• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Page Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

Requesting that Maylene (Pokémon) be moved to a sandbox for similar reasons to why the Gloria and Calem profiles were

A) Use of Masters EX scaling which is considered non canon, despite profile creator being told not to use it without making a CRT.
B) Incorrect scaling as a whole, trying to scale her way too highly based on no information (Trying to scale her to the main legendaries of the games despite having no canon interaction or battle with them, or any proof she made the main character struggle)
C) a lot of assumptions made on profile that aren’t properly discussed, such as Dawn having a Torterra to fight. A lot of misleading info too overall
D) Doesn’t follow standard formatting for Pokémon trainer profiles
 
B) Incorrect scaling as a whole, trying to scale her way too highly based on no information (Trying to scale her to the main legendaries of the games despite having no canon interaction or battle with them, or any proof she made the main character struggle)
This is the only one I'd bring contention to, since it is a game and we accept most post-game shit as canon for RPGs unless the shit is explicitly not canon as stated to us.
 
Requesting that Maylene (Pokémon) be moved to a sandbox for similar reasons to why the Gloria and Calem profiles were

A) Use of Masters EX scaling which is considered non canon, despite profile creator being told not to use it without making a CRT.
B) Incorrect scaling as a whole, trying to scale her way too highly based on no information (Trying to scale her to the main legendaries of the games despite having no canon interaction or battle with them, or any proof she made the main character struggle)
C) a lot of assumptions made on profile that aren’t properly discussed, such as Dawn having a Torterra to fight. A lot of misleading info too overall
D) Doesn’t follow standard formatting for Pokémon trainer profiles
these characters are very popular. we could fix them.
 
This is the only one I'd bring contention to, since it is a game and we accept most post-game shit as canon for RPGs unless the shit is explicitly not canon as stated to us.
Well yeah they’re using masters ex scaling too for a stat lmao, you’ve been in the thread and saw yourself

Either way the scaling just isn’t there and was based around favoritism. There’s nothing post game that says Maylene is capable of scaling to Dawn just because she has an optional post canon fight, as opposed to something in story.
 
these characters are very popular pokemon. we could fix them.
Fix them but they’re blatantly using a ton of assumptions and faulty scaling, which is why I’m recommending moving it to a sandbox. The creator of said profile was told to not use masters ex scaling and ignored it, while still giving blow back.

Fix it overall but it’s overall a very messy scaling and OP has no intention of fixing it
 
Well yeah they’re using masters ex scaling too for a stat lmao, you’ve been in the thread and saw yourself
That was point A, Jinx.
Either way the scaling just isn’t there and was based around favoritism. There’s nothing post game that says Maylene is capable of scaling to Dawn just because she has an optional post canon fight, as opposed to something in story.
And you have already gotten railed by everyone on this line of thinking man
 
That was point A, Jinx.
??? What are you even tryna respond to
And you have already gotten railed by everyone on this line of thinking man
So are you just here to ragebait and obstruct?

There’s a difference when this character literally has nothing saying she scales to this level of power just cause she’s a fight you can have post game with no semblance of canon to the fact the protag struggles to beat her

Thinking every rematch fight you have qualified all characters to scale above the main legendary just diminishes the whole lore and story in the first place
 
The more Pokémon pages made like this, the harder the verse is going to be to fix in the future. The page is blatantly going against what was discussed before
 
??? What are you even tryna respond to
You see how your post was structured?
Requesting that Maylene (Pokémon) be moved to a sandbox for similar reasons to why the Gloria and Calem profiles were

A) Use of Masters EX scaling which is considered non canon, despite profile creator being told not to use it without making a CRT.
B) Incorrect scaling as a whole, trying to scale her way too highly based on no information (Trying to scale her to the main legendaries of the games despite having no canon interaction or battle with them, or any proof she made the main character struggle)
C) a lot of assumptions made on profile that aren’t properly discussed, such as Dawn having a Torterra to fight. A lot of misleading info too overall
D) Doesn’t follow standard formatting for Pokémon trainer profiles
You have four points, labeled A, B, C, and D.

