I also agree with Aguila.
Besides, IMHO being able to enter or leave a void doesn't seem like you're resisting time/space, or at least, not the manipulation of either or both of them.
I'm not entirely sure about what our Wiki's stance on this -I'd like to think we have a page officially detailing it- but, this is how I'd view it:
You're existing in a void. IMHO, the absence of time is a confusing thing, as it is a "human concept", or, personally attempting to describe what time generally encompasses: The rate at which events occur. Ex: "The clock just now changed to a new hour.", "1 second later, second hand moved 1 notch.", "Years into the future, the world was destroyed."
Things happen within time, whether you travel forwards, backwards, or make a new timeline & travel out the "side" of the time stream. I'm not sure if what I'm saying is or isn't in line with our wiki's stance -if there is an established one- but I'd like to think it makes sense.
If time is treated as something innate to existence, the absence of time seems like, to me.... The absence of any sequence to events which occur, which arguably, includes processes necessary for the function of the universe. Atoms wouldn't move, because the sequence of events that includes them coming to exist & beginning to move never happened. Even if they did exist, they wouldn't be moving, because events cannot progress without "time", if it's something innate to exist.
But this seems redundant without space, because with no space, which presumably, is a part of everything that exists within a... setting, there isn't anything.
With no space, there aren't galaxies, or things containing galaxies, nor stars, nor planets, nor comets, nor the things that make up those, & so on & so forth. As I see it, if a reality exists without space, it arguably doesn't exist at all. At best, it's empty & has borders.
But if it has borders, like a giant empty bubble, then why is this a location that can be gone to, when one travels from another reality? And if it has borders, then aren't those arguably part of this reality? Or outside of the spaceless, timeless existence, do they exist & remain in an unprogressing state? But then, what composes them, if they somehow border a lack of anything whatsoever & themselves, aren't part of another reality?
If something is truly empty, without even space to define its contents, should there even be any distances to travel, in any direction? I suppose, even in real life, there is, supposedly, actually empty space.
I'd say, arguably, if one is thus, able to act inside of a void, it would seem like they are simply able to support themselves. There isn't anything, but them even being there moving assumes there's enough... room to contain them, & enough room to move.
Do the laws of physics apply in a place with no sources of gravity, movement, energy/heat, & so on & so forth?
If you move inside a void, it would seem like you are facilitating the functioning of yourself in a reality without such things. You are able to make the atoms that compose you move, &/or make them keep moving.
But if there isn't time, then the events you cause, in order to move your atoms do not have a sequence to progress, & presumably, would not occur.
But if there is no time to define the sequence of what occurs, then shouldn't that mean that nothing defines their sequence except what is able? Therefore, if you can move your atoms, nothing stops you from doing so, & hence, an absence of time is irrelevant to you.
Or is time something innate to things from realities that have time that carries over with them into a void?
Thus, a question comes up: If a void is the absence of space & time, where, presumably, the laws of physics do not apply or occur, because they do not exist, then isn't being there & acting at all different from a resistance to manipulation of them?
You are facilitating yourself & things you can do by being inside of & acting within a void.
Of course, this presumes that you facilitate the functioning of things you brought in with you, which didn't exist before in a void. Like a rock. Or your clothes. Or your weapons. Or your ship.
However, it's not like there are any laws of physics, in a void, right? No gravity, no entropy, no heat, nor energy.
You might freeze to death &/or suffocate from a lack of air, among other horrible events. Maybe your molecules might cease to be bonded. But other than that, what's literally STOPPING your function? There isn't any matter, I don't know if there's laws of physics, & does an absence of a sequence for events to occur in prevent them from being performed?
If you're in a void, that just seems like you can function without the need for physics holding you together, so that you can act, creating a sequence of order for events.
In the absence of space & time, there is no space & time to manipulate, nor being manipulated. So should being able to act in a void really mean you resist the manipulation of them?
Heck, arguably it could just be chalked up to writers ignoring physics, especially ones that may not be well understood -not to say I'm a physics expert.- or maybe just not properly understanding physics to begin with.
Sorry for all the words. On the topic of Mewtwo, how many times HAS it moved in a void?