Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All "layers" of dimensionality are still part of the concept of dimensionality. Transcending all concepts or creating all of them would scale you beyond themYeah no, that wouldn’t be my burden to prove then, you’re the one making the positive claim. In which I ask you
Why would creating all concepts make you above every complexity and layers of dimensionality? Why should we automatically allow that to qualify when that way of thinking is too lenient and literally a majority of verses could abuse that logic.
Also don’t even get me started on platonic concepts, did you know that euclidean squares exists in the realm of forms? Yeah the concept of a 2nd dimensional structure isn’t 1-A. The only arguable thing that can be argued to 1-A is The form of good, and ONLY under the presupposition that we are setting the mindscape in context of platonist that allow infinite sets and not finitist like Plato himself.
Transcending all dualities also means nothing. What if I make a 5-D character that transcends all dualities? Wouldn’t mean it’s beyond any and all extensions of a system automatically.
source?
5A, They are waiting for the arc to finish before adding the new formWhere does current shinra scale actually? And why isn't his new form in his profile
I think at best Large PlanetWhere does current shinra scale actually? And why isn't his new form in his profile
You would have to prove:All "layers" of dimensionality are still part of the concept of dimensionality. Transcending all concepts or creating all of them would scale you beyond them
Any less than omnipotent character transcending "all dualities" would be contradictory, as you can make up arbitrary dualities for the presence or absence of any kind of properties or meta properties. It all comes down to whether you can validate "all dualities" in the verse being contextually strong enough to validate 1-A.Why would the 5D character transcend all dualities? Thats self contradictory
5A, They are waiting for the arc to finish before adding the new form
Because he pushed the moon with a kick?I think at best Large Planet
Nah, I'm just high balling hereBecause he pushed the moon with a kick?
Based on whatNah, I'm just high balling here
Based on you know what why notBased on what
I want serious answersBased on you know what why not
Flawed logic. One world can have higher existential concepts then another. You seem to be one of those “conceptual transcendence is inaccessible transcendence” believers when that’s not how it works.All "layers" of dimensionality are still part of the concept of dimensionality. Transcending all concepts or creating all of them would scale you beyond them
Done.Prove that euclidean squares exist in the world of forms
and Saitama tooUpcoming Naruto Vs Shinra match
Skill stomp ggand Saitam too
please look at this , bro got 3 other people convinced.
Aspatial Atemporal concepts… meaning outside spatiotemporal dimensions immediately outer by nature. Iirc from lato himselfcan u explain why platonic concepts are 1-A?
it could be just Low 1-C.Aspatial Atemporal concepts… meaning outside spatiotemporal dimensions immediately outer by nature. Iirc from lato himself
TikTok as a whole is trash even if you discard the scaling portion. TikTok= Opinion automatically invalid
Oh you’re assuming the concepts are above a single time spaceit could be just Low 1-C
why are u assuming that it is above all dimensions of space and time?Oh you’re assuming the concepts are above a single time space
Why would an inaccessible transcendence be relevant here when we're talking about something beyond all concepts of that?Flawed logic. One world can have higher existential concepts then another. You seem to be one of those “conceptual transcendence is inaccessible transcendence” believers when that’s not how it works.
To put what I just said in perspective, imagine a continuum or world simply. We’ll say there’s 10 layers to it, the concept of dimensions can be limited in one layer of the world e.g the concept of 4-D, 5-D, 6-D, all of this would ultimately be below the unifying principle of dimensions, which in a system would be a greater concept then regular concept A. But a principle itself only covers the X amount of dimensions not the foundation of the system. Because that role goes to axioms, because that inducts the entire system and all complexities of it, why do you think the axiom of infinity here is treated as the reassurance of an infinite set within native set theory.
TL;DR You’re wrong, and your seemingly instigative attitude as well as your smug remarks of “evidence, disprove it, proof?” doesn’t make your argument any stronger than it already is weak.
Done.
???Why would an inaccessible transcendence be relevant here when we're talking about something beyond all concepts of that?
Wow, you actually just have proven to not only me, but the ENTIRE wiki thatWhat is a "layer"? That's just a made up term. And why would "principles" and "axioms" not be included in the concept of dimensions?
