• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Valiant Comics: Rebirth

Also technically wouldn't this make Mambo a smurf via Energy Manip?
 
Yes, that's another thing I wanted to discuss. Would it grant her a 2C or no?
 
I'm unsure, she is summoning their energies, and I guess nothing says she couldn't not do it in combat? It's really weird, especially since those energies are ultimately used for hax. It might just be useless 4D hax.
 
Was asked on Discord if this was 2-C, and yes it should be. Kira was also asked (by me) and she also thought it was 2-C (and she's a huge nerd) so it's probably correct. She also mentioned its similar to DMC's scaling which should adhere to its validity. All in all this should be a valid feat and scale.
 
Noice.

Although I wonder if this scales to Shadowman too since he is also helping. Hmmm
 
Well, if several deities were involved, and given that it is a low-level 2-C feat, I suppose that "likely 2-C" should probably be fine.
 
Speed justification will have to be changed since Sharpshooter's feat isn't legit, looks good for the rest


Also I wouldn't give tier 2 to Shadowman personally
 
Please try to be more careful to use correct grammar though. Shouldn't it be "Shadowmen" rather than "Shadowmans"?
 
The thing is, it's a name. And usually, we just add an S at the en of them - at least what my teacher used to say lol
 
Well, usually. But this is a name. Similar to "Goodmans" or another name. We don't use Goodmen for those named Goodman (it's quite a common surname)
 
Yes, but it is comprised of two existing words with specifically defined plurals, so I would much prefer if you use that instead of personal speculation.
 
Eh but whatever. I will change it to "A Shadowman is naturally blah blah blah" since i don't agree with the shadowmen part.
 
Back
Top