- 109
- 9
So the issue is my friend states the M should be L1-A because he transcends concept of space time too (which its [I think] 1-A too). Here is the full sentence of him:
The concept of spacetime is L1A because the concept of spacetime encompasses all dimensions: 4D, 5D, 6D, etc. So, what is being discussed here? What is meant here? The important part is this sentence: "beyond time, space, and casuality."
In this sentence, space, time, and casuality are connected by the same verb.
Causality is already a concept, and if the phrase "beyond causality" expresses being beyond the concept of causality, then the same conceptual "beyond" applies to time and space, which are also connected by the same word. To assume that one concept is conceptual and the other is beyond a different kind of concept when both are connected by the same verb in the same sentence is linguistically and logically inconsistent.
Therefore, the m has L1A.
Here is the arg: .hgguv - Imgur https://share.google/rzMwU83rFzYfYzg1Y
The concept of spacetime is L1A because the concept of spacetime encompasses all dimensions: 4D, 5D, 6D, etc. So, what is being discussed here? What is meant here? The important part is this sentence: "beyond time, space, and casuality."
In this sentence, space, time, and casuality are connected by the same verb.
Causality is already a concept, and if the phrase "beyond causality" expresses being beyond the concept of causality, then the same conceptual "beyond" applies to time and space, which are also connected by the same word. To assume that one concept is conceptual and the other is beyond a different kind of concept when both are connected by the same verb in the same sentence is linguistically and logically inconsistent.
Therefore, the m has L1A.
Here is the arg: .hgguv - Imgur https://share.google/rzMwU83rFzYfYzg1Y