that is to say, it seems more to indicate that someone else that is seeing it will think that spatial displacement happened, not that it did, which could be attributed to just how fast the shot is.
TLDR: i think we should make Ishtar's shot MFTL again because not only does the animaton not showcase spatial shifting, the narration that led to the downgrade is filled with language that inserts the personal biases and observational limitations of a random observer
you guys have this
"Based on that anecdote, she replicates her feat which the Gods feared. First she actives Maanna's warp function to transport herself to the Venus in the outer space during the Age of Gods, where she takes possession of its concept through the management rights, and creates a copy of the conceptual planet which she loads and fires from Maanna's magazine as a bullet with extremely high firepower. After firing the bullet towards Earth's surface, Ishtar utilizes displacement magecraft to warp it into the modern era's airspace. Upon impact, it's able to destroy the mountain range that was a nuisance to the Earth and Venus."
is it supposed to be this:
"While in the middle of her Noble Phantasm, she warps to Venus; however, this is not the Venus in the outer space of the modern era's, but rather, the Venus in the outer space during the time of the age of mythology. Afterwards, grabbing (the concept of) Venus and loading it onto her bow as a bullet, the Venus Blaster shoots this Venus that had been turned into a bullet towards the Earth (surface), and from another person's perspective, it casually warps into the modern era's airspace through the utilization of displacement magic. The mountain range that was a nuisance to others, even to the Earth and to Venus, is accordingly destroyed by this Venus."
the animation itself doesnt show the shot going through a portal or anything of the sort like Ishtar does, so it doesnt showcase spatial shifting, just temporal shifting.
and "from another person's perspective" isnt the same as "it does this". that is to say, it seems more to indicate that someone else that is seeing it will think that spatial displacement happened, not that it did, which could be attributed to just how fast the shot is.
TLDR: i think we should make Ishtar's shot MFTL again because not only does the animaton not showcase spatial shifting, the narration that led to the downgrade is filled with language that inserts the personal biases and observational limitations of a random observer
