LoudestProcedure
Any/All- 292
- 125
Argus
Xiao
Both are at 7-A
Speed not equalize
Location is the Amazon rain forest
Points
Edgy adeptus: @Mickey1940 @Puppet43 @SuperNunnas
Edgy fallen angel: @Harry_Ackerman_6969
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
for Xiao's AP, he's unquantifiably stronger than Shenhe and that's kinda all we got going for him. All we know is that he'd stomp Shenhe in-verse but that's not specific enoughYeah the whole “higher than etc etc” just looks a bit too vague so I just thought that it’s just on the same tier just vaguely higher since iirc other verse on this wiki does that too
Xiao is not stomping ShenheAll we know is that he'd stomp Shenhe in-verse but that's not specific enough
I mean this is a problem of the supporters not updating the pages tbh, u can't expect that we take things which are non in profileArgus page is absolutelly outdated. However, using game mechanics here is non-sense and too vague to be used. In MLA's own game mechanics, Argus's immortality time can be upgraded to 8 seconds, showing that this time durition is just to make the game fair, not applies to lores.
Even if it is not in the profile, Argus should scale to Zhask's travel speed due both being said to be very close enemies, and since Zhask is someone who always changes position (He was travelling across planes when fighting with Yve) while Argus is someone who will never stop untill he kills his target, it would be at least consinstent at a level. Argus would speedblitz before getting sealed.
Also just reminding, Argus can at least boost himself to 270% with his sword, the sword itself also decreases durability of anyone it touches by %20. And extrafully, he can boost these attacks with %120 if he charges his attack. We don't need to mention other power boost he got, because ATP if Argus ever lands a critical damage it is over. Argus stomps hard.
If so, then nevermind speed argument, then.I mean this is a problem of the supporters not updating the pages tbh, u can't expect that we take things which are non in profile
Otherwise Xiao would get upgraded to Island lvl, Class G and High Hypersonic
not on his profile as far as I can see. Can you specify what this is?If so, then nevermind speed argument, then.
Well, then Argus' only wincon is here then wanting some blessing from the God of Destruction to power up himself. God of Destruction governs "destruction" itself. Does Xiao have any answer to this CM type 2?
It is battle applicable? + again Profile doesnt mention Conceptual Manipulation at allGod of Destruction governs "destruction" itself. Does Xiao have any answer to this CM type 2?
Well, he got blessing on his profile. It is not explained on profile, but still on profile.not on his profile as far as I can see. Can you specify what this is?
Xiao also gets empowerment and healing when in the presence of evil gods or their auras so I assumed this would backfire on Argus tremendously
pretty sure Unholy Manipulation is the exact thing that gives Xiao the buffs. Being empowered by an evil god/dark god should qualify for thisWell, he got blessing on his profile. It is not explained on profile, but still on profile.
Argus' case is that his unholy manipulation is about having powers of chaos and abyss/darkness that is opposite of power of order and light, and so Rafael's holy manip etc doesn't work on him, so that is why it is index as unholy manip. Argus is not a evil god nor he is evil, nor he carries an evil aura (maybe just darkness), he simply got corrupted by the abyss and became the Fallen Angel.
It is.It is battle applicable? + again Profile doesnt mention Conceptual Manipulation at all
Being a god of destruction doesn't make you evil, nor working for Lord of Darkness makes you evil. He was an angel of light before getting corrupted. He is still an angel, but now with powers of chaos rather than order. I mean arguing that every type of unholy manip buffing Xiao is a NLF.pretty sure Unholy Manipulation is the exact thing that gives Xiao the buffs. Being empowered by an evil god/dark god should qualify for this
this is literally the most basic barebones version of Unholy Manipulation I've ever seen. He doesn't gain anything special, nor is it that much different than the karma that exists in Genshin ImpactBeing a god of destruction doesn't make you evil, nor working for Lord of Darkness makes you evil. He was an angel of light before getting corrupted. He is still an angel, but now with powers of chaos rather than order. I mean arguing that every type of unholy manip buffing Xiao is a NLF.
Xiao has several offensive buffs of his own, as well as a means of increasing his own durability, of which Argus does not. On top of this, he outspeeds Argus by a very large margin, and due to Argus's Unholy manipulation, Xiao gets what is basically phys vamp on all of his attacks, which already significantly outscale Argus's durability. Argus can't do anything hereAlso just reminding, Argus can at least boost himself to 270% with his sword, the sword itself also decreases durability of anyone it touches by %20. And extrafully, he can boost these attacks with %120 if he charges his attack. We don't need to mention other power boost he got, because ATP if Argus ever lands a critical damage it is over. Argus stomps hard.
this is literally the most basic barebones version of Unholy Manipulation I've ever seen. He doesn't gain anything special, nor is it that much different than the karma that exists in Genshin Impact
Argus is evil. Arguing that he's not is genuinely absurd
Little did he know that the reason his blade possessed such a monumental power, the reason it imparted those lost memories to him, was because it was cursed by the God of Destruction: Cyd. His mind was tainted by this malevolent curse, awakening within him a cruel brutality. Argus was driven by his own rage.
