• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Why Is Bomberman Only 3-A

Okay after looking at this page everything seems to be accurate about it except one small thing you see why is Bomberman only 3-A i mean if he defeated the Creator of the universe then shouldn't he be Universe Level+ seeing how Universe creating feats are Universe Level+...That's all i have to say on this other than that i have no problem with this page
 
We actually do treat universe creating feats as Universal+. Mundus isn't Universe level+ because its not implied that he created space-time and I can't speak for Aesir. Since the angel(?) Bomberman created the universe, its possible it also created the space-time and thus would qualify for Low 2-C.
 
Darkanine said:
We actually do treat universe creating feats as Universal+. Mundus isn't Universe level+ because its not implied that he created space-time and I can't speak for Aesir. Since the angel(?) Bomberman created the universe, its possible it also created the space-time and thus would qualify for Low 2-C.
Actually, not only was it assumed he created one in DMC1, but he merged the human and demon worlds together, honestly though just read the humongous thread they had about that.
 
Yes, our tiering system is not flawless when it comes to finding the distinction between 3-A and Low 2-C. Our staff member The Living Tribunal1 is eventually going to suggest a change in how we define this however.
 
Antvasima said:
Yes, our tiering system is not flawless when it comes to finding the distinction between 3-A and Low 2-C. Our staff member The Living Tribunal1 is eventually going to suggest a change in how we define this however.
Ignore my last but do we upgrade BM?
 
Also, going by our current system, Low 2-C means infinite power. If this strongly contradicts a character's feats and definitions, it is usually better to keep them at 3-A. At least unless TLT1's revision is accepted by our staff.
 
Back
Top