• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Validity of tanking Dark Nebula's galaxy-busting attack

Messages
75
Reaction score
10
So I have been wondering a while about the galaxy-busting feat that Kirby survives

https://fat.gfycat.com/GrotesqueDefinitiveGreatwhiteshark.gif

Outside this board, I've come across quite some scepticism towards this, the main points being:

1) Kirby seems totally unaffected by it despite the backdrop changing.

2) Even after Dark Nebula changes the background, there are still lingering stars in the background.

3) There were no actual galaxies destroyed, the background was only changed due to scenery (cinematics) or to bring home that you're fighting a boss monster. They usually bring up other games as example in which a character undergoes a super mode which leads to the background changing from (for example) a serene grassfield to a blazing battlefield with lava.

I was wondering what the emphasized arguments are that the galaxy in the background was legit and that there is substantial proof or evidence to argue in Kirby and Dark Nebula's favour.
 
To be fair, the scene in general is MSS and not Galaxy, but I digress.

For the first point, that means that Kirby is just that tough. Not really much more to say. It's like saying since Amethyst's attacks did nothing to Jasper, then clearly they're not island level.

Second point. It takes years for the light of stars to go out once they're destroyed. Not to mention that even if he didn't destroy those stars, still doesn't de-validate the nebula bust. Like Broly and his galaxy bust.

Third point isn't really one. Someone back in the day tried to point out "lol it's an illusion" and that's when people started to side on the OP's side. Dark Nebula has no shown powers that would prove that he could teleport or create illusions. I would like to see the examples people used.

I do have a respect blog with information about said feat under the featured tab, so you can check that out, but there's more evidence for it than against it.
 
I think that Howard makes sense.
 
Well, LordXcano considered it as a nebula, rather than as a galaxy, which is an interpretation that needs community approval from the staff.
 
Xcano's blog isn't downgrading Kirby because the average nebula is still large enough to warrant a Multi-Solar System rating, which he and Ant mentioned here. Whether Cal or Xcano's interpretation of the scene is accepted the Tier stays the same.
 
Back
Top