.......That doesn't say they exist in the world of forms, just that they exist, and even if they did exist in the world of forms, it wouldn't contradict it being 1-A
??????mathematical objects are not the only immaterial objects.
And yes it would?? Literally states natural numbers exists in the world of forms, the concept of 22 apples is not 1-A. Either you actually bring something good to the table to debate or I just dismiss all your claims, because you don't have the knowledge to back up what you say, and it shows.That doesn't say they exist in the world of forms, just that they exist, and even if they did exist in the world of forms, it wouldn't contradict it being 1-A
I don't care about Touhou???
You are treating "Character B is beyond all concepts and created them" as somehow a citation to become 1-A because you seem to fail any basic understanding of conceptual existence. Okay, touhou primordial gods are High 1-A now, because they are conceptless to the concept of dimensions. See how fallacious what you're arguing is?
Wow, you actually just have proven to not only me, but the ENTIRE wiki that
A "principle" is not included in the "concept" of dimensions because principles are the basis and foundation of every concept that exists or does not exist, without a principle, a concept cannot exist.
- You know nothing about scaling and just open your mouth because you're allowed to.
- Or you're just a blatant waste of everybody's time.
An "axiom" cannot be included in the concept of dimensions because axioms are the utmost highest point of a "concept" or in this case system. Without a "fundamental truth" to go off of, there cannot be any existence of a basis of concepts nor principles, because that world is logically impossible.
.......
??????
Oh if that's not enough, literally look up on almost any source, and it will tell you, platonist believe that mathematical structures exists in the mindscape.
And yes it would?? Literally states natural numbers exists in the world of forms, the concept of 22 apples is not 1-A. Either you actually bring something good to the table to debate or I just dismiss all your claims, because you don't have the knowledge to back up what you say, and it shows.
Which wasn't the point, it was show the instability of the logic you're proposing.I don't care about Touhou
Why is a principle the basis and foundation of every concept? And where are you getting that definition of axiom from?
You CANNOT be serious right? A natural number literally is what we humans use to count a given number of objects, you're proposing that simply again "22 apples" is 1-A. Natural numbers also belong to aleph null, that's its corresponding aleph which is only high 1-B at it's peak.How the hell is numbers existing in the world of forms relevant here at all?
Existing in a 1-A realm doesnt even make you 1-A so that point is nullWhich wasn't the point, it was show the instability of the logic you're proposing.
principle:
a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behavior or for a chain of reasoning.
A concept is merely a general notion or abstract idea, while a principle allows such general ideas to arise.
And the definition of the axiom is verbatim on here.
You CANNOT be serious right? A natural number literally is what we humans use to count a given number of objects, you're proposing that simply again "22 apples" is 1-A. Natural numbers also belong to aleph null, that's its corresponding aleph which is only high 1-B at it's peak.
Which loses its value to your own very logic. You said "hey this person scales beyond all concepts and created them so he's 1-A" which is exactly what the primordial gods did. It amazes me you couldn't even identify the justification I used given it's exactly the case here.Existing in a 1-A realm doesnt even make you 1-A so that point is null
And you're disregarding it as if your personal interpretation holds more value than the very tiering we use. Also look at wikipedia:You're appealing to vsbw's website like its some objective definition
States that an axiom is the starting point for any other general notion to be added onto. They inherently are > concepts. How do you not see this?
A concept is a general idea of something.A concept is just the idea as a whole, which includes the principle, same for axiom
Its not even about existing in a 1-A place, more like being superior to all conceptsWhich loses its value to your own very logic. You said "hey this person scales beyond all concepts and created them so he's 1-A" which is exactly what the primordial gods did. It amazes me you couldn't even identify the justification I used given it's exactly the case here.
And you're disregarding it as if your personal interpretation holds more value than the very tiering we use. Also look at wikipedia:
States that an axiom is the starting point for any other general notion to be added onto. They inherently are > concepts. How do you not see this?
A concept is a general idea of something.
A principle is the foundation of that general idea.
An axiom is the starting point of any principle or concept thus makes up the entirety of a system.
He kinda isn't one. I've been dealing with him for like a week now or so.You guys are arguing with a troll btw