• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

The profile overall is fine, structure and format speaking, though the lack of scan is jarring indeed, however they at least put reference on

There are a Lamb film in 2021 though, the villain wiki is mostly for anyone who interest in general information of the character since many films have no dedicated wiki page for them

This case i think it is fine, though let see other opinion
It provided no evidence for the character's feats, and instead just used references that made claims through text without it. 🙏
 
I do not think that it seems necessary to ban them yet. 🙏
Agreed. I think they were trying to make calculations. I gave them an instruction regarding using blogs instead of making pages, and gave them a direct link to their own blog section on the Wiki.
 
It is likely an accurate edit, but I will ask about it. 🙏

Edit: I have done so:

 
Last edited:
I know it's extremely minor, but I was messaged anonymously. @StrikerIsJustStriker made changes to this page. For the most part, it's an improvement, but as mentioned by SomebodyData, removing the "Superhuman" low end on Lifting Strength is still a change that would require a content revision related discussion. Or if it was discussed previously, there needs to be a link.

Last time was two months ago, and it's better than previous edits. But someone still pointed out that it's still a repeated pattern of not learning from previous staff message. No punishment needed I'd say, but still something worth of note that we prefer him to link evidence each and every time an edit consists of changing, adding, or removing bolded statistics rating.
 
I know it's extremely minor, but I was messaged anonymously. @StrikerIsJustStriker made changes to this page. For the most part, it's an improvement, but as mentioned by SomebodyData, removing the "Superhuman" low end on Lifting Strength is still a change that would require a content revision related discussion. Or if it was discussed previously, there needs to be a link.

Last time was two months ago, and it's better than previous edits. But someone still pointed out that it's still a repeated pattern of not learning from previous staff message. No punishment needed I'd say, but still something worth of note that we prefer him to link evidence each and every time an edit consists of changing, adding, or removing bolded statistics rating.
@StrikerIsJustStriker

Your attention is needed here. 🙏
 
I know it's extremely minor, but I was messaged anonymously. @StrikerIsJustStriker made changes to this page. For the most part, it's an improvement, but as mentioned by SomebodyData, removing the "Superhuman" low end on Lifting Strength is still a change that would require a content revision related discussion. Or if it was discussed previously, there needs to be a link.

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT






Last time was two months ago, and it's better than previous edits. But someone still pointed out that it's still a repeated pattern of not learning from previous staff message. No punishment needed I'd say, but still something worth of note that we prefer him to link evidence each and every time an edit consists of changing, adding, or removing bolded statistics rating.
I accidentally removed Superhuman LS while editing which I didn't notice. I only wanted to add the feat within LS section. I should add it back if you want
 
Last edited:
It is likely an accurate edit, but I will ask about it. 🙏

Edit: I have done so:

I was told that it should be reverted, and EddisherSound has already done so. 🙏
 
This user made this page, which has statistics that seem to not be related to any measurement on the Wiki.

I'm not sure what to do though, since they don't sound unreasonable and it's not a low-quality page.
 
This user made this page, which has statistics that seem to not be related to any measurement on the Wiki.

I'm not sure what to do though, since they don't sound unreasonable and it's not a low-quality page.
It seems fine to me, except for a lifting strength naming correction and that the header image doesn't seem to work properly. 🙏
 
And I'm not exactly sure this person's done here. They seem to have renamed a verse or something, and made a new category. I did notice they've been warned multiple times in the past.
I googled/verified that the new verse title is correct, removed the artificial name change code, genuinely properly renamed the page in question, updated the new verse category, and renamed the old "Alphabet" category to "Alphabet Lore" for a blog that used the old category. 🙏
 
Sandbox worthy profile
 
Can someone tell this user to stop using "Statistical Values" to define non-numerical data
Also, he makes massive changes to profiles without a CRT as seen here, here, here, here, well its alot
Since they kept creating pages with pure guesswork statistics and changing statistics and powers and abilities for preexisting pages, despite multiple warnings, I banned them for 3 months. 🙏
 
Back
Top