• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Tiger vs Lion: This debate is wack

So I think we are in agreement that at bare minimum both are comparable when in the same weight range. So let's look at some of the options we have:
A. Remove mentions of the other species on both profiles, we can rather safely claim Tigers and Lions are stronger then the other 5 big cat. If we feel that part of their rating justification needs to be replaced. It might obvious but it supports the point we are making so we might as well point it out.

B. Say Lions and Tigers at comparable to each other without specifying whether one of them is stronger we would however need a source to say that without suggesting one is stronger than the other.

C. Keep the profiles as is. I mean more points have been brought up in favor of tigers being stronger than the opposite.

D. Lions are stronger and the profiles should say that. I don't think this option has been brought up previously this is just for the due diligence.
 
Back
Top