It seemed to her that Argus had, for reasons unknown, lost himself to the darkness, welcomed its embrace. Countless humans had been slaughtered by his hand. Despite all of this. He was still her flesh and blood, her brother: and she couldn’t bear to raise her sword against him
doesn't really matter if it's kind of mind control or mind corruption, he's still evil. Cyd is also blatantly evil and his curse is called malevolent
karma also doesn't only come from only evil gods. It comes out from any god with hatred and power, of which Argus has both. He's empowered by Cyd, a god with malevolence, power, and hatred. This qualifies for the buff
Xiao has several offensive buffs of his own, as well as a means of increasing his own durability, of which Argus does not. On top of this, he outspeeds Argus by a very large margin, and due to Argus's Unholy manipulation, Xiao gets what is basically phys vamp on all of his attacks, which already significantly outscale Argus's durability. Argus can't do anything here
ok well if he's High 6A then he stomps yeah, this should be closedWait, it is accepted that Argus is High 6-A, likely above Khufra.
![]()
Mobile Legends Upgrades
Some upgrades for MLBB Verse. 1. Conceptual Manipulation Type 2 (or Type 1) for Unique God: Unique God created the Land of Dawn using Order and Chaos. In Part II Chapter IV, Twilight Origins "She dreamed of the unique god, that he made a world of order and chaos. She couldn’t see the face of...vsbattles.com
Argus literally one taps if we include his extra damage boost, 40% ignoring defense + 20% decreasing durability of opponents and critical hits and extra critical damage boost.
Argus isn't being mind controlled, he was shown the truth of his birth or whatever and has done bad things like kill innocents and overall is an evil person after learning the truth.You absolutelly ignored that the fact that Argus driven into that mindset by curse of the god, and he lost himself and became acting in wrath. This is like saying everyone loses control when they are mad, so having ability to being mad makes you auto evil.
Xiao gets powered up in the presence of an evil god's power, not the presence of the evil god themselves. Xiao's feat is him getting powered up by what is basically the byproduct emotions of gods who are already dead, so Cyd's physical presence isn't necessaryEven if we agree that the god that powers up Argus is evil, it resides in the realm of gods. Unless Xiao has some power to sense the evilness from the god across realms, I don't think it would trigger his power.
what exactly does this entail? Argus simply gets power from Cyd. This doesn't provide any notable hax or anything. "Blessing" is the most vague term in the world. You need to explain what exactly this provides (besides power which we've discussed already) and how it helpsEven if he triggers his power, he still have no answer to Argus blessing.
Argus doesn't have infinite stamina, so I assumed that Xiao could outlast due to having better stamina featsAbout the buffs, sure he is faster but all those damages are nothing if he can't bypass Immortality bestowed from the God of Destruction. God doesn't let Argus be "destroyed" hence why Argus immune to death or destruction when he draws his sword.
Dude, i mean vs wiki profile, why u linking another fandom?It is.
"possessed such a monumental power"
Its just him using his mask (which he even uses to jump low tiers) so yeah in character he would most likely use it to begin and since the empowerment its a passive dependent of enviroment, then yeah, Xiao getting the possible buffsUnless Xiao has some power to sense the evilness from the god across realms, I don't think it would trigger his power.
It wasn't accepted, for a threath to be accepted u need 2 moderators accepting it, there no sight of a moderator even agreeing to this threath, on top of that the threath was closed and is 2 years old, meaning a lot of things could had happend such as a downgradeWait, it is accepted that Argus is High 6-A, likely above Khufra.
Sorry for wasting your time, man. I could have check the CRTs before arguing. Anyways, Argus wins.Argus isn't being mind controlled, he was shown the truth of his birth or whatever and has done bad things like kill innocents and overall is an evil person after learning the truth.
it's also not his power, it's Cyd's, so his own personality wouldn't really be a factor for this
Xiao gets powered up in the presence of an evil god's power, not the presence of the evil god themselves. Xiao's feat is him getting powered up by what is basically the byproduct emotions of gods who are already dead, so Cyd's physical presence isn't necessary
what exactly does this entail? Argus simply gets power from Cyd. This doesn't provide any notable hax or anything. "Blessing" is the most vague term in the world. You need to explain what exactly this provides (besides power which we've discussed already) and how it helps
Argus doesn't have infinite stamina, so I assumed that Xiao could outlast due to having better stamina feats
The thread is old and was closed. The verse is very unpopular, and when a mod do close CRT, they do mention it if it is not accepted or etc. However, this CRT was closed when some dudes agreed with the CRT and demanded it to be closed. It is clear as day that the CRT is accepted.Dude, i mean vs wiki profile, why u linking another fandom?
