• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because 682 has shown to be able to adapt to less dimensional space than 2-D, meaning he'd be able to adapt to 2-D as adapting to 0-D space > Adapting to 2-D space feat-wise

The fact that he's also adapted to Higher dimensional space supports this
 
Technically its lowkey hinted to that the Scarlet King and the Crimson King are the same entity in SCP
 
Wait, the Scarlet King and The Crimson King are the same entity? Where did you get this information, and where can I find it?
 
Yes. Regardless. It's a stomp in 682's favour anyway.
 
You really think it's a stomp? There was a lot of debate here.
 
Yukari can't kill it thanks to 343.

She can't BFR it, thanks to 343 and it's own consciousness.

She can't seal it, because 343.

She can't do anything to 682.
 
And 682 has ways to deal with her like Mind Manip and Power Absorbstion.

Also other things that make it so she cant do anything to 682 are its large list of resistences and reactive evo.
 
You're right.

Stomp in 682's favor.
 
SCP 682 definitely can't loose, but that doesn'tmean he can win. Yukari's hax won't let her loose either. It's inconclusive, but when we're talking about SCP-682's true form then it's a clear victory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top