Would this qualify for Transduality?

[Vietthai96]

What if a Taoisam is a thing in verse? Straight up stated that there is Taoisam in verse, Wuji and Taiji are a genuine things( there are quotes directly from Taoisam about it)

What if Taoism is a thing in verse?

Again, is a thing in what way?, a verse can mention Daoism, Taoism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, etc...and they still mean nothing

Generally speaking if they are genuine thing, of course it can be duality, but again like i said, that thing need evaluation, can't be sure here since this is just Q&A and question is mostly broad question

 

[Wikisource]

Would the mention of Yin and Yang being opposite of each other, but still dependant a bit on the other to function qualify as Nondual?

I think we should consider how the opposition here is concretized because in short, things that are dualistic are opposites but many of them do not fit the duality standard on this wiki (for e.g, fire and water). In fact, Yin and Yang have been considered two opposites from the beginning so the second thing to consider is how they depend, which I think is more complicated. For e.g, Light and Dark depend on each other to define each other... In general, I personally think the answer depends on the context given.

 

[Laviossiii]

Just because the page say "alternatively" doesn't make the former part before it being less or not correct.

False equivalent, girl and existence are different thing, also contextually speaking, a verse can make girl and non-girl a duality, they can make anything duality as long as the authors, writers want it no matter how absurb it is.

The page said it already
1. Existence and nonexistence by default is a duality unless proven otherwise to be not a duality
2. Other systems need to be proven to be a duality and isn't assumed as so by default

The page said 'not existence,' then nonexistence and void. Both are concepts that etymologically oppose existence, you can't ignore that. And yes, it is case by case.