• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Top 5 Strongest Characters for Every Tier 36

Status
Not open for further replies.
1-A isn't out of any formalism, while High 1-A and NEP type 2 are by very definition. Ergo 1-A would allow you to affect AE and NEP type 1 and High 1-A would allow you to affect NEP type 2 because it's a large cardinal. Your welcome VS Battles Wiki.
 
@00potato That's literally how the ability works, the statement of reducing things to particles comes after he destroyed Nightengale's Critter, which btw was stated to be reduced to white particles.



You can literally watch it yourself from 19:30-21:04.
 
I don't really understand the limit of NEP2 so 1-A power can affect them?
Maybe I have heard some stuff about outerversal abilities affecting them. I also made a list of possible powers that may or may not work on NEP Type 2
 
Also going back to fiction being fiction, would the contradiction argument work on NEP Type 2, Concept manipulation something without a concept like NEP Type 2.
 
It seems like he is breaking it up into particles... but that also means that they must have a body to break up. (Makes sense considering Wil O Wisps description.)
I guess deconstruction still works, even if atomization is still kinda iffy. More of a debate on wording if anything.
(19:52)
 
Also, it's kinda NLF to say "1-A or higher tiers can affect type 2 NEP without feats"
Not as much as talking about high 1-B not being able to do it since NEP2 have nothing to do about the dimmension, apparently some cardinal dimmension can help to affect it but well it's why i asked what is the limit with argument not just their are 1-A so they can (when 1-A tier itself is not really anymore a privileged tier), if you talked about type1 concept being able okay, but the 1-A so they can without reasoning...
 
Stop saying stuff is NLF when it isn't NLF but just wrong without justification.

Also 1-A characters lack spatio temporality which is the main basis you use to determine if something is abstract or physically nonexistent in the first place. A 1-A should be able to affect a character with AE type 1 and NEP type 1.
 
Do you mean Nonexistentent Type 2 is wrong or the idea that its NFL is wrong?
I mean that both the idea that a 1-A could affect an NEP type 2 with no argument and the idea that the aforementioned concept is NLF are wrong.
 
I dont think there's a universal consensus on how NEP Type 2 works

everyone seems to have a different definition on what they think should or should not be able to affect it and some just completely avoid NEP Type 2.
 
I dont think there's a universal consensus on how NEP Type 2 works

everyone seems to have a different definition on what they think should or should not be able to affect it and some just completely avoid NEP Type 2.
That's because NEP type 2 is poorly defined by nature of VBW's concept boner sophistry
 
There is, tier and hax don't touch it without feats, anyone who said the reverse is simply wrong.
I suppose well even then I'm not too sure. I've seen some knowledgeable members be against it. Whether it's because it's considered NFL, or Since in fiction anything can happen like affecting a NEP Type 2 being.

Whatever the arguments not everyone agrees with it.
For now, I'll simply follow the majority consensus and what the wiki decides to do with the NEP page.
 
NEP type 1 can bea easily dealt by having conceptual manipulation type 2 or 1

NEP type 2 u need prove of being able to affect them
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top