- 10,875
- 9,629
Here we go again. Told you I had something planned.
In Chapter 168 of OPM, we are given the finale of the fight of Saitama VS Cosmic Garou, where we see the true extent of Saitama's growth in the form of a graph.
This graph was rejected for scaling in the past. I'm here to say "nah, that's dumb."
To use this graph as a multiplier, we only need to assume two things are true.
1. Saitama at the beginning of this graph is 4-A, possibly 3-C.
2. The x-axis line is 0.
For #1, this is already accepted on the page as being his "Post-Balding" base strength.
For #2, the origin point representing 0 is universal in mathematics. For this to not be the general assumption, I believe you would need to bring forth evidence that suggests that. I do not see any. And frankly, this graph would be pretty pointless if it WASN'T zero.
The multiplier for this graph has been calculated here.
This should be completely fine to use. The graph is stated and shown to be exponential, we can seem them actually growing in the fight, it doesn't contradict itself at all, it doubles down on Saitama reaching some unprecedented level of strength, etc... It's pretty clear-cut that this is a genuine multiplier of strength.
So yeah, don't see why it wouldn't be used. It requires only 2 assumptions, both of which are already self-evident. And there's no contradictions. Everything points to this being a genuine multiplier. All you have to do is a simple calculation to find it.
Votes
Bold = Staff
Those in agreement: 13 (3;10): @DarkDragonMedeus, @Qawsedf234, @Maverick_Zero_X, @Phoenks, @Romeu08, @RinneItachi, @ImposingTiger, @Tural2004, @Giannysmag, @Quangotjokes, @Recon1511, @LordGinSama, @The_Yellow_Topaz
Those in disagreement (0: 0;1): @Ayewale
Those without an opinion (0: 0;0):
In Chapter 168 of OPM, we are given the finale of the fight of Saitama VS Cosmic Garou, where we see the true extent of Saitama's growth in the form of a graph.
This graph was rejected for scaling in the past. I'm here to say "nah, that's dumb."
To use this graph as a multiplier, we only need to assume two things are true.
1. Saitama at the beginning of this graph is 4-A, possibly 3-C.
2. The x-axis line is 0.
For #1, this is already accepted on the page as being his "Post-Balding" base strength.
For #2, the origin point representing 0 is universal in mathematics. For this to not be the general assumption, I believe you would need to bring forth evidence that suggests that. I do not see any. And frankly, this graph would be pretty pointless if it WASN'T zero.
The multiplier for this graph has been calculated here.
This should be completely fine to use. The graph is stated and shown to be exponential, we can seem them actually growing in the fight, it doesn't contradict itself at all, it doubles down on Saitama reaching some unprecedented level of strength, etc... It's pretty clear-cut that this is a genuine multiplier of strength.
So yeah, don't see why it wouldn't be used. It requires only 2 assumptions, both of which are already self-evident. And there's no contradictions. Everything points to this being a genuine multiplier. All you have to do is a simple calculation to find it.
Votes
Bold = Staff
Those in agreement: 13 (3;10): @DarkDragonMedeus, @Qawsedf234, @Maverick_Zero_X, @Phoenks, @Romeu08, @RinneItachi, @ImposingTiger, @Tural2004, @Giannysmag, @Quangotjokes, @Recon1511, @LordGinSama, @The_Yellow_Topaz
Those in disagreement (0: 0;1): @Ayewale
Those without an opinion (0: 0;0):
Last edited: