• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Lion vs Composite Human

Status
Not open for further replies.
Uradelbauer

Uradelbauer

634
284
The human gets a katana and a machete along with a glock. This is a male Lion. Standard battle assumptions but start 10 meters away from eachother.

Who wins?

CH: 22

Lion: 0
 
Incase people bring it up; the story about the man killing the lion was that he actually had weapons and that the Lion was likely old/sick.
 
Ignoring the fact that this is the world's greatest Marksman and the worlds best hunter so giving him a Glock makes this a stomp,

I'm pretty sure no matter what you give CH, it's a stomp.

Hand to Hand is fairer, but I still think CH pulls off a win due to better speed and skills/Intellgience. Possibly an AP advantage but eh.
 
"Along with a glock" you don't even need the composite human; I could kill a lion if you gave me a pistol. (Seriously remove the pistol it makes this a stomp in the humans favor since even children could kill a lion if you gave them a gun they could operate).
 
Keeweed said:
"Along with a glock" you don't even need the composite human; I could kill a lion if you gave me a pistol. (Seriously remove the pistol it makes this a stomp in the humans favor since even children could kill a lion if you gave them a gun they could operate).
Click to expand...
You're underestimating Lions, they can tank bullets for a while. And I doubt you or the children have good enough aim to hit vital spots.
 
^ I meant a child that can some what use a gun (like one that got a 22 for their birthday or something); also while I think it possibly could survive a shot it differently isn't going to survive an entire clip anytime soon.
 
Megaquake2012 said:
Ignoring the fact that this is the world's greatest Marksman and the worlds best hunter so giving him a Glock makes this a stomp,
I'm pretty sure no matter what you give CH, it's a stomp.

Hand to Hand is fairer, but I still think CH pulls off a win due to better speed and skills/Intellgience. Possibly an AP advantage but eh.
Click to expand...
CH isn't that strong. The Lion can literally cross the distance I gave in under half a second with its speed. CH's combat speed is 44mph while the Lion's overall speed is 50mph.

I gave him the Glock because I thought the Lion was going to stomp.

CH is a lot slower though. And how does he have an AP advantage? A Lion killed an adult woman with one paw swipe
 
Keeweed said:
"Along with a glock" you don't even need the composite human; I could kill a lion if you gave me a pistol. (Seriously remove the pistol it makes this a stomp in the humans favor since even children could kill a lion if you gave them a gun they could operate).
Click to expand...
I doubt it. The Lion would cross the distance and tear your throat out before you would aim correctly. And one shot to the stomach isn't going to kill a big animal like that
 
CCFB said:
Keeweed said:
"Along with a glock" you don't even need the composite human; I could kill a lion if you gave me a pistol. (Seriously remove the pistol it makes this a stomp in the humans favor since even children could kill a lion if you gave them a gun they could operate).
Click to expand...
I doubt it. The Lion would cross the distance and tear your throat out before you would aim correctly. And one shot to the stomach isn't going to kill a big animal like that
Click to expand...
Composite Human can draw the Glock and fire in 200 Miliseconds with good aim, you're forgetting that this is the world's greatest Marksman? AND with a Katana he can slice and react at 55 MPH. 5 MPH faster than the lion.

Second, the lion one-shotting an adult woman isn't that impressive, since CH could do the same. A lady using Hysterical Strength was able to tangle with a Polar Bear for a while, taking hits and fighting back aswell. I see no reason as to why CH can't do the same except even better since he is way more skilled and powerful in Base than an average Human is. Not to mention Hysterical Strength also increases our running speed to 40 MPH and our Combat/Reactions to an Unknown degree. Likely far faster though.

To put it bluntly, CH should be able to not only keep up with the Lion, but he might be able to blitz it. If we ignore the hypotheical Hysterical Strength boost, then we still have a slight speed advantage.

SoI think CH pulls off a win no matter what.
 
Lion is stronger and faster but that gun tho. The human shoots the lion which weakens it allowing the human to kill the lion with it's katana and machete. The human walks out of the fight wearing a fur coat and eating a lion burger.
 
Megaquake2012 said:
Composite Human can draw the Glock and fire in 200 Miliseconds with good aim, you're forgetting that this is the world's greatest Marksman? AND with a Katana he can slice and react at 55 MPH. 5 MPH faster than the lion.

Second, the lion one-shotting an adult woman isn't that impressive, since CH could do the same. A lady using Hysterical Strength was able to tangle with a Polar Bear for a while, taking hits and fighting back aswell. I see no reason as to why CH can't do the same except even better since he is way more skilled and powerful in Base than an average Human is. Not to mention Hysterical Strength also increases our running speed to 40 MPH and our Combat/Reactions to an Unknown degree. Likely far faster though.

To put it bluntly, CH should be able to not only keep up with the Lion, but he might be able to blitz it. If we ignore the hypotheical Hysterical Strength boost, then we still have a slight speed advantage.

SoI think CH pulls off a win no matter what.
Click to expand...
And the Lion can cross the distance in 400 miliseconds. One glock pistol shot isn't going to kill the cat. One katana swing isn't going to either. It might even break on the Lion's skull.

When has someone one-shot another person with a punch without counting collateral damage (e.g. them falling and busting their head on concrete? Also, link? There are multiple counts of Polar Bears effortlessly mauling groups of humans and guard dogs. Knowing how these stories go, chances are it wasn't a big one and she just scared it off. They can't do with the Lion, not only because it likely didn't happen, but also because a Lion is leagues faster than a Polar Bear and much more agile. And Felines have incredible reactions, house cats can reach much faster than even athletic humans for an example. Lion still holds a decent speed advantage.

How is he going to blitz it when it can run nearly 25mph faster? I can only see CH winning if he aims for the mouth or eyes, which knowing how aggressive and fast Lions are is gonna be very difficult.

I can see the Lion crossing the distance and just mauling the CH before they can pull their gun. With that it's just a matter of time before the Lion rips their throat out with its superior physical stats.
 
CCFB said:
Megaquake2012 said:
Composite Human can draw the Glock and fire in 200 Miliseconds with good aim, you're forgetting that this is the world's greatest Marksman? AND with a Katana he can slice and react at 55 MPH. 5 MPH faster than the lion.

Second, the lion one-shotting an adult woman isn't that impressive, since CH could do the same. A lady using Hysterical Strength was able to tangle with a Polar Bear for a while, taking hits and fighting back aswell. I see no reason as to why CH can't do the same except even better since he is way more skilled and powerful in Base than an average Human is. Not to mention Hysterical Strength also increases our running speed to 40 MPH and our Combat/Reactions to an Unknown degree. Likely far faster though.

To put it bluntly, CH should be able to not only keep up with the Lion, but he might be able to blitz it. If we ignore the hypotheical Hysterical Strength boost, then we still have a slight speed advantage.

SoI think CH pulls off a win no matter what.
Click to expand...
And the Lion can cross the distance in 400 miliseconds. One glock pistol shot isn't going to kill the cat. One katana swing isn't going to either. It might even break on the Lion's skull.
When has someone one-shot another person with a punch without counting collateral damage (e.g. them falling and busting their head on concrete? Also, link? There are multiple counts of Polar Bears effortlessly mauling groups of humans and guard dogs. Knowing how these stories go, chances are it wasn't a big one and she just scared it off. They can't do with the Lion, not only because it likely didn't happen, but also because a Lion is leagues faster than a Polar Bear and much more agile. And Felines have incredible reactions, house cats can reach much faster than even athletic humans for an example. Lion still holds a decent speed advantage.

How is he going to blitz it when it can run nearly 25mph faster? I can only see CH winning if he aims for the mouth or eyes, which knowing how aggressive and fast Lions are is gonna be very difficult.

I can see the Lion crossing the distance and just mauling the CH before they can pull their gun. With that it's just a matter of time before the Lion rips their throat out with its superior physical stats.
Click to expand...
Oof where do I start....400 Miliseconds is enough for two Glock shots. Possibly to the head, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/new...other-wrestles-lost-polar-bear/article703773/ here's the most detailed account of the Polar Bear vs lady story I could find, she was officially recognized by the Canadian government too.

As for blitzing, I already pointed out that CH has a considerable speed advantage with the katana, since he is 55 MPH against a 50 MPH Lion. As for running speed, I already pointed out that CH using Hysterical is 40 MPH, only 10 MPH slower, not to mention our stamina means we can run for hundreds of miles without tire.

While I do understand that Lions are pretty damn fast, we're not exactly slowpokes, with Hysterical Strength we could possibly match their speed if not go even faster, ignoring that we still have better reactions(55 MPH), way better skill, etc.

As for a Human one-shotting another Human, I thought that was pretty obvious? Bruce Lee had to constantly hold back because he was afraid of killing people and I'm pretty sure there are more instances which I can get if you want.

Finally, A Katana doesn't need to be aimed at the head, how would the lion defend against it's stomach being sliced up or some other weak spot?
 
Megaquake2012 said:
Oof where do I start....400 Miliseconds is enough for two Glock shots. Possibly to the head, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/new...other-wrestles-lost-polar-bear/article703773/ here's the most detailed account of the Polar Bear vs lady story I could find, she was officially recognized by the Canadian government too.

As for blitzing, I already pointed out that CH has a considerable speed advantage with the katana, since he is 55 MPH against a 50 MPH Lion. As for running speed, I already pointed out that CH using Hysterical is 40 MPH, only 10 MPH slower, not to mention our stamina means we can run for hundreds of miles without tire.

While I do understand that Lions are pretty damn fast, we're not exactly slowpokes, with Hysterical Strength we could possibly match their speed if not go even faster, ignoring that we still have better reactions(55 MPH), way better skill, etc.

As for a Human one-shotting another Human, I thought that was pretty obvious? Bruce Lee had to constantly hold back because he was afraid of killing people and I'm pretty sure there are more instances which I can get if you want.

Finally, A Katana doesn't need to be aimed at the head, how would the lion defend against it's stomach being sliced up or some other weak spot?
Click to expand...
Are you sure CH can move to the gun and aim that quickly? While he's getting a good aim the Lion can just cross the distance and jump on him. And it sounds like she just scared it off. Polar Bears can easily kill humans.

Uh, 5mph is a considerable advantage but 10mph isn't? And where does that come from anyways? The endurance isn't that useful since no one will be running away in this fight.

We are pretty much slowpokes in comparison to big cats dude. I can't see a human physicall running over 50mph. And considering how fast felines are I doubt the Lion doesn't have the reactions to match. Another thing, a lot of CH's skill is against bipedal humanoids, which a Lion isn't.

When has a person instantly killed a person with one kick/punch without counting outside damage? Some people have seriously injured eachother and even bled out and died, yeah, but never instantly one-hit killed.

By 1. Having much tougher skin against cutting than humans or most Primates really and 2. by not having its stomach exposed via being on four legs
 
^ dude we kill lions literally every day of the week; there are African tribes that test their young adults by having them kill lions. We are literally driving lions and everyother animal on the planet into extinction. Why do you think the Lion can survive multiple gun shots and getting impladed to the head?
 
We kill them because we have very strong weaponry and equipment. And those African tribes just go for the tongue and rip it out; many still die anyways. You're talking about the Maasai. We're driving them to extinction only because we have equipment and use nature for our own things.

There's this Homo Erectus fossil site; all of the camp died, children, adults, elderly. Guess who was the culprit of killing all 15 of them? One cave hyena. Literally one 200lb animal. They used to feed on us as a feed source and we didn't kill them off until the dawn of agriculture, 10k years ago. We are no match even for any medium sized predator without gigantic health boosts and training.

Lions can survive a few pistol shots to be body out of sheer size, body structure and durability. Do you mean impaled? Lion skulls are much stronger than human skulls, which katanas even break on. If the guy swings the katana at its head, the katana will just snap in half and leaving a flesh wound, which Lions deal with everyday.
 
^ the lion would still be in severe amount of pain after getting stabbed; also not only did you just agree that Africa tribes have killed lions, but this is the composite human (the guy who can pick up 500 pounds one hand and can lift two cars). The kitana is either going to cripple the lion or the human could stab the lion to the neck causing it bleed out. Or he could just shot it in the eye.
 
CCFB said:
We kill them because we have very strong weaponry and equipment. And those African tribes just go for the tongue and rip it out; many still die anyways. You're talking about the Maasai. We're driving them to extinction only because we have equipment and use nature for our own things.
There's this Homo Erectus fossil site; all of the camp died, children, adults, elderly. Guess who was the culprit of killing all 15 of them? One cave hyena. Literally one 200lb animal. They used to feed on us as a feed source and we didn't kill them off until the dawn of agriculture, 10k years ago. We are no match even for any medium sized predator without gigantic health boosts and training.

Lions can survive a few pistol shots to be body out of sheer size, body structure and durability. Do you mean impaled? Lion skulls are much stronger than human skulls, which katanas even break on. If the guy swings the katana at its head, the katana will just snap in half and leaving a flesh wound, which Lions deal with everyday.
Click to expand...
The katana and machete are designed for killing animals like that. Sure the lion is faster and stronger but the thing is, we are at the top of the food chain for a reason, the highest causes of human deaths anually are things that we created, we are killing ourselves more than other animals. Anyway the human needs to fire the gun at the lion's head which would either kill it or injure it, allowing the human to finish it with it's katana or machete. The CH knows the weak points, so he can slash open the jugular vein of the lion causing it to bleed out. Or hit it in the back of it's neck with the machete which could sever the spinal cord and paralyze it which would buy the latter enough time to finish it off. The CH can hit the lion in weak points that would kill it.
 
Lions have extremely painful things done to them. It won't be anything it couldn't handle. I did, but that's with prep. They probably rip the tongue out of the Lion then run away. This isn't even saying the ones that get killed by the Lions. And the CH is still much weaker than the Lion; humans just are built for lifting. The katana is not going to cripple the Lion, just enrage it. A 50mph 400lb animal isn't going to just stand there. Its claws could also disembowel CH. Do you really think they can survive that?
 
^ no I don't think the human would survive the lions attack, but neither would the lion, and since the composite human has the experience and versatility advantage plus a gun and multiple swords he could just shot the lion in the head or stab it in the jugular.

  • Edit the composite human also has the lifting strength advantage, so what's stopping him from throwing the lion off him and stabbing it in the stomach when it's on the ground. (And he can swing a baseball bat at 100 mph)
 
Hyper Anon said:
The katana and machete are designed for killing animals like that. Sure the lion is faster and stronger but the thing is, we are at the top of the food chain for a reason, the highest causes of human deaths anually are things that we created, we are killing ourselves more than other animals. Anyway the human needs to fire the gun at the lion's head which would either kill it or injure it, allowing the human to finish it with it's katana or machete. The CH knows the weak points, so he can slash open the jugular vein of the lion causing it to bleed out. Or hit it in the back of it's neck with the machete which could sever the spinal cord and paralyze it which would buy the latter enough time to finish it off. The CH can hit the lion in weak points that would kill it.
Click to expand...
Katanas actually were meant to kill humans, and machete is a war weapon. We are on the top of the food chain due to weapons not included in this fight. And it's not easy; the Lion is faster and stronger. The Lion could just pounce on them before that and maul them. Humans martial arts are mostly meant for humanoids. And again, the Lion won't just let that happen. The mane also protects the neck from anything like that, so it has another barrier.
 
CCFB said:
Hyper Anon said:
The katana and machete are designed for killing animals like that. Sure the lion is faster and stronger but the thing is, we are at the top of the food chain for a reason, the highest causes of human deaths anually are things that we created, we are killing ourselves more than other animals. Anyway the human needs to fire the gun at the lion's head which would either kill it or injure it, allowing the human to finish it with it's katana or machete. The CH knows the weak points, so he can slash open the jugular vein of the lion causing it to bleed out. Or hit it in the back of it's neck with the machete which could sever the spinal cord and paralyze it which would buy the latter enough time to finish it off. The CH can hit the lion in weak points that would kill it.
Click to expand...
Katanas actually were meant to kill humans, and machete is a war weapon. We are on the top of the food chain due to weapons not included in this fight. And it's not easy; the Lion is faster and stronger. The Lion could just pounce on them before that and maul them. Humans martial arts are mostly meant for humanoids. And again, the Lion won't just let that happen. The mane also protects the neck from anything like that, so it has another barrier.
Click to expand...
The katana is also used to kill wall level animals same with machetes. AThey aren't wall level but they can bleed wall level animals to death. Also we are at the top of the food chain for 100K years by using more primitive weapons. The lion is stronger and faster, I didn't say it wasn't. The human is screwed if he tries to beat up the lion but it can delay his death for a while. And lion's mane protects their jugular vein from other lion's bites, it had the mane thousands of years before the katana and machete where developed let alone the glock, lions have rather weak bites, they kill their prey by suffocating them to death and if they wanted to break the neck of their prey, they bite the neck and shook their heads around, snapping the neck. And the human can just jump on the lion at the right time and shoot it in the back of it's head.
 
Hyper Anon said:
The katana is also used to kill wall level animals same with machetes. AThey aren't wall level but they can bleed wall level animals to death. Also we are at the top of the food chain for 100K years by using more primitive weapons. The lion is stronger and faster, I didn't say it wasn't. The human is screwed if he tries to beat up the lion but it can delay his death for a while. And lion's mane protects their jugular vein from other lion's bites, it had the mane thousands of years before the katana and machete where developed let alone the glock, lions have rather weak bites, they kill their prey by suffocating them to death and if they wanted to break the neck of their prey, they bite the neck and shook their heads around, snapping the neck. And the human can just jump on the lion at the right time and shoot it in the back of it's head.
Click to expand...
When have they been used to kill wall level animals? Japan doesn't have any wall level animals. The most they had is a small wolf and that's dead. It's only been used on humans. The machete is way more powerful but animals can survive it. And no, we haven't been on the top of the food chain for 100k years. I would say like 10k at most; the beginning of agriculture. Before that animals held no fear of us and regularly used us as a food source. I don't think you understand how fast and aggressive a Lion is dude. If he tries to fight the Lion, it will just maul him with claws and teeth. And the Lion's mane would protect it from slices or stabs, as it has done before. No one has slit a male Lion's throat. And Lions do not have weak bites by any sense of the word. It's over 1,000 PSI. They can easily break an animal's neck by biting/ Again, you're assuming the Lion will just let that happen, which it won't/
 
CCFB said:
Hyper Anon said:
The katana is also used to kill wall level animals same with machetes. AThey aren't wall level but they can bleed wall level animals to death. Also we are at the top of the food chain for 100K years by using more primitive weapons. The lion is stronger and faster, I didn't say it wasn't. The human is screwed if he tries to beat up the lion but it can delay his death for a while. And lion's mane protects their jugular vein from other lion's bites, it had the mane thousands of years before the katana and machete where developed let alone the glock, lions have rather weak bites, they kill their prey by suffocating them to death and if they wanted to break the neck of their prey, they bite the neck and shook their heads around, snapping the neck. And the human can just jump on the lion at the right time and shoot it in the back of it's head.
Click to expand...
When have they been used to kill wall level animals? Japan doesn't have any wall level animals. The most they had is a small wolf and that's dead. It's only been used on humans. The machete is way more powerful but animals can survive it. And no, we haven't been on the top of the food chain for 100k years. I would say like 10k at most; the beginning of agriculture. Before that animals held no fear of us and regularly used us as a food source. I don't think you understand how fast and aggressive a Lion is dude. If he tries to fight the Lion, it will just maul him with claws and teeth. And the Lion's mane would protect it from slices or stabs, as it has done before. No one has slit a male Lion's throat. And Lions do not have weak bites by any sense of the word. It's over 1,000 PSI. They can easily break an animal's neck by biting/ Again, you're assuming the Lion will just let that happen, which it won't/
Click to expand...
Even 10K years ago we still were using primitve weapons. The human does need to fight the lion up close he can easily fight it with the glock. No one has slit a lion's throat because there aren't many composite humans in the world. I thought lions had 400 psi bites. The human can just shoot the lion in the leg and if the lion tried mauling the human, the human would slice open the latter's stomach.
 
Hyper Anon said:
Even 10K years ago we still were using primitve weapons. The human does need to fight the lion up close he can easily fight it with the glock. No one has slit a lion's throat because there aren't many composite humans in the world. I thought lions had 400 psi bites. The human can just shoot the lion in the leg and if the lion tried mauling the human, the human would slice open the latter's stomach.
Click to expand...
It depends on what you mean by primitive. We were may more advanced 10k years ago than we were even 20k years ago. And again, the Lion's vitals aren't in aim naturally via it being on four legs. And I don't think CH can slit the Lion's throat when it has massive protection there. Lion's have bite forces over 1000 PSI. Again, Lions have been shot in legs before (it only gets them more enraged) and it's more likely that the Lion would slice open the humans stomach before that. A katana can't just slice through Lion hide and flesh like butter at all. A couple of paw swipes from the Lion and the human is in an extremely bad position, possibly mortally wounded
 
