• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I agree there's been something off with the AP of this verse for the longest time. And why does it say stuff about an asteroid feat but links to a calc of a totally different feat?
 
Actually, you can use Rel KE as long as it's under 96%

This isn't, so I guess we'll have to look into other stuff
 
DMUA said:
Actually, you can use Rel KE as long as it's under 96%
We can't use KE at all above that speed? I thought you just had to start multiplying by 4 and it was good to use.

"For kinetic energy values above that, which are not faster than light, 4 times the kinetic energy value should be taken"
 
Where did that come from? About multiplying '''FTL''' objects by 4? I don't remember anything like that and it would lead to a lot of stuff if we did that.
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
Where did that come from? About multiplying FTL objects by 4? I don't remember anything like that and it would lead to a lot of stuff if we did that.
No no, I know FTL is totally unusable in KE. The multiplying by 4 is the lorenz (I think it's lorenz) factor between Relativistic and Newtonian. It's used above 93% and under SoL. That's what the current page indicates at least.
 
New feats should be fine, as well as a recalc of the said feat above (which I will put on the Calc Request thread) . What notable AP feats were there?
 
So I made a calc here which is probably going to be he new AP of the Powerpuff Girls, considering that the Solar Flare feat is an outlier.
 
k i think its worth pointing out that even though revisions were made, this thread neglected that the original calc is simply incorrect. they used the speed of light for solar flares (solar flares as a whole are not lightspeed, radiation from the mass is) which is not correct. solar mass ejections according to NASA range from 12 to 1250 miles per second which, using the highest end and the same mass, is only 13 or so petatons.


also I am pretty sure there is consistent planet busting stuff, one of which used to be on the profile anyway (hearsay though, not necessarily my business). the feat got rejected for being an outlier when it should have just been deemed incorrect.
 
Im sure the original calcer even admitted it to not be accepted, and removed it. Then, it just got added back by someone else.
 
Back
Top