- 40,446
- 12,914
^
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
What tier is busting a supermassive black hole?
- Thread starter The_real_cal_howard
- Start date
- 24,180
- 3,936
I don't think we use black holes for feats, since they almost never apply with real world physics. That being said, the mere gravitation pull is 4-A.
- 61,134
- 14,540
Unquantifiable, there is no such thing as destroying a black hole through sheer AP
- 40,446
- 12,914
- Thread starter
- #4
Our black hole rules and the strictness applied are honestly stupid, but I understand.
- 22
- 3
"there is no such thing as destroying a black hole through sheer AP"
But there IS a such thing as destroying entire galaxies through sheer AP. Totally makes sense! /sarcasm
But there IS a such thing as destroying entire galaxies through sheer AP. Totally makes sense! /sarcasm
- 40,446
- 12,914
- Thread starter
- #7
When every other vs debating site from OBD to Death Battle can quantify destroying black holes, it kinda does become our standards.
- 40,446
- 12,914
- Thread starter
- #9
That's only the case at the singularity.
- 4,256
- 658
How likely is it for a galaxy to have a black hole? I'm guessing it's very.Kaltias said:
So how can you bust a galaxy with a black hole in it? Do you just bust everything except it?
- 3,701
- 315
If a black hole has a set time it has to evapourate, wouldn't it be possible to calculate the amount of Hawking Radiation that comes out of it before fully evapourating and then using that amount of energy as a value of energy that you must pour into the black hole to force it to evapourate?
- 26,116
- 3,649
NO, because all the kinteic energy that would have would be absorbed if one attacks a black hole with it
- 3,701
- 315
What?
- 3,701
- 315
According to this page on Hawking Radiation...
"So, for instance, a 1-second-life black hole has a mass of 2.28×10^5 kg, equivalent to an energy of 2.05×10^22 J that could be released by 5×10^6 megatons of TNT. The initial power is 6.84×10^21 W."
"So, for instance, a 1-second-life black hole has a mass of 2.28×10^5 kg, equivalent to an energy of 2.05×10^22 J that could be released by 5×10^6 megatons of TNT. The initial power is 6.84×10^21 W."
- 267
- 146
@Cal, is there any info on how to calculate the GBE of black holes on the Black holes page?
If so, the amount of energy required to bust a supermassive black hole should basically be its GBE.
Speaking of black holes, does anyone have an approximation for how large these things get?
If so, the amount of energy required to bust a supermassive black hole should basically be its GBE.
Speaking of black holes, does anyone have an approximation for how large these things get?
- 19,117
- 6,333
The GBE of black holes can't be calced because the radius is 0.
The radius of the singularity is always 0 no matter what. The radius of the event horizon is based on the mass, which can vary from 3.8 times the mass of the Sun, to 196 billions of times.
About the Hawking Radiation thing above, the former is negative energy, so it can't be used to gauge AP
The radius of the singularity is always 0 no matter what. The radius of the event horizon is based on the mass, which can vary from 3.8 times the mass of the Sun, to 196 billions of times.
About the Hawking Radiation thing above, the former is negative energy, so it can't be used to gauge AP
