- 35
- 1
- Thread starter
- #281
It's No where near low 1-C I don't know why people believe thatThat's not my argument, that's the reason some people think Low 1-C.
That wouldn't be 3-A, though, either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's No where near low 1-C I don't know why people believe thatThat's not my argument, that's the reason some people think Low 1-C.
That wouldn't be 3-A, though, either.
It's basically that if you believe that the universes are their own space-time, the timeline should contain 5D space and thus Low 1-C. Is obviously wrong, so 3-A is the better optionIt's No where near low 1-C I don't know why people believe that
Seems Like Downplay To Say Zeno Is 3-A if He Can Wipe Out multiple Universes which contain a whole macroverseI think Zeno should be 3-A ngl
OhTL;DR the timeline encompassing the 12 universes technically qualifies for Low 1-C as is.
All of this is 3D still. Next?Seems Like Downplay To Say Zeno Is 3-A if He Can Wipe Out multiple Universes which contain a whole macroverse
Technically the cosmology can be argued to be as such....atleast we can brain storm on it since its fun to discuss....its Q&A thread afterall....but it won't go far.It's No where near low 1-C I don't know why people believe that
Technically not because 5-dimensional space but yeah, as we currently treat them, timelines are Low 1-C.It's basically that if you believe that the universes are their own space-time, the timeline should contain 5D space and thus Low 1-C. Is obviously wrong, so 3-A is the better option
I prefer 2-C but I see where your going with itIt's basically that if you believe that the universes are their own space-time, the timeline should contain 5D space and thus Low 1-C. Is obviously wrong, so 3-A is the better option
Hm AlrightTechnically the cosmology can be argued to be as such....atleast we can brain storm on it since its fun to discuss....its Q&A thread afterall....but it won't go far.
Yup this sounds best.Judging from how this thread came out, I think the obvious next step before people even think of downgrading or upgrading the verse is making a cosmology-thread for DBS.
Get a thread made to discuss the cosmology's make up, on whether or not the universes are separate space-times or shared space-times, and stick to that result. This debate has been on-going and has often come up in several threads because there's no clear consensus on how the verse is to be treated here. And until we come to agreement on that, this won't stop.
So Its a Discussion Whether It's Low 1-C or 3-ATechnically the cosmology can be argued to be as such....atleast we can brain storm on it since its fun to discuss....its Q&A thread afterall....but it won't go far.
AgreedJudging from how this thread came out, I think the obvious next step before people even think of downgrading or upgrading the verse is making a cosmology-thread for DBS.
Get a thread made to discuss the cosmology's make up, on whether or not the universes are separate space-times or shared space-times, and stick to that result. This debate has been on-going and has often come up in several threads because there's no clear consensus on how the verse is to be treated here. And until we come to agreement on that, this won't stop.
YupSo Its a Discussion Whether It's Low 1-C or 3-A
Yeh, It makes senseNo one is seriously saying that DBS is going to be Low 1-C ofc, is just a way to say that timelines should be such if we seriously count them as their own space-time, however:
These 3 alone prove that 2-C is obviously wrong, and even Low 2-C, since time wasn't destroyed, so just 3-A for DBS anime.
- Whis statement of all the universes being part of a single history
- Time Travel paradox cloning all the universes instead of just U7
- Zeno not erasing time as proved from Time Machine returning to Future Timeline
- Nothing stated that ROSAT or the Universes are their own space-time
Lets not be so hasty.....there is no hard and fast rule that such a paradox cannot happen to a multiverse.......Time Travel paradox cloning all the universes instead of just U7
Lets not be so hasty.....there is no hard and fast rule that such a paradox cannot happen to a multiverse.......
No direct statement = no proof. Is just a planet sized space where time is messed up and nothing elseI mean, the ROSAT is its own space-time, as is its twin brother in the Super manga.
Nothing stops this if they're part of an overarching timeline though.Time Travel paradox cloning all the universes instead of just U7
That doesen't save it from being wrong, as nothing said that these realms are their own space-time.Actually just checked the Zen'o profile, and while it dosen't link the revision thread, it does explain that the current accepted notion is that the dragon ball universes are considered to be seperate timelines that are relative to one another.
I mean, they all share the same timeline, which is a proof of time paradox affecting all universes instead of only 1Nothing stops this if they're part of an overarching timeline though.
Issue here is that is still in the same flow of time as stated from Whis, it only supports his statementNothing stops this if they're part of an overarching timeline though.
That's really dumb and somewhat reductive. No one could feel outside of it, nor could they interact with it without the ability to rip holes through dimensions, and time flows far differently in there.No direct statement = no proof. Is just a planet sized space where time is messed up and nothing else
I agree though...?I mean, they all share the same timeline, which is a proof of time paradox affecting all universes instead of only 1
We all need to really drop what we're doing, and make this thread.Judging from how this thread came out, I think the obvious next step before people even think of downgrading or upgrading the verse is making a cosmology-thread for DBS.
Get a thread made to discuss the cosmology's make up, on whether or not the universes are separate space-times or shared space-times, and stick to that result. This debate has been on-going and has often come up in several threads because there's no clear consensus on how the verse is to be treated here. And until we come to agreement on that, this won't stop.
Like I said, there was a wider revision thread, but I wasn't part of it, nor do I have it saved. You'd need to discuss it with the staff. Practically everything that covers the db ratings has been discussed a million times over though, so it'd be hard to get this big a revision through.That doesen't save it from being wrong, as nothing said that these realms are their own space-time.
oh, I thought u were counter arguing it, my bad, all this thread is confused lolI agree though...?
This tbh, this'd probably be a good start.Can we just make a cosmology thread. We about to be in 5 pages and didn't even tag DB supporters.
People rushing to do a huge downgrade or upgrade
^Can we just make a cosmology thread. We about to be in 5 pages and didn't even tag DB supporters.
People rushing to do a huge downgrade or upgrade
I mean we still need to reach a consensus here though and gather points and direction of next CRT whether or not it is upgrade or downgrade...Again:
We all need to really drop what we're doing, and make this thread.
Or else this discussion is ultimately pointless.