Dude this the composite human; he has bones far denser than an average humans and he can pick up two cars; the machete to the neck is going to cripple or kill the lion, and theirs nothing stopping the human from picking the lion up and throwing it onto the ground since it has class 5 lifting strength compared to the lions class 1 (yes the lion hits harder but it pounce isn't going to work due to the human being able to lift it off of him, and the human could hold the lion down or toss it into areas that allow the human to stab it)
 
Can the composite man make some primitive trap with his machete? Like, he sharpens the wooden spikes then dig a hole, camouflages it and lures the lion into it? Pretty sure that was how cavemen did back then in antiquity.

So if this is allowed, I vote for composite human
 
Keeweed said:
Dude this the composite human; he has bones far denser than an average humans and he can pick up two cars; the machete to the neck is going to cripple or kill the lion, and theirs nothing stopping the human from picking the lion up and throwing it onto the ground since it has class 5 lifting strength compared to the lions class 1 (yes the lion hits harder but it pounce isn't going to work due to the human being able to lift it off of him, and the human could hold the lion down or toss it into areas that allow the human to stab it)
Click to expand...
And the Lion is still above that. Lifting does not equal to fights. Do you know how weak human skin is in comparison to even a house cats? The Lion could eviscerate them in one swipe. And no, a machete blow isn't going to break a massive Lion's muscular neck in any way. Do you think the mane is entirely for show? There's many things stopping the human from doing that; including but not limited to: speed of the lion, strength of the lion, aggression of the lion, durability of the lion. The pounce is going to work before the Lion willl immediately be going for the throat. Hold it down and expect it to not maul him in the process?
 
SoulOfCinder123 said:
Well, voting for the composite human. His strength stomps
Click to expand...
It doesnt; the strongest punch ever is like more than 10-15x weaker than what even Lionesses give off and take regularly. There is no physical comparison with the two, really.

SoulOfCinder123 said:
Can the composite man make some primitive trap with his machete? Like, he sharpens the wooden spikes then dig a hole, camouflages it and lures the lion into it? Pretty sure that was how cavemen did back then in antiquity.

So if this is allowed, I vote for composite human
Click to expand...
The Lion would kill them if they set their eyes off of it. Also, Lions viewed cavemen as prey more than vice versa.
 
CCFB said:
And the Lion is still above that. Lifting does not equal to fights. Do you know how weak human skin is in comparison to even a house cats? The Lion could eviscerate them in one swipe. And no, a machete blow isn't going to break a massive Lion's muscular neck in any way. Do you think the mane is entirely for show? There's many things stopping the human from doing that; including but not limited to: speed of the lion, strength of the lion, aggression of the lion, durability of the lion. The pounce is going to work before the Lion willl immediately be going for the throat. Hold it down and expect it to not maul him in the process?
Click to expand...
If the lions goes for the throat that just goes against since it would expose it's neck and stomach to the CH. also the CH can swing a baseball bat at 100 mph meaning that the machete is going into the lion neck or skull at one hundred miles per hour. And the speed difference for both are nothing; neither are two times faster or slower. The lions 5% faster movement speed and is most likely slower with attack and reaction speed (but maybe the lions page is just very vague). Lifting strength does matter in fights like this because you cannot overpower or pounce on something when it can pick up 5000 pounds compared to the lions 500-1000 pounds. The human can support the lions weight with one hand; and could just shot it if he somehow couldn't overpower it (despite being the smartest and most experienced human on the planet, and regular humans already kill lions for sport).
 
Keeweed said:
If the lions goes for the throat that just goes against since it would expose it's neck and stomach to the CH. also the CH can swing a baseball bat at 100 mph meaning that the machete is going into the lion neck or skull at one hundred miles per hour. And the speed difference for both are nothing; neither are two times faster or slower. The lions 5% faster movement speed and is most likely slower with attack and reaction speed (but maybe the lions page is just very vague). Lifting strength does matter in fights like this because you cannot overpower or pounce on something when it can pick up 5000 pounds compared to the lions 500-1000 pounds. The human can support the lions weight with one hand; and could just shot it if he somehow couldn't overpower it (despite being the smartest and most experienced human on the planet, and regular humans already kill lions for sport).
Click to expand...
What? No, it wouldn't; its stomach is out of reach and its neck is protected by the mane, see Asiatic Lions. And that does not translate to combat speed at all, their combat speed is just around 45mph. The Lion won't just let the machete hit it. And the speed difference matters due to how the Lion is faster all-around while the human can only roughly match it in combat speed. Felines have extremely fast reactions so I doubt the Lion is any slower. And not really because the Lion is stronger in every other way. Lifting strength won't protect you from 5 paw swipes in 2 seconds.

