Tiering System: Low 2-C to 2-A standards

[DontTalkDT]

If you want to include cases where the universes are not together in some bigger space, then I guess. I always assumed that we are usually going with the assumption that universes lie together within the bigger 5-D space.


Well, I am pretty neutral regarding the issue to begin with, so I will leave these explanations to you.

 

[Antvasima]

We do go with the assumption that the 4-D universes are lined up as branes along a 5-D axis, yes. Does that complicate Kepekley's suggestion?

 

[Kepekley23]

Not exactly. It can actually be integrated into my argument as an additional example.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.

 

[Antvasima]

We still need to decide on how to concisely word and where to clarify these new standards though.

 

[Kepekley23]

It would likely just need to be the sixth note in the page. In which case, give me a minute or two.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay, but I am going to bed now. It will have to wait until tomorrow.

 

[Kepekley23]

No hurries.

 

[Antvasima]

Feel free to write up a suggestion.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

I think the following bug is fixed, so what is currently being discussed here?

 

[Antvasima]

Kepekley plans to write a draft for a clarifying note at the bottom of the Tiering System page.

 

[Antvasima]

We need to reach some sort of practical conclusion here. Can somebody please politely remind Kepekley about this thread?

 

[Assaltwaffle]

I'll leave a message on his wall. This may have been one of the threads that got in-followed for him.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes. Thank you.

 

[Kepekley23]

I believe we don't need to write an overtly long note, just one that gets the point across. In which case:

"Note 6: Due to the fact that the distance between any given number of universes is currently unknowable, it's impossible to quantify the numerical gap between each one of the subtiers in Tier 2. As such, it's not allowed to upgrade a character based solely on multipliers. For example, someone twice as strong as a Low 2-C character would still be Low 2-C, and someone infinitely more powerful than a 2-C would not be 2-A."

How does this look?

 

[Aeyu]

I think that any mention of a 5-D axis just makes it confusing, even if that is the assumption. But I do like Kep's rewording. However, is it meant to say a character twice as strong as Low 2-C is 2-C? Was that decided while I was away?

 

[RRTheEndMan]

someone twice as strong as a Low 2-C character would still be 2-C

I know I'm no Elite, but I think you meant Low 2-C

 

[Kepekley23]

Sorry. Pretty tired today.

 

[Aeyu]

No problem, I was just confused lol

 

[Antvasima]

I think that note seems good and to get the point across. What do the rest of the staff think?

 

[Assaltwaffle]

I like it.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I like Kep's wording as well.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I am fine with adding the footnote then.

 

[Antvasima]

I have made the addition: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/index.php?title=Tiering_System&diff=2640199&oldid=2561340

 

[AKM sama]

Now can I ask which profiles are getting affected by this?

 

[Dark649]

For now i heard Thanos [Other Marvel char.] and Gurren Lagaan.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

Under this note... would a low 2-C infinitely above baseline still lose to a 2-B

 

[Antvasima]

I do not know. Sorry.