This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Amazing job on the abilities, p straight forward I find the low 2-C Stuff as mentioned pretty well constructed and just to be clear the low 2-C stuff is "low 2-c with the pen" right? (and yes this is an agree)
Amazing job on the abilities, p straight forward I find the low 2-C Stuff as mentioned pretty well constructed and just to be clear the low 2-C stuff is "low 2-c with the pen" right? (and yes this is an agree)
So I think it's made pretty clear that the pen's powers are Low 2-C/4D in that it can affect this entire Episode World.
Let's start.
Many may think "Why does it have to be Plot Manipulation and not Reality Warping?"
The main difference between these two powers is their context. If metafictional context is present, the skill is Plot Manipulation, and if metafictional context is not present, the skill is Reality Warping.
As you can see, a lot of metafictional context, since not only are they "distorting reality", they are manipulating the "World of Episodes" that is in an animation tool and that is where the episodes of the cartoon take place.
-
-
-
But the question is, why did I also put Reality Warping?
Well, Woody also uses the pen in "Animator's World", and there's no metafictional context here, so I put both. If someone says they don't always need to show the metafictional context if they've already shown it before, I can remove the Reality Warping I put.
But why? Because those two pieces of equipment he used were taken by his Dimensional Storage. So he can always bring those two equipments from that skill.
EDIT: In the P&A section it will look like this: In the P&A section the name Optional Equipment will be changed to Equipment.
And it will stay like this on the list
Votes Agree: (2;0)@Lonkitt(NOTE: Limited Power Nullification for Technology Manipulation), @LordGriffin1000 (Neutral in Abilities)
Sorry if this was already in the profile and I missed it, but more evidence for Woody, he can exist outside the scope of his episode in the black void after it has ended. In Wicket Wacky, as the closing dark color swallowed everything along with his body, only his head was left. Woody was perfectly fine and in this black void outside the episode's world as just the head.
Sorry if this was already in the profile and I missed it, but more evidence for Woody, he can exist outside the scope of his episode in the black void after it has ended. In Wicket Wacky, as the closing dark color swallowed everything along with his body, only his head was left. Woody was perfectly fine and in this black void outside the episode's world as just the head.
One staff vote is missing for "Resistances (2), Statistics (2) and Changes (2)"
And there are two votes left for the staff for "Abilities (1)"
Of course, if Andytrenom isn't disagreeing on any of these topics in general. Since I asked him three times how he wanted me to cast his vote and he didn't respond.
But what toon force prevents this? Just because something is toon force doesn't mean that's all it is.
Toon force would be similar to Reality Warping and Magic in the sense that through it the character can do various application things.
Similarly to Reality Warping or Magic, Toon force has uncountable applications and virtually no users are able to employ all of them. As such other abilities archieved through this power should be listed on the page to specify the scope of the character's use of Toon Force.
Here it explicitly says that through Toon Force other powers can come, such as magic or Reality Warping.
We don't just give "Magic" to someone who uses elemental or temporal or other powers because it is done through magic. And we don't just give Reality Warping to someone who uses this power to manipulate space and time.
But what toon force prevents this? Just because something is toon force doesn't mean that's all it is.
Toon force would be similar to Reality Warping and Magic in the sense that through it the character can do various application things.
Here it explicitly says that through Toon Force other powers can come, such as magic or Reality Warping.
We don't just give "Magic" to someone who uses elemental or temporal or other powers because it is done through magic. And we don't just give Reality Warping to someone who uses this power to manipulate space and time.
Just because everything he does is Reality Warping doesn't mean we won't list what he's capable of doing with his main power.
It's the same thing for Woody, as a toon character, practically everything he does could be classified as "toon force" such as pulling items out of thin air like weapons or objects, but even so we list ourselves as dimensional storage and not just "toon force".
Also, I wouldn't focus so much on the limitations on the page, because it's just "Possible". Woody has used his powers to kill other guys, and "funny" is a real thing. Woody does what the "script" needs to entertain people, it's not a literal weakness that he has to "just do funny things".
I mean, I know it's a controversial thing. It was just an ability that was "left over", because I don't think it's attack reflection or damage transfer like I said above.
But don't you think I could be a reflection of an attack? Considering that while the guillotine was falling the cutting effect was going on Woody's antagonist in this episode?
But don't you think I could be a reflection of an attack? Considering that while the guillotine was falling the cutting effect was going on Woody's antagonist in this episode?
Tbh, i think Damage transferal would suit better instead of Attack reflection. But the reason why I don't think it could be would be the effect, the guillotine in theory should have cut off his head, if it was Damage transferal or attack reflection he would have been decapitated but here the "funny" factor was what prevented this, so I'm not sure what to suggest.
It seems to me that Damage Transferal works. Some characters reallocate the damage somewhere else, the target doesn't need to take damage in the exact same way they'd have, only a similar amount. In this case damage from the guillotine was transferred to the back instead of the head.
It seems to me that Damage Transferal works. Some characters reallocate the damage somewhere else, the target doesn't need to take damage in the exact same way they'd have, only a similar amount. In this case damage from the guillotine was transferred to the back instead of the head.
Tbh, i think Damage transferal would suit better instead of Attack reflection. But the reason why I don't think it could be would be the effect, the guillotine in theory should have cut off his head, if it was Damage transferal or attack reflection he would have been decapitated but here the "funny" factor was what prevented this, so I'm not sure what to suggest.
It seems to me that Damage Transferal works. Some characters reallocate the damage somewhere else, the target doesn't need to take damage in the exact same way they'd have, only a similar amount. In this case damage from the guillotine was transferred to the back instead of the head.
Transferring wounds does not necessarily remove the wounds from the afflicted user. This ability is not to be confused with Attack Reflection, which reflects attacks rather than transfer injuries.
The ability can also be used to have the target such as an object or person take damage for the user or have the target suffer the same damage they have suffered.
And it is also explicitly said that damage transfers transfers wounds.
Transferring wounds does not necessarily remove the wounds from the afflicted user. This ability is not to be confused with Attack Reflection, which reflects attacks rather than transfer injuries.
Woody wasn't hurt, and the attack hadn't even reached him while he was cutting the bear.
-
-
-
And what you mentioned doesn't exactly refute "taking damage for the user". That damage didn't even come close to Woody.
It's not like the guillotine hit Woody and the damage went to the bear. Before getting to Woody, Woody was already fixed.
It would be as if I shot someone, and while the bullet was traveling through the air, it was causing me harm.
Probably these two most controversial skills (nullification of power and causality) will be left for another topic, since the "skills" section will probably get 3 first votes and I don't want to prolong this specific crt any longer, since I don't want to stay prolonging possible agreements.
This is meant as a back-up example to show that characters don't need to first take damage before they qualify for damage transferal. What is required is to reallocate the damage elsewhere. Damage never hit-confirms on that example, no one draws a drop of blood out of him. He reallocates every time before it hurts him.
