• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

what do you guys think of 1-B no game no life

9,804
3,614
Last edited:
Is there any evidence they are not? Dimensionality is spatial by default here and it's clearly referring to spatial dimensions here.
The absence of evidence that dimensions are spatial is evidence that dimensions are not spatial. there is no reference to spatial dimensions here, or there is no such thing. unless there is clear evidence that it is spatial, this is unacceptable
 
The absence of evidence that dimensions are spatial is evidence that dimensions are not spatial. there is no reference to spatial dimensions here, or there is no such thing. unless there is clear evidence that it is spatial, this is unacceptable
if u think this is unacceptable make a CRT bro
coz they are already accepted to spatial dimensions
 
The absence of evidence that dimensions are spatial is evidence that dimensions are not spatial. there is no reference to spatial dimensions here, or there is no such thing. unless there is clear evidence that it is spatial, this is unacceptable
So how is this not mentioning spatial dimensionality in context?
"What we seek is the unrealistic spirituality of two-dimensionality, combined with real life and the presence of three-dimensionality, to make something that is neither two-point-five-dimensional nor three-point-five-dimensional, nor four-dimensional, nor... Uh...?"
(then later goes on about coordinates in the same context). There's nothing else we can conclude other than spatial dimensionality. These aren't alternate dimensions.
 
if u think this is unacceptable make a CRT bro
coz they are already accepted to spatial dimensions
If it's spatial dimensions I have no problem
 
Back
Top