@Super Saiyan 3 Gohan:
CASE 1
"No really, I have found the vast majority of this attitude tends to come from Americans who restrict everything to manga, nothing else, either because they worship the manga or they hate DBZ so much (like you, apparently) that they want to use it to defang DBZ. The Japanese don't care about canon status. Look it up. It's TRUE. So, pick a side: Do you wanna go with the American version, which means that you adhere to our rigid view of canon status, or the Japanese?"
Fallacy: Appeal to tradition; "American version", "the Japanese" way
LOL, I don't give a **** about either "American version" or "the Japanese" way? What the **** are those terms supposed to mean anyway? Are you implying a person's thought process depends on what country they live in?
I'm going by the simple definition in which I'll choose the ORIGINAL appearance of a character as canon. Goku
originally appeared in a manga, hence only his manga feats are to be accepted, apart from events the author specifically states as canon material (like Battle of Gods). If you wish to use anime version of Goku, or any other adapted version, go right ahead. I never asked you not to, simply to differentiate the anime version from the manga one. The Sherlock Holmes in Arthur Conan Doyle's books will be the canon version, not the Movie or the TV series character. That's exactly why we have two pages for Azathoth, dumbass. One for the Cthulhu Mythos version and the other for the Demonbane version, despite both of them being the same character.
CASE 2
"If you go with ours, then you've sealed your fate. Because here is the EXACT screenshot from the manga.
[Your Image]
It clearly states in only a few years that Buu had destroyed entire galaxies. At the very minimum, he should be galaxy buster, not a casual galaxy buster, but a galaxy buster nonetheless, even if it's a small galaxy, because it's fact that there is only four galaxies left in the DBZ universe, and that's because Buu destroyed them. Being a large star buster still means he can destroy large segments of the universe, but that would take thousands if not millions of years, and even a small galaxy buster would take a while, which isn't consistent with what is written in the manga."
^ LOL, that's obviously an scanlation. Fan-made bullshit, to put it simply. But hey, since we're discussing scanlations
Same page on ********
Same page on MangaTow
Damn man, even the scanlations disagree with you. Both state "hundreds of planets" quite clearly. Stop twisting the canon material into something completely different. Hell, there was even a debate on the very same topic, about the very same page.
Real vs Fake
Just accept it, dude. Dragon Ball characters are Star System at best. All your so-called "evidence" cannot overcome the crushing truth about featless claims and
inane powerscaling.
CASE 3
"And you can't flip flop between Japanese and American; how would you, a Superman fanatic, like it if I chose to reject Superman's 200-quintillion ton lift and yet I DID accept Superman being hurt by Lex Luthor's Scientific Spirit Bomb. You wouldn't like that, would you? Make up your damn mind."
Fallacy: Red Herring; Superman is totally and completely irrelevant to this thread
I must admit, this is a classic example of Red Herring. Superman has no relation to this thread, yet you deliberately bring him up just to change the actual point of this thread: Should Dragon Ball charcters be upgraded or not?
You bring up the topic of Superman in a poor attempt at provoking me for who knows what reason. By this point, I think you could be considered a troll by some people for
deliberately provoking another member of the community using a classic bait technique in order to deviate from the actual topic, in which said member disagreed with you.
CASE 4
"Then by that logic Superman shouldn't be considered lightspeed either since we never technically see him reach lightspeed because it's in a comic strip not designed for scientific accuracy, the same as DBZ! Even the cartoons don't and can't ever show him going lightspeed! And you can't then say that he is because other characters claim that he is; by that same logic, Raditz was lightspeed and Goku and Frieza were moving beyond lightspeed (remember, King Kai easily tracked Goku's faster-than-light ship yet he had a hard time following Goku and Frieza). Don't deny for our side what you allow for your side when the argument is very similar. You know what the truth is? You are never going to be convinced that they are moving beyond lightspeed not because of the facts, but because you don't WANT to believe it. It's that simple."