I cut out all of the points but B, which I said this about:
This is the only one I'd bring contention to, since it is a game and we accept most post-game shit as canon for RPGs unless the shit is explicitly not canon as stated to us.
And it is also what we're arguing about now.
So are you just here to ragebait and obstruct?
Yes, Becauase everyone who disagrees with you is now obstructing. Ya make BoS Vegeta seem humble man
There’s a difference when this character literally has nothing saying she scales to this level of power just cause she’s a fight you can have post game

Thinking every rematch fight you have qualified all characters to scale above the main legendary just diminishes the whole lore and story in the first place
So does powerscaling like 90% of the time, it's a different way to look at things and can take away from the story if you get too far into it! Shit, trainer scaling is ****** from the jump because our profiles are for Wild Pokémon so there's very little to properly scale them to!
 
You see how your post was structured?
You have four points, labeled A, B, C, and D.

I cut out all of the points but B, which I said this about:

And it is also what we're arguing about now.

All this weird formatting and I still don’t get wha you’re trying to point out? Yeah I made 4 points? I know
Yes, Becauase everyone who disagrees with you is now obstructing. Ya make BoS Vegeta seem humble man
It is when you’ve obviously made me a target to the point you’re following me into threads and inserting yourself into the convos just because of some Overwatch thing in the past. You aren’t being slick and I wish I didn’t have to deal with it personally. Please mind your own business
So does powerscaling like 90% of the time, it's a different way to look at things and can take away from the story if you get too far into it! Shit, trainer scaling is ****** from the jump because our profiles are for Wild Pokémon so there's very little to properly scale them to!
this isn’t even a point what? Powerscaling ‘doesn’t make sense’ therefore we shouldn’t be critical about how we mix in game mechanics over the lore?
I’ve got no issue being able to scale trainers who actively prove they can fight legendaries as opposed to just handing out that scaling because they’re an optional NPC fight that just have a post game team, with no indication they can even match up to you
 
Last edited:
Can I get someone different that this reaper guy please it’s getting annoying how adamant he is on jumping on me constantly
 
All this weird formatting and I still don’t get wha you’re trying to point out? Yeah I made 4 points? I know
I was only responding to point B because the other three points were fine, hence why I worded it the way I did, saying "This is the only one I'd bring contention to" because that's the only one I have a problem with. The rest are at least agreeable.
It is when you’ve obviously made me a target to the point you’re following me into threads and inserting yourself into the convos just because of some Overwatch thing in the past yeah.
I follow RVR and Profile deletions, it's literally what drew me to the Pokémon discussion thread to see it bring hashed out, you'll notice I wasn't there before the drama spilled into a thread I actually follow. Either way, this is derailing, so take it to a wall or we drop the matter.
this isn’t even a point what? Powerscaling ‘doesn’t make sense’ therefore we shouldn’t be critical about how we mix in game mechanics over the lore?
I almost exclusively lore scale unless I don't have a choice in the matter. In terms of Pokémon Mainline Games, post-game is where you don't have a choice in the matter. If powerscaling says ***** face scales above an avatar of literal God, oh well.
 
I follow RVR and Profile deletions, it's literally what drew me to the Pokémon discussion thread to see it bring hashed out, you'll notice I wasn't there before the drama spilled into a thread I actually follow. Either way, this is derailing, so take it to a wall or we drop the matter.
You actively decided to follow me there to harass me abt Overwatch stuff, and now you’re the first to immediately jump on what I’m saying. I’m not going to your wall, stop with your moral high grounding and please leave me alone

That’s all I’m responding to since I don’t actually need it to derail
 
If a profile is from a character that appears on a single episode of a series of more than 200 episodes, doesn't affects scaling and barely has any notable ability, can it be deleted?
 
If a profile is from a character that appears on a single episode of a series of more than 200 episodes, doesn't affects scaling and barely has any notable ability, can it be deleted?
(Forgive me for not handling the requested deletions above, I'm at work and the wiki itself sucks on mobile, doubly so for admin work)

We have a rule akin to that for certain verses (Marvel Comics) but that isn't the status quo, no.
 

profile that's basically unfinished
 
As the only active supporter of this verse, I'd like these pages to be deleted because its profile is bad and outdated for me.


 
As the only active supporter of this verse, I'd like these pages to be deleted because its profile is bad and outdated for me.


I suggest applying the outdated template to them rather than deleting them.
 