Its just him using his mask (which he even uses to jump low tiers) so yeah in character he would most likely use it to begin and since the empowerment its a passive dependent of enviroment, then yeah, Xiao getting the possible buffs
It wasn't accepted, for a threath to be accepted u need 2 moderators accepting it, there no sight of a moderator even agreeing to this threath, on top of that the threath was closed and is 2 years old, meaning a lot of things could had happend such as a downgrade
If its just 2 random users it doesnt get pass as accepted, it needs the output of 2 threath moderatorsHowever, this CRT was closed when some dudes agreed with the CRT and demanded it to be closed.
It was not accepted, unless u can proof 2 moderators actually agree (not to mention in the span of 2 years there could had been a threath downgrading Argus, so yeah it doesn't hold)It is clear as day that the CRT is accepted.
But we are comparing the 2 profiles in this wiki, if a profile its outdated it's the supporters fault for not making enough crts/not updating the pages, if we go for "well its actually X story but since my verse hasn't been updated" i can bring 20 Gigatons, Class G Xiao to kinda winuddy, I already told you that the page doesn't have justification about it. I didn't show you some information made by some fandom member, but full story of Argus in the wiki.
You just repeated yourself in a format of demanding proof without rebutting the fact that the CRT was closed. Why would any mod would close it for nothing without mentioning anything? You are not debunking the fact it was closed after an agreement. So it counts.If its just 2 random users it doesnt get pass as accepted, it needs the output of 2 threath moderators
It was not accepted, unless u can proof 2 moderators actually agree (not to mention in the span of 2 years there could had been a threath downgrading Argus, so yeah it doesn't hold)
But we are comparing the 2 profiles in this wiki, if a profile its outdated it's the supporters fault for not making enough crts/not updating the pages, if we go for "well its actually X story but since my verse hasn't been updated" i can bring 20 Gigatons, Class G Xiao to kinda win
The guy's right, though. At minimum, you need two staff approvals, and three if the proposed changes are particularly controversial, such as high tier (like Tier 1) revisions or fundamental haxes like Conceptual Manipulation, Plot Manipulation, and similar abilities.You just repeated yourself in a format of demanding proof without rebutting the fact that the CRT was closed. Why would any mod would close it for nothing without mentioning anything? You are not debunking the fact it was closed after an agreement. So it counts.
Your case is irrelevant here. If you have a CRT that is accepted but is not applied, sure show that to here because it will count as long as the CRT's agreement is older than this thread. But if it is about your own whatever thinking... Well, you don't have to argue with me much. After all, I am not here to make you change your opinion, and it seems I can't because you seem to have have an absolute belief about your ideas.
Anyways, we can at worst ask this to mod if it counts or not but 'till then, my vote is to Argus.
I am sorry if my replies showed me as a ignorant person or anything like that. What you said is not rude, but I am still thank you for saying it.The guy's right, though. At minimum, you need two staff approvals, and three if the proposed changes are particularly controversial, such as high tier (like Tier 1) revisions or fundamental haxes like Conceptual Manipulation, Plot Manipulation, and similar abilities.
Not trying to be rude, but you can always look this stuff up instead of blindly believing whatever gets passed around. All I'm saying is, you should read the site's rules before being certain about something. As for the rule I mentioned, you can read it here.
Looking back at the CRT, there doesn't even seem to be any actual agreement from the members to begin with. There are only two people commenting: one is asking for clarification, while the other is discussing a separate point. Neither of those constitutes agreement.However, in this case we have an unknowable thread closing right after a agreement of some members, I assuming they were the supports at that time. I know that we must see two thread mod agreement on thread, so ATP, we can ask for a mod to clarify things. Or else, I will re-search their message walls to see if this is handled in message walls due being being a very non-popular verse.
I will not want to deep about this, so I will concede.Looking back at the CRT, there doesn't even seem to be any actual agreement from the members to begin with. There are only two people commenting: one is asking for clarification, while the other is discussing a separate point. Neither of those constitutes agreement.
A CRT being closed can happen for a variety of reasons. For example, the OP might simply put a request in this page, asking for it to be closed. That doesn't automatically mean the moderators agreed with the proposal. If the staff actually agree with a CRT, they have a much more straightforward way of showing it... they comment on the CRT itself.
In any case, it doesn't change the fact that you still need two staff approvals for a CRTs to be accepted. It doesn't have any other way beside this.