What tier would these characters be???

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Say there are a group of characters who are shown to be 5-Dimensional. On top of that, they are shown to be so large that the normal universe is merely a point in their perspective that they can hold without any problem. Finally, they view a standard universe as pretty much a movie which they can manipulate and control at their will.

Would this be Low 1-C????


Also, these characters are stated to not have any cause or effect, which is why they are impossible to even interact with. Would this give acausality of some type???

 

[Galaxi789]

is from some verse

 

[NIK_FARIS]

It should be low 1-C.

Acausality type 4 or 5 but need more context for this.

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

Low 1-C sounds legit.

 

[Vietthai96]

Low 1-C. Acausality is a no, more context is require

 

[Galaxi789]

Say there are a group of characters who are shown to be 5-Dimensional. On top of that, they are shown to be so large that the normal universe is merely a point in their perspective that they can hold without any problem. Finally, they view a standard universe as pretty much a movie which they can manipulate and control at their will.

Would this be Low 1-C????


Also, these characters are stated to not have any cause or effect, which is why they are impossible to even interact with. Would this give acausality of some type???

is from some verse

 

[Cat275]

Say there are a group of characters who are shown to be 5-Dimensional. On top of that, they are shown to be so large that the normal universe is merely a point in their perspective that they can hold without any problem. Finally, they view a standard universe as pretty much a movie which they can manipulate and control at their will.

Would this be Low 1-C????

Yes

Also, these characters are stated to not have any cause or effect, which is why they are impossible to even interact with. Would this give acausality of some type???

Acau 4 maybe 5 maybe needs a bit more context here.

 

[Sniper670]

Low 1C.

Acausality type 5 for sure.

I wanted to add something but I'll be bombarded with "this is whataboutism" so I'll just say you'll get Aca 5

 

[Cat275]

I wanted to add something but I'll be bombarded with "this is whataboutism" so I'll just say you'll get Aca 5

What ya wanna say?

 

[Sniper670]

If a character has no cause or effect, it's Aca 5. They exist outside the causality system. A certain character:

What is more fascinating, a girl that neither existed in past memory nor future possibility, someone who should have no connection, no cause or effect to this world, joined seemlessly in your world.

What more context do you need. Y'all making the standards seem stricter than they really are.

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

If a character has no cause or effect, it's Aca 5. They exist outside the causality system. A certain character:

What is more fascinating, a girl that neither existed in past memory nor future possibility, someone who should have no connection, no cause or effect to this world, joined seemlessly in your world.

What more context do you need. Y'all making the standards seem stricter than they really are.

OP didn't give that context, we can't judge something we can't see.

 

[Vietthai96]

If a character has no cause or effect, it's Aca 5. They exist outside the causality system. A certain character:

What is more fascinating, a girl that neither existed in past memory nor future possibility, someone who should have no connection, no cause or effect to this world, joined seemlessly in your world.

What more context do you need. Y'all making the standards seem stricter than they really are.

We doesn't see the feat so we will not go assume it, because most of the time when people asking question they post their personal interpretation of the feat and statement rather than the scan, feat and statement itself. So we refrain from judging it, it could potentially hype up the guy who ask question in the wrong way and then disappoint him when it turn out the feat or statement in question is actually not turn out to be the same as the answers in the Q&A thread

 

[Cat275]

If a character has no cause or effect, it's Aca 5. They exist outside the causality system. A certain character:

What is more fascinating, a girl that neither existed in past memory nor future possibility, someone who should have no connection, no cause or effect to this world, joined seemlessly in your world.

What more context do you need. Y'all making the standards seem stricter than they really are.

Bet that's from madoka.

 

[Sniper670]

Alright then.

Going purely by how he interpreted it to us, that's Aca 5.

Context will be the scans following it just as he's described it to us, that's all

If he decided to describe it in a way that scans didn't say or do, that's on him if it gets rejected in a crt

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

it's not any real character nor an OC, just a hypothetical