Doesn't really change much though, it's also stated beyond the Source Wall lies the Source.
A thread ban needs to be done on Tier 1-A CRTs on DC till the revisions.
I never disagreed with the Source existing beyond the Source Wall though. This is not a relevant point, as the argument is that the Source doesn't scale to the Overvoid.
The Overvoid is not Omnipresent.
That's not a valid interpretation. This is what the scan said-
It's not that Snyder doesn't consider physics-based dimensions to exist, he just considers them separate from his 6 dimensions.
That's some writer not Grant morrison.
After reading several threads, i agree for it to be split.
Grant map put them on the same level of existence unless you give me a reason why it shouldn't scale then it scales. Besides they have been used interchangeably
I never said Overvoid is but it should be omnipresent or nigh as it encompasses the Omniverse as all of existence is in it's being.
Cause it's where perpetua was sealed at that point the story was talking about her.
Proof?
I’m confused. Is Grant Morrison supposed to be different from other writers or something?
So existing beyond the Overvoid puts you on the same level of existence? The Overvoid contains all other Multiverses of the Omniverse has well, existing in one of them doesn't scale you to the Overvoid. In fact, the Source Wall itself exists in the Overvoid.
The Overvoid cannot be the Source if both of them have different properties, so both have to be Omnipresent. Nigh-Omnipresence does not equate to Omnipresence, and encompassing the Omniverse does not equate to being present inside them.
How is it relevant where Perpetua was sealed? It explicitly said the Source was at the centre of the Omniverse. If a Batman comic says the Overvoid exists beyond the Multiverse, would you equate that with Gotham City existing beyond the Multiverse?
So now author statements matter? Great. Grant said the Source is the Overvoid.
I never said that Snyder didn't consider physics-based dimensions to exist in his cosmology. Morrison's main dimensions are length, width, depth and time and imagination. However, he treats the Fifth Dimension as a mathematical dimension.
You missed my point. I am not saying author statements don't matter, my point is that they shouldn't be used if they are contradicted.
Grants statements are not contradicted by the comics.
You missed my point. What I am trying to say is that Snyder's Cosmology (except 5D), doesn't contradict Grant's, but instead adds onto it. Morrison's stuff other than 5D still exists, but seperately from those, Snyder's 6 dimensions exist.
Rebirth disagrees
A company wide reboot does not mean that Grant made a contradictory statement about Multiversity.
No, bruh. What I meant was that Rebirth's Comics(Snyder's) retconned Grant.
Yes.
Yes, the same group of members seem to keep spamming very ill-considered cosmic DC Comics upgrade and downgrade threads at the moment, and then quickly all join in the arguments, which is pointless and wastes a lot of time for no good reason whatsoever other than stonewalling clear logical rebuttals and forcing me to close them.
No, the first five dimensions of Snyder's cosmology contradict Morrison's dimensions because they are simply not the same as Morrison's.
I think so. Firestorm Elizio and I don't agree with the reasoning, and this group is clearly just trying to pick constant fights.
Yes, agreed. It seems intended to relentlessly waste time, create disturbances for our soon-to-be-released revision thread, and possibly try to frame me in a negative light (for future usefulness) for closing them after the arguments have been logically properly rebutted and the relentless usual stonewalling and going in circles repetition process has begun.
Okay. I will do so then.
