- 52
- 27
I don't think tier 11 should stay the tier that it is, largely due to 11-B. There are literally only 6 characters being 11-B, and that is including this one which will be deleted. Like think about it. Authors have a reason to write a 11-A characters via living on paper or something of that nature. Authors have a reason to write 11-C characters by virtue of just writing an ultra-weak character or one that is viewed as fictional. In both cases for 11-C and even 11-A, there are plausible reasons for why an array of authors would consider writing such characters
But especially now with the new revisions, making qualitative inferiorities automatically 11-C (a concept which I do agree with) instead of 11-A or 11-B, a 1-D character would only be written in the absolute most niche circumstances, and this is reflected with how many 11-B characters there are and who is comprised in that tier.
I think one of three adjustments should happen:
1: 11-C is changed to solely include qualitative inferiorities. 11-B is 1-dimensional or 0-dimensional characters (or any form of lower being that is implied to still "exist" in the base universe), and 11-A maintains its current definition.
2: 11-C is changed to be 2 levels or lower of qualitative inferiority, being a sort of "fiction within fiction." 11-B is 1 level of qualitative inferiority, and 11-A is all levels of lower dimensionality, being 2D, 1D, 0D, or any form of lower being that is implied to still "exist" in the base universe.
3: 11-C is changed to be the mirror version of High 1-A and is changed to "meta" qualitative inferiorities only. 11-B is changed to include qualitative inferiorities of any depth of layers. 11-A is comprising of the lower dimensions, being 2D, 1D, 0D, or any form of lower being that is implied to still "exist" in the base universe.
Out of these three options, I personally like option 3 the most. It would regulate the least amount of characters to 11-C I'm sure, but I don't necessarily see this as a negative. Just as tier 0 is seen as the sort of pinnacle of power and the expectation that comes along with this, being that not many characters qualify for the tier, 11-C would be the inverse of that, being that it is the pinnacle of weakness, and the same expectation that not many characters would qualify for it.
But especially now with the new revisions, making qualitative inferiorities automatically 11-C (a concept which I do agree with) instead of 11-A or 11-B, a 1-D character would only be written in the absolute most niche circumstances, and this is reflected with how many 11-B characters there are and who is comprised in that tier.
I think one of three adjustments should happen:
1: 11-C is changed to solely include qualitative inferiorities. 11-B is 1-dimensional or 0-dimensional characters (or any form of lower being that is implied to still "exist" in the base universe), and 11-A maintains its current definition.
2: 11-C is changed to be 2 levels or lower of qualitative inferiority, being a sort of "fiction within fiction." 11-B is 1 level of qualitative inferiority, and 11-A is all levels of lower dimensionality, being 2D, 1D, 0D, or any form of lower being that is implied to still "exist" in the base universe.
3: 11-C is changed to be the mirror version of High 1-A and is changed to "meta" qualitative inferiorities only. 11-B is changed to include qualitative inferiorities of any depth of layers. 11-A is comprising of the lower dimensions, being 2D, 1D, 0D, or any form of lower being that is implied to still "exist" in the base universe.
Out of these three options, I personally like option 3 the most. It would regulate the least amount of characters to 11-C I'm sure, but I don't necessarily see this as a negative. Just as tier 0 is seen as the sort of pinnacle of power and the expectation that comes along with this, being that not many characters qualify for the tier, 11-C would be the inverse of that, being that it is the pinnacle of weakness, and the same expectation that not many characters would qualify for it.