His only hax is non-combat applicable, the statistics are unjustified (None calculation at all and the space he creates clearly doesn't qualifies for High 8-C) and his only notable thing besides what i mentioned is his 8-C Durability, which i don't think it's a good reason to keep with a whole profile


Unjustified AP and P&A + the rest of the profile is rated as "unknown"
 

His only hax is non-combat applicable, the statistics are unjustified (None calculation at all and the space he creates clearly doesn't qualifies for High 8-C) and his only notable thing besides what i mentioned is his 8-C Durability, which i don't think it's a good reason to keep with a whole profile


Unjustified AP and P&A + the rest of the profile is rated as "unknown"
Bump
 
The profile is very outdated, and there are no scans or feats included. Additionally, there is no profile page for the verse. Trust me bro profile.

I'm pretty sure there are no active supporters of this verse.

 

His only hax is non-combat applicable, the statistics are unjustified (None calculation at all and the space he creates clearly doesn't qualifies for High 8-C) and his only notable thing besides what i mentioned is his 8-C Durability, which i don't think it's a good reason to keep with a whole profile


Unjustified AP and P&A + the rest of the profile is rated as "unknown"
Bump
 
I've waited to see if other input was had, but it wasn't, so I'll weigh in.

A Bert Coleman profile could exist- he has combat relevant abilities (or at least, one ability), and has no real reason conceptually to be against the rules. Still, this profile is pretty bad, and I'd agree that High 8-C appears unjustified.

Similarly, I'll agree to delete the East Pines Park Army, even though they could have a profile- they just need a calc, really. Either way.
 
I've waited to see if other input was had, but it wasn't, so I'll weigh in.

A Bert Coleman profile could exist- he has combat relevant abilities (or at least, one ability), and has no real reason conceptually to be against the rules. Still, this profile is pretty bad, and I'd agree that High 8-C appears unjustified.

Similarly, I'll agree to delete the East Pines Park Army, even though they could have a profile- they just need a calc, really. Either way.
Thank you

What do you think about the below profile?

Pretty much everything said on the profile is never directly said on the show or misinterpreted (Father Time is never said to be the embodiment of time and also never resets the episode, he just sends Mordecai to the past by telling him to ride a Time Pony) and it's of very bad quality
 
Thank you

What do you think about the below profile?

Pretty much everything said on the profile is never directly said on the show or misinterpreted (Father Time is never said to be the embodiment of time and also never resets the episode, he just sends Mordecai to the past by telling him to ride a Time Pony) and it's of very bad quality
Do you happen to have a clip of that? It would make evaluating it easier and, if we decide not to delete it, adding a clip would greatly enhance the profile.
 

2016 Page with no stat justifications, and the only page based around the verse
Bump
 
Do you happen to have a clip of that? It would make evaluating it easier and, if we decide not to delete it, adding a clip would greatly enhance the profile.
The two times he appeared:

Season 2

The movie

He did say he was in his own dimension to Mordecai, but he was being affected by time itself being destroyed, there is an argument he is related to the concept of time I guess but I don't understand enough of this stuff to make a conclusive argument
 
Yeah that profile sucks, lots missing and what is there isn't explicit. I'd agree with its deletion unless someone wants to clean it up.
 
Yeah that profile sucks, lots missing and what is there isn't explicit. I'd agree with its deletion unless someone wants to clean it up.
It wouldn't be hard but he wouldn't have anything outside of Time Manip, Large Size and enhanced senses (As he can see invisible things). I don't know wenough about conceptual stuff to see if it relates to him so I wouldn't try it
 
Yeah that profile sucks, lots missing and what is there isn't explicit. I'd agree with its deletion unless someone wants to clean it up.
I'm the only one currently making and organizing CRTs for the cartoon and trust me, he pretty much doesn't have anything to work with in terms of a profile.

I don't think he even is a combat-applicable character at all

It wouldn't be hard but he wouldn't have anything outside of Time Manip, Large Size and enhanced senses (As he can see invisible things). I don't know wenough about conceptual stuff to see if it relates to him so I wouldn't try it
Conceptual stuff was already tried and most people voted against it iirc

He also wouldn't have Time Manip btw
 
I'm the only one currently making and organizing CRTs for the cartoon and trust me, he pretty much doesn't have anything to work with in terms of a profile.

I don't think he even is a combat-applicable character at all


Conceptual stuff was already tried and most people voted against it iirc

He also wouldn't have Time Manip btw
He obviously has abilities, I think a profile for him would be fine, but if you don't want to fix up his profile and would prefer it deleted, then so be it.
 

I don't think it's even in the right format..!
 
Back
Top