• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

Methinks it should, at least for non-supporters. Given how many staff are there in Naruto, actually accessing it is easy by talking to them I figure
 
Looking back, it seems the page was unlocked to allow a thread to be applied and then never locked again. This is the first person to vandalize it since in six months though, so I'm kind of torn. All the same, I locked it for now.
 
It would probably be tolerable, but the older image is preferable, yeah. If it doesn't become a back and forth then no warning is necessary.
 
I think that a strict warning is probably sufficient in this case, given the extremely high preceding tier, but I may be too lenient. 🙏
 
I think that a strict warning is probably sufficient in this case, given the extremely high preceding tier, but I may be too lenient. 🙏
I warned them. I can see reason to ban them given the Tier 0 and the fact they added a new key without any information on what that key was.

All the same, there's a revision for the Source right now and the current Tier is already High 1-A.
 
Ant had also confronted him about removing matchups
The person has now admitted to removing a matchup because they disagree with it and because the removal thread doesn't work very well. While I agree with the latter part, we can't do that. I'll be reverting that and giving this person a warning. I'd suggest a warning be added for it. This person seems frustrated and seems to have reasoning behind their opinion, so this isn't a vandal. I'd still be against banning them.
 
Last edited:
This user enlarged the picture of kid Piccolo to an absurd degree and replaced the image with a lesser one. I've reverted the edits and asked the user not to do this. No further action needed, I don't think.
 
Back
Top