- 2,636
- 1,039
Can someone tell me why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Greater Gods can affect the infinite planes, each infinite in size, that surround infinite material planes each with its own set of planes, some of them having infinite layers. And that's just the basic Greater God, with a Divinity Rating of 16; every number higher than that completely stomps the last one (and can go up to 20), bypassing any immunity and resistance of the lower one.I heard that the verse got some infinite scaling chain or something?
It's the work of 40+ years. Of course it's bound to be insane. ovoTabletop games and the people who work on them frighten me because the lore is batshit crazy 98% of the time-
Yaep. I'm not that versed in D&D, just about the same as the average RPG afficionado, methinks, and that statement is very true.Aye. Just like anything with a long lifespan, crazy shit happens at some point.
with enough wank and NLF, not even DnD can beat gokuLAYERS AND MORE LAYERS
ALL HAX IN VERSE BEING RESISTED BY EVERYONE AND ALL HAX IN THE VERSE APPLIES TO ALL VSBW HAX
that's it really.
Are you still bringing up my thread? Do I live rent-free in your head? Snap out of it man. This isn't the place or the time.with enough wank and NLF, not even DnD can beat goku
I think that even Kid Goku solo dnd verse. At beginning of series he is an epic level characterwith enough wank and NLF, not even DnD can beat goku
dnd is either fodder or too powerful to be good in debatesAll of your posts have been saying D&D is fodder, yes. I apologize that D&D nerd bad tabletop reaches High 1-A and Goku does not.
If Lumi is the DM, as the forgotten realms q&a tell, then he can put himself or anything he wants as infinitely superior to the likes of the rulers of the far realm, that are already infinitely superior to baseline 1-A. His control is such, that he can create as many hierarchies as he wants, and still see them all as fiction, no matter how many or how complex he makes them. That's why he has High 1-A as a possible.dnd is either fodder or too powerful to be good in debates
also i think high 1-A is sus and i would rather have it be 2 layers into 1-A at the most
not enough evidence for me, but let's agree to disagree.If Lumi is the DM, as the forgotten realms q&a tell, then he can put himself or anything he wants as infinitely superior to the likes of the rulers of the far realm, that are already infinitely superior to baseline 1-A. His control is such, that he can create as many hierarchies as he wants, and still see them all as fiction, no matter how many or how complex he makes them. That's why he has High 1-A as a possible.
Frankly what you'd rather have the verse at isn't really important. I'd rather have the verse peak at Tier 2. What we have now, however, is genuinely the most accurate. Everything up to 1-A is the most straightforward justifications I have seen for those ratings on this wiki, and I've seen some real mental gymnastics in those departments. I generally distrust our "high tier experts" due to their inconsistencies, but two of them equally supported Lumi being rated as High 1-A based on the evidence (I seem to recall one of them pushing for 0 as well).dnd is either fodder or too powerful to be good in debates
also i think high 1-A is sus and i would rather have it be 2 layers into 1-A at the most
To the profiles defense, the justification for High 1-A were in the large blog post linked in the 1-A section. Which is where the relevant scan is.but the High 1-A, which has a more iffy justification, don't even have a single scan.
High 1-A is a harder justification if we had that 1-A old one upgrade pushed through tbfbut two of them equally supported Lumi being rated as High 1-A based on the evidence (I seem to recall one of them pushing for 0 as well).
I can actually explain why the 1-A bit is somewhat asinine in terms of how many sources are given. At some point in the distant past, a few staff members (mainly Matt, at the time) were displeased with D&D, early on into our work with it. Matt came into a thread about the higher tier stuff (1-A and High 1-B) and denied everything, even when shown scans, so when it got put through basically everything in regards to those was spelled out painstakingly.Tbh I think it's kinda odd how well sourced the 1-A part of their profile is, but the High 1-A, which has a more iffy justification, don't even have a single scan.
Not saying the rating's necessarily wrong, but it mostly read itself as "author tier character so inaccessible".
Oh, I didn't know it was that blog. I remember disagreeing with its reasonning for high 1-A there (and after checking it looks like it didn't change); but it's my bad on the justification not being sourced.To the profiles defense, the justification for High 1-A were in the large blog post linked in the 1-A section. Which is where the relevant scan is.
So that's why 1-A and coe seemed more "solid". Understood.I can actually explain why the 1-A bit is somewhat asinine in terms of how many sources are given. At some point in the distant past, a few staff members (mainly Matt, at the time) were displeased with D&D, early on into our work with it. Matt came into a thread about the higher tier stuff (1-A and High 1-B) and denied everything, even when shown scans, so when it got put through basically everything in regards to those was spelled out painstakingly.
I know little to **** all about the High 1-A thing besides that I had to pester Ultima and Aeyu for ages to get them to give me a solid damn answer.
I'm simply explaining why as you questioned it. I don't know enough about the new standards for tier 1 and above (as even tier 2 is wack this days), so whether is enough or not, meh.not enough evidence for me, but let's agree to disagree.
ok i agree that tier 2 is wackI'm simply explaining why as you questioned it. I don't know enough about the new standards for tier 1 and above (as even tier 2 is wack this days), so whether is enough or not, meh.