- 5,030
- 2,689
Character X transcend the time-space of his Universe and after that transcend the timeline (which exist in a higher time-space than his Universe) would that be 4-D or 5-D?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Timeline - Short Question
- Thread starter Zaratthustra
- Start date
- 5,554
- 2,332
If they exist in a higher dimension than a universal structure they would be 5D, yes. Although technically it should be 4D and type 4 acasualty that's not how it's treated it on this site.
- 5,030
- 2,689
- Thread starter
- #3
Not in a higher dimension, but in a higher time-space.
- 5,554
- 2,332
So a higher temporal and spatial dimension. Which would be rated as 5D here.
- 11,205
- 1,729
4-D, and Immeasurable speed.
- 5,554
- 2,332
Maybe type 4 acausality as well.
- 5,030
- 2,689
- Thread starter
- #7
The most important for me right now is to know if it's 4-D or 5-D this type of transcending.
It was already debated that its type 4 Acausality - The character is no longer bound by the River of Time, exist outside of it. Thanks for your opinion.
It was already debated that its type 4 Acausality - The character is no longer bound by the River of Time, exist outside of it. Thanks for your opinion.
- 11,205
- 1,729
4-D.
- 5,554
- 2,332
Well because the way this site treats 4D and 5D is very weird, transcending a universal structure (aka 4D, 3 spatial and 1 temporal) you get High 2-A or 5D.
- 5,030
- 2,689
- Thread starter
- #10
Ugh, so confused when there are two sides.
- 5,554
- 2,332
I mean he's right in the sense that it is technically 4 spatial dimensions like I said above. But because of the way this site treats these things in the dimensional tiering he would be qualified for 5D or High 2-A.
- 11,205
- 1,729
Temporal dimensions shouldn't count towards attacking power.
- 5,030
- 2,689
- Thread starter
- #13
It's not for attacking, it's just for those characters whose existence are comparable to it being 4-D or 5-D.
They don't have that output of High 2-A.
They don't have that output of High 2-A.
- 2,740
- 850
Pretty sure brane cosmology would make that still 4D iirc
- 5,554
- 2,332
They shouldn't but Low 2-C is literally just that. But I'm not planning on revising the whole wiki's standard of dimensional tiering.The God Of Procrastination said:
- 2,740
- 850
S╠Âo╠Âr╠Âr╠Ây╠ ╠Âb╠Âu╠Ât╠ ╠Âi╠Âf╠ ╠Ây╠Âo╠Âu╠ ╠Âw╠Âa╠Ân╠Ân╠Âa╠ ╠Ât╠Âa╠Âl╠Âk╠ ╠Ât╠Âr╠Âa╠Âs╠Âh╠ ╠Âa╠Âb╠Âo╠Âu╠Ât╠ ╠Âo╠Âu╠Âr╠ ╠Ât╠Âi╠Âe╠Âr╠Âi╠Ân╠Âg╠ ╠Âs╠Ây╠Âs╠Ât╠Âe╠Âm╠ ╠Ây╠Âo╠Âu╠ ╠Âe╠Âi╠Ât╠Âh╠Âe╠Âr╠ ╠Âr╠Âe╠Âv╠Âi╠Âs╠Âe╠ ╠Âi╠Ât╠Â,╠ ╠Âg╠Âe╠Ât╠ ╠Âb╠Âa╠Ân╠Ân╠Âe╠Âd╠ ╠Âo╠Âr╠ ╠Âb╠Âe╠Âa╠Ât╠ ╠Âm╠Âe╠ ╠Âi╠Ân╠ ╠Âm╠Âi╠Ân╠Âe╠Âc╠Âr╠Âa╠Âf╠Ât╠ ╠Âs╠Âp╠Âl╠Âe╠Âe╠Âf╠Â!╠Â
- 5,554
- 2,332
- 2,740
- 850
W╠Âh╠Âa╠Ât╠Âs╠ ╠Ât╠Âh╠Âe╠ ╠Âm╠Âa╠Ât╠Ât╠Âe╠Âr╠Â?╠ ╠ÂS╠Âc╠Âa╠Âr╠Âe╠Âd╠Â?╠ ╠ÂB╠Âe╠Âc╠Âa╠Âu╠Âs╠Âe╠ ╠Ây╠Âo╠Âu╠ ╠Âk╠Ân╠Âo╠Âw╠ ╠Âc╠Âh╠Âa╠Âr╠Âa╠Âc╠Ât╠Âe╠Âr╠ ╠Âl╠Âi╠Âm╠Âi╠Ât╠Âs╠ ╠Âa╠Âr╠Âe╠ ╠Âm╠Ây╠ ╠Âm╠Âa╠Âi╠Ân╠ ╠Âw╠Âe╠Âa╠Âk╠Ân╠Âe╠Âs╠Âs╠Â?╠Â
- 5,554
- 2,332
- 5,030
- 2,689
- Thread starter
- #20
So, what do you say is the final verdict?
- 5,554
- 2,332
According to the standard it's High 2-A.
- 2,740
- 850
I mean... the dragon ball universes are considered space times within a timeline with said timeline only being 2-C if destroyed.
- 5,554
- 2,332
Yeah destroying it is Low 2-C but transcending it is High 2-A.
- 2,740
- 850
Im not sure tbh. Dimensional tiering doesnt make much sense to me in the first place. Especially when trying to apply it to fiction.
- 5,030
- 2,689
- Thread starter
- #25
So 5-D being with Low 2-C ap right?
- 5,554
- 2,332
What?
- 5,030
- 2,689
- Thread starter
- #27
In the novel, the characters transcend all natural laws and the time-space and then later the timeline are doing this within their home universe - they have feats that cap them at Universal+(Low 2-C). No higher feats. They can go to other Universes but can't survive out within the Void of the Multiverse.
- 5,554
- 2,332
That would be Low 2-C then yeah.
- 5,030
- 2,689
- Thread starter
- #29
I'm sorry for asking this again but I got so many opinions on it being 4-D while other 5-D - I just want to be sure so I don't create confusion, as If I the one who makes the profile can't make it good enough (understandable) then what can I say when someone asks me about the verse/character.
In the end, would it be 4-D being with Low 2-C or 5-D being with Low 2-C? I ask this as the Multiverse is stated to transcend even them meaning either 5-D or 6-D depending on what their state of being will be decided.
In the end, would it be 4-D being with Low 2-C or 5-D being with Low 2-C? I ask this as the Multiverse is stated to transcend even them meaning either 5-D or 6-D depending on what their state of being will be decided.
- 5,554
- 2,332
Look if the universe is like a bubble and there is another bubble encompassing it existing in a higher form of existence it would be 5D. But if it's just destroying a universe it would be 4D. And if you're asking about transcending the multiverse it would definitely be 5D.
What you described in the last post sounds like Low 2-C.
What you described in the last post sounds like Low 2-C.
- 5,030
- 2,689
- Thread starter
- #31
I see thanks for the response.
Similar threads
