Unaccurate wiki pages

[Wild_Blood_13]

I realize many if not all of the character pages are eather exhagurated or underpowered i feel like this needs to be fixed

 

[Jinx666]

What pages?

 

[Wild_Blood_13]

What pages?

for example Alexandrite's page "Massively Hypersonic" on the speed page it says she can go: (Mach 1000-8810.2)

 

[Wild_Blood_13]

and thats just a rediculous over exhaduration

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Massively Hypersonic is Mach 100 to Mach 1000, and she is superior to Garnet who was calced to be Mach 582.

 

[Wild_Blood_13]

Massively Hypersonic is Mach 100 to Mach 1000, and she is superior to Garnet who was calced to be Mach 582

yeah and thats extremely fast shes only about a little faster than a athlete (garnet that is) so alexandrite is a little faster than a bus

 

[Wild_Blood_13]

ill respond tommorow its night time where i am

 

[WeeklyBattles]

In long-distance running the Gems are probably Subsonic at best, but their burst speed, combat speed, and reactions are massively hypersonic, which is what is listed on their profiles.

 

[Reppuzan]

@Wild Blood

First, I'll have to ask you to speak with better grammar. It's difficult to understand what you're saying.

Second, you can't just say, "we need to fix all of these profiles because they're clearly overpowered or underpowered". Not only is that vague, but you're generalizing over 9000+ profiles. I only have sparse knowledge of Steven Universe, but you're going to have to do more than assert if you want to start making changes left and right.

Third, we can't rate characters by the way you "think" they should be rated. This a site that runs on evidence. While some pages fall through the gaps, it's inherent in our code to back up all of our statements with rock-solid proof. You should also know that authors often do not know how strong they're making their characters, so just because you think something should happen or if it goes against the author's initial vision/view of a character is not substantial enough for a change.

 

[Wild_Blood_13]

@Wild Blood
First, I'll have to ask you to speak with better grammar. It's difficult to understand what you're saying.

Second, you can't just say, "we need to fix all of these profiles because they're clearly overpowered or underpowered". Not only is that vague, but you're generalizing over 9000+ profiles. I only have sparse knowledge of Steven Universe, but you're going to have to do more than assert if you want to start making changes left and right.

Third, we can't rate characters by the way you "think" they should be rated. This a site that runs on evidence. While some pages fall through the gaps, it's inherent in our code to back up all of our statements with rock-solid proof. You should also know that authors often do not know how strong they're making their characters, so just because you think something should happen or if it goes against the author's initial vision/view of a character is not substantial enough for a change.

sorry my keyboard i broken. alright but it seems to have been affecting battle outcomes such as one punch man losing to alexandrite which even tho i love steven universe he would win by a long shot so i suppose i just wish for better specification and i think speed and reaction speed should be seperat

 

[Amelia_Lonelyheart]

As Weekly says, Garnets MHS rating comes from her moving her arm in tune with lightning. That's only really for combat speed, though. Their best movement speed feats are around Subsonic (Steven and Garnet both ran so fast they became a blur).

Hence why the majority of the SU cast is MHS. Also, I'm pretty sure the Alexandrite vs Saitama thread had speed equalized, otherwise he would blitz her.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Dark Yes the match had equalized speed.

 

[Wild_Blood_13]

ok than thanks for explaining