Fallacy: Circular Reasoning; because Superman was never shown to be FTL, yet is considered to be, the same applies for Dragon Ball characters as well
This argument of yours is also a classic case of circular reasoning, as well as incorrect. I won't bother to debate it with you, but Superman
has been shown to reach FTL speed (especially Pre-Crisis Superman) multiple times. None of the Dragon Ball characters have been shown to be faster than light, though.
Simply because Superman is considered FTL, Dragon Ball characters should be as well? Like I said, a classic case of Circular Reasoning Fallacy. Hmm...you definitely seem as if you're trolling a bit...anyways, moving on...
CASE 5
"I can accept that Cell's statement could, from a certain point of view, be considered hyperbole (though if you also believe Superman is moving at lightspeed, then you're a hypocrite because we only have the statements of other characters and himself to prove it, not actual fact because you can NEVER literally SHOW someone moving or fighting at lightspeed like you seem to think they should), but what is NOT hyperbole is that Buu destroyed every galaxy in the entire DBZ universe but four of them. THAT is FACT, and he should be at least a small galaxy buster, though my personal belief is that he's a multi-galaxy buster."
Fallacies
a) Argument of ignorance; But Buu destroyed a galaxy in the anime!
Well, Buu was never shown to have destroyed a galaxy in the manga and your claims of canonicity are irrelevant compared to the standard online system, so the anime
will be ignored by me. Additionally, your manga scan is an inaccurately translated page of fanfiction.
b) Non-Sequitur; Since there are only four galaxies in the Dragon Ball universe, the rest of them must have been destroyed by Buu
Do I need to elaborate on this? You conclusion of Buu having destroyed every galaxy except four is not implied at all by the premise of the Dragon Ball universe having only four galaxies.
c) Red Herring; Superman is totally and completely irrelevant to this thread
Yet again, the mention of Superman is entirely unnecessary apart from trying to provoke me (again).
d) Argument from belief; personal belief that Buu is multi-galaxy buster
Yes, you are absolutely free to exercise your personal beliefs on
FanFictio , not a wiki where powers and stats are based on feats and not
beliefs.
You know, I'm seriously doubting if you are a troll...
CASE 6
"Not controversial. Mercilessly picked on and ridiculed and belittled and bullied. THAT is the truth. The admins and the mods here flat-out hate Dragon Ball Z. And it's motivated by troll hatred; to try and defang and remove DBZ as potential competition to DC Comics and how strong the characters there can get. It's an insidious movement because rather than just try and accept how strong these characters are head-on and let their hero win legitimately they try and stack the deck to ensure that they absolutely never stand a chance. It's infantile and pathetic. Antvasima thinks DBZ should be upgraded, and he doesn't even like the series! This site is anything but fair and impartial, it's blatantly biased, period. And you're fooling yourself if you think you're any different. I can tell from your tone you don't even like DBZ. Have you ever even WATCHED it or READ the manga? And I mean RECENTLY too. Because if you haven't, then you have no business debating something I know so well and watch so much, because I know it far better than you ever will."
Fallacy: Ad Hominem; argument against member (and wiki), not the point
Yet
another classic example of an age-old fallacy. Instead of trying to prove your point, you instead try to discredit the entire wiki, admins, members as well as myself for not agreeing with your
personal opinion of whether Dragon Ball characters should be upgraded or not.
As for Antvasima, even though I personally disagree with him regarding the Dragon Ball characters' power levels, I respect him for trying to maintain a neutral stance as an admin, something it seems you are evidently incapable of.
Why it seems so? Well, when I disagreed with you, you proclaimed (and here i quote verbatim): "I can tell from your tone you don't even like DBZ. Have you ever even WATCHED it or READ the manga? And I mean RECENTLY too."
Well, you have already formed a biased opinion of me. Please go to my wiki profile page
here and it states on the SECOND line that I'm a long time supporter of Dragon Ball. It seems like your "telling from tone" skills need some
real polishing buddy.
Oh, and just in case you doubt it, please check the page history as well. So far there has been only one edit (changed from the default page, that is) on Feb 15, 2015, so you cannot claim that I edited my profile when I posted this.
I really think I should report you to the Admins for attacking me personally over a difference of opinion when I did absolutely nothing to provoke you, but I'll let it slide for now.