• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

velgrynd acausality5

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just wanted to add this, there is not a single moment where Rimuru cant be interacted both in the WN and LN, even when in the WN where Rimuru main body is located inside Imaginary Space, he still get interacted during final fight(talks with Ramiris, clashed with Velda, get BFR'ed to end of time and space,etc......). further to the afterstories Rimuru main body was literally pulled by Shion and Shuna. i don't think Type 5 is possible for Slime for now, hopefully this changes during vol 20-22
 
Also NEP type 1 is for non existent but they still exists where NEP type 2 is complete non existent it's defensive thing.
Just for correction, NEP 1 it nonexistance, and NEP 2 is nonexistance even for nonexistance. NEP 2 is nonexistance from concept of nonexistance/nothingness

So even if that NEP 1, 1000 or even infinitely deeper than bassline NEP 1, is not can to reach NEP 2 because NEP 2 is nonexistance from every level of nonexistance it self
 
I don't understand why you classify unbound = trans, they are two different things, unbound with causality doesn't meet the criteria for type 5 causality at all because there is no emphasis that not being bound there leads to transcendence, while maybe he is not bound by causality but it's just not bound by causality conventional not the boundaries causality
 
I don't know why you're so obsessed about "transcend".

Contrary to your belief, most cases of Aca 5 is simply characters being unbound or free from causal relations
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top