will this be a platonic concept?

[Seraphor12]

Hey everyone, newbie here. I have a quick question?
If there's a concept that is the source of all existence, where things like space, time, life, death, light, darkness, and every other fundamental concept originate from it and it's described as absolutely unchanging and fundamental to all reality

• Would this be considered a Platonic concept?
• And on which tier would it fall? Low 1A, 1A, or High 1A?

 

[FriendOfTheTeaParty]

shadow slave wank

 

[FriendOfTheTeaParty]

it's described as absolutely unchanging

I think this part is a bit misleading considering it's unchanging nature isn't from a result of being outside time and space (while it is outside time and space) but because desire cannot change or else it ceases to be itself and that its nature is suppose to fundamentally contradict the void which is everchanging.

 

[Seraphor12]

I think this part is a bit misleading considering it's unchanging nature isn't from a result of being outside time and space (while it is outside time and space) but because desire cannot change or else it ceases to be itself and that its nature is suppose to fundamentally contradict the void which is everchanging.

Yeah, that’s a good point I agree that its unchanging nature isn’t just about being outside space and time, but more about its essential definition (like how desire must remain consistent to be what it is). And yeah, I was thinking along the lines of it being the direct opposite of the Void where the Void is everchanging, chaotic, and this concept would be fixed and absolute.(Like iirc order was also born from it) Would that kind of existential opposition - unchanging vs. everchanging, impact its tiering? Like, would it make it closer to 1A or far from it? if it conceptually contradicts everything that originates from the Void?

 

[SweetDao]

I think this part is a bit misleading considering it's unchanging nature isn't from a result of being outside time and space (while it is outside time and space) but because desire cannot change or else it ceases to be itself and that its nature is suppose to fundamentally contradict the void which is everchanging.

Wank