You keep on thinking that the Lion is slow and unresponsive by what I see; but they are extremely aggressive and fast animals. Before the human has any chance to do their tricks it can easily maul them. And again, regular humans do not kill Lions for sport with anything close to this scenario. American trophy hunters sit in a armored jeep with a high powered rifle and shoot them, then just wait for them to die. The Maasai killing Lions takes outside help and some preparation.
 
^ stronger in every way; If you ingore the lifting strength advantage, experience advantage, intelligent advantage, versatility and weapon advantage, then sure the lions stronger (its not like in nature lifting strength would be helpful in anyway; I mean being able to pick up your opponent in one hand, definitely isn't helpful in anyway).
 
Keeweed said:
^ stronger in every way; If you ingore the lifting strength advantage, experience advantage, intelligent advantage, versatility and weapon advantage, then sure the lions stronger (its not like in nature lifting strength would be helpful in anyway; I mean being able to pick up your opponent in one hand, definitely isn't helpful in anyway).
Click to expand...
I can say something like that as well. The human is stronger in every way apart from strength in where it actually matters by a mile, durability by a mile, speed, pain tolerance by a mile and stamina by a mile. Also, the Lion has enough strength to toss around the human as well. Again, humans are just built for lifting. It makes no difference.

RavenSupreme said:
composite human should absolutely stomp, especially with the weapons at his disposal
Click to expand...
Explain how? I gave them the Glock because of how it was unfair with a machete and katana. They are not instantenous death weapons, especially to a massive big cat
 
I can say something like that as well. The human is stronger in every way apart from strength in where it actually matters, durability, speed, pain tolerance and stamina. Also, the Lion has enough strength to toss around the human as well. Again, humans are just built for lifting. It makes no difference.

RavenSupreme said:
composite human should absolutely stomp, especially with the weapons at his disposal
Click to expand...
Explain how? I gave them the Glock because of how it was unfair with a machete and katana

STAMINA Humans are almost 100% stamina based; our stamina is off of almost every other animals chart; I (an slightly over weight person) was able to run all the way up a small mountain without stopping; the human differently has better stamina and the speed difference is almost non existent no matter who has the speed advantage. Also once again he has a gun and a metal sword.
 
Keeweed said:
STAMINA Humans are almost 100% stamina based; our stamina is off of almost every other animals chart; I (an slightly over weight person) was able to run all the way up a small mountain without stopping; the human differently has better stamina and the speed difference is almost non existent no matter who has the speed advantage. Also once again he has a gun and a metal sword.
Click to expand...
Running stamina is not the same as being able to fight for a long time with massive injuries at all. No one will be running away in this fight; it's not comparable. The Lion has better stamina/endurance and 6-7mph is a decent advantage in combat speed. Katanas break fairly easily (especially would on a Lion) and a Lion won't die to a single gun shot. A machete is stronger but it still doesn't have enough force to one-shot a Lion. Also, them holding the sword puts their hands vulnerable to a paw swipe, which would break them
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

the ultimate question:
Replies
4
Views
549
Samael_010
Samael_010
ThePrimalHunter
Composite Human Can't Release (Composite Human vs Look-See) (0-0-0)
Replies
3
Views
700
ThePrimalHunter
ThePrimalHunter
StrymULTRA
Tiger vs Lion: This debate is wack
2 3
Replies
86
Views
10K
Lou_change
Lou_change
DaReaperMan
Senator Armstrong finds himself an Orc (Armstrong vs Grom)
2
Replies
53
Views
1K
XSOULOFCINDERX
XSOULOFCINDERX
Oiguana2701
Prehistoric boar vs current boar
Replies
3
Views
473
SamanPatou
SamanPatou
Back
Top