• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Town level Pikachu

Status
Not open for further replies.

The_real_cal_howard

Read my comic
VS Battles
Retired
40,470
12,953
Lina calced Pikachu's Z-Move Catastropika to be Town level a little while back. This applies to game Pikachu and should apply to composite Pikachu too.
 
Personally, I feel like it should apply to durability too, given that Pikachu could survive in the epicenter of said attack. Though I am firmly against it being natural AP.
 
That wouldn't make since due to the fact that Pikachu is already Mutli-City Block level.
 
Actually, Lina re-redid it. He put Large Buldimf+ and switched it to Twon after another revelation.
 
I already said that it would only scale to game Pikachu via Z-Move, not durability, and not Ash's Pikachu, since via scaling it has better feats.
 
Ash's Pikachu being Mountain level? Wew

Anyways, as I noted on the calc, this only scales to Pikachu's AP only with the Z-move, thus Pikachu's AP should be read as

  • Multi-City Block level normally (or whatever Pikchu's AP is), Town level with Z-move.
 
We will go with what is said on the Pokedex's entry for Pikachu then (about Pikachu releasing 5 Gigajoules of energy).
 
TBH, I'm personally very against how we rate normal pokemons is to our trainer profiles, because I guarantee that this won't be able to be put on Pikachu's profile due to "lol it's Ash's" despite the fact that we have always had composites.
 
And?


Your point?


So any f*cking pokemon can scale to a trained one?

Please Cal, stop with that matter, because it has been discussed already.
 
@Cal Remember I tried that already. I believe everyone including you disagreed with it. I may be wrong though.
 
Composite is for legendaries only


All other profiles are from one media (And if they feats from diferent one, those should be clarify)


But all this is base on wild pokemon, NOT TRAINED ONES.
 
Honestly the way we rate Pokemon gives me a headache, which is why I rarely contribute to the Pokemon discussions anymore.

Anyway I updated the calc with Cano's suggestion for Kinetic Energy of the fragments and got Megaton grade results. I have no idea if I counted the frames correctly though.
 
Yeah. It has been discussed. And the current authority (me) disagreed with it. If a Salamence performs some city level feat, but it belongs to Drake, Salamence's profile is unknown because it belongs to someone else. Hell, Dragonite should be currently unknown because it's only feats come from Lance's. Does anyone know the meaning of the word Composite, or is it exclusive to Digimon nowadays.

Composites are not for legendaries only. They have never been. They never will be. Only reason this topic exists is because we wanted to make profiles for trainers.
 
I mostly agree with Cal regarding this as well. It just makes matters so much less complicated
 
If you want to get Pokémon profiles banned again, do whatever you please


I hope you are happy with that decision
 
Should I upgrade everything to 7-A with MHS speed now or should I wait? Im not being sarcastic, this is literally the end result of this, no calc will ever need to be done again, heck even the one were using to upgrade him now is worthless, because we have all that we need, Tyranitar and Magnemite.
 
Don't go there. Because Pokemon profiles were banned in the first place because of stat scaling. Not dismissing feats because of ownership, which in itself would get the trainer profiles banned if anything.
 
Not, but pretty sure your reasoning towards scaling would get them banned too.


Because it all sound like if I made a Caterpie beat a Tyranitar and made all Bug Catchers from BoG At least 7-A. #100%Logic
 
Stop taking my words out of context/taking them to an extreme. I never stated a single thing about scaling. Heck. For the most part, we don't scale to this verse at all. With your logic, if Youngster Joey beat a Tyranitar, then he and his entire team becomes at least 7-A. Top percentage of Rattata indeed.

Imo, how we currently rate Pokemon should get the profiles deleted. They're obsolete if the trainers get the scaling and the moves and etc.
 
Caterpie beating a Tyranitar would be a massive outlier or PIS or both.

And please do not be condensing to other people for having different opinions on how Pokemon should be, or how anything should be scaled, for that matter.
 
The real cal howard said:
Stop taking my words out of context/taking them to an extreme. I never stated a single thing about scaling. Heck. For the most part, we don't scale to this verse at all. With your logic, if Youngster Joey beat a Tyranitar, then he and his entire team becomes at least 7-A. Top percentage of Rattata indeed.
Imo, how we currently rate Pokemon should get the profiles deleted. They're obsolete if the trainers get the scaling and the moves and etc.
Yeah, a correct and logical scaling, organized


I don't even know how you even see this as complex
 
I don't see it as complex. Just inaccurate. Because building level composite Pikachu despite having feats of town, small town, and MCB, is